The impact of group medical visits on the number of days spent after gynecological surgery

2000 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. D117-D117
Author(s):  
I.L. Ramos ◽  
P. Suassuna ◽  
M. Andrade
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 31-31
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kobe ◽  
Cynthia J. Coffman ◽  
Amy S. Jeffreys ◽  
William S. Yancy ◽  
Jennifer Zervakis ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The impact of baseline BMI on glycemic response to group medical visits (GMV) and weight management (WM)-based interventions is unclear. Our objective is to determine how baseline BMI class impacts patient responses to GMV and interventions that combine WM/GMV. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We will perform a secondary analysis of Jump Start, a randomized, controlled trial that compared the effectiveness of a GMV-based low carbohydrate diet-focused WM program (WM/GMV) to traditional GMV-based medication management (GMV) on diabetes control. The primary and secondary outcomes will be change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight at 48 months, respectively. Study participants will be stratified into BMI categories defined by BMI 27-29.9kg/m2, 30.0-34.9kg/m2, 35.0-39.9kg/m2, and ≥40.0kg/m2. Hierarchical mixed models will be used to examine the differential impact of the WM/GMV intervention compared to GMV on changes in outcomes by BMI class category. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Jump Start enrolled 263 overweight Veterans (BMI ≥ 27kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes. At baseline, mean BMI was 35.3 and mean HbA1c was 9.1. 14.5% were overweight (BMI 27–29.9) and 84.5% were obese (BMI ≥ 30). The proposed analyses are ongoing. We anticipate that patients in the higher BMI obesity classes will demonstrate greater reductions in HbA1c and weight with the WM/GMV intervention relative to traditional GMV. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This work will advance the understanding of the relationship between BMI and glycemic response to targeted interventions, and may ultimately provide guidance for interventions for type 2 diabetes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rae Dong ◽  
Claudia Leung ◽  
Mackenzie N. Naert ◽  
Violet Naanyu ◽  
Peninah Kiptoo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of mortality in the world, and innovative approaches to NCD care delivery are being actively developed and evaluated. Combining the group-based experience of microfinance and group medical visits is a novel approach to NCD care delivery that has demonstrated beneficial impact in previous pilot studies. However, the contextual factors, facilitators, and barriers impacting wide-scale implementation of these approaches within a low- and middle-income country setting are not well known.Methods: Two types of qualitative group discussion were conducted: 1) mabaraza (singular, baraza), a traditional East African community gathering used to discuss and exchange information in large group settings; and 2) focus group discussions (FGDs) among rural clinicians, community health workers, microfinance group members, and patients with NCDs. Trained research staff members led the discussions using structured question guides. Content analysis was performed with NVivo using deductive and inductive codes that were then grouped into themes.Results: We conducted 5 mabaraza and 16 FGDs. A total of 205 individuals (113 men and 92 women) participated in the mabaraza, while 162 individuals (57 men and 105 women) participated in the FGDs. Participants expressed interest in participating in microfinance and group medical visits, but cited several key challenges: 1) stigma of chronic disease, 2) earned skepticism of the health system, and 3) socio-economic fragility.Conclusions: Our qualitative study revealed and illuminated actionable factors that could impact the success of implementation of group medical visits and microfinance initiatives for NCD care. While several challenges were highlighted, participants also felt that planned interventions could address and mitigate the impact of these dynamic factors. We anticipate that our approach and analysis provides new insights and methodological techniques that will be relevant to other low-resource settings worldwide.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02501746, registration date: July 17, 2015


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0248496
Author(s):  
Rae Dong ◽  
Claudia Leung ◽  
Mackenzie N. Naert ◽  
Violet Naanyu ◽  
Peninah Kiptoo ◽  
...  

Background Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of mortality in the world, and innovative approaches to NCD care delivery are being actively developed and evaluated. Combining the group-based experience of microfinance and group medical visits is a novel approach to NCD care delivery. However, the contextual factors, facilitators, and barriers impacting wide-scale implementation of these approaches within a low- and middle-income country setting are not well known. Methods Two types of qualitative group discussion were conducted: 1) mabaraza (singular, baraza), a traditional East African community gathering used to discuss and exchange information in large group settings; and 2) focus group discussions (FGDs) among rural clinicians, community health workers, microfinance group members, and patients with NCDs. Trained research staff members led the discussions using structured question guides. Content analysis was performed with NVivo using deductive and inductive codes that were then grouped into themes. Results We conducted 5 mabaraza and 16 FGDs. A total of 205 individuals (113 men and 92 women) participated in the mabaraza, while 162 individuals (57 men and 105 women) participated in the FGDs. In the context of poverty and previous experiences with the health system, participants described challenges to NCD care across three themes: 1) stigma of chronic disease, 2) earned skepticism of the health system, and 3) socio-economic fragility. However, they also outlined windows of opportunity and facilitators of group medical visits and microfinance to address those challenges. Discussion Our qualitative study revealed actionable factors that could impact the success of implementation of group medical visits and microfinance initiatives for NCD care. While several challenges were highlighted, participants also described opportunities to address and mitigate the impact of these factors. We anticipate that our approach and analysis provides new insights and methodological techniques that will be relevant to other low-resource settings worldwide.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyu Geng ◽  
Hui Bi ◽  
Dai Zhang ◽  
Changji Xiao ◽  
Han Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Our objective was to evaluate the impact of multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol on quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods One hundred forty female patients scheduled for laparoscopic gynecological surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive either multimodal analgesia (Study group) or conventional opioid-based analgesia (Control group). The multimodal analgesic protocol consists of pre-operative acetaminophen and gabapentin, intra-operative flurbiprofen and ropivacaine, and post-operative acetaminophen and celecoxib. Both groups received an on-demand mode patient-controlled analgesia pump containing morphine for rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-40 score at postoperative day (POD) 2. Secondary outcomes included numeric pain scores (NRS), opioid consumption, clinical recovery, C-reactive protein, and adverse events. Results One hundred thirty-eight patients completed the study. The global QoR-40 scores at POD 2 were not significantly different between groups, although scores in the pain dimension were higher in Study group (32.1 ± 3.0 vs. 31.0 ± 3.2, P = 0.033). In the Study group, NRS pain scores, morphine consumption, and rescue analgesics in PACU (5.8% vs. 27.5%; P = 0.0006) were lower, time to ambulation [5.0 (3.3–7.0) h vs. 6.5 (5.0–14.8) h; P = 0.003] and time to bowel function recovery [14.5 (9.5–19.5) h vs.17 (13–23.5) h; P = 0.008] were shorter, C-reactive protein values at POD 2 was lower [4(3–6) ng/ml vs. 5 (3–10.5) ng/ml; P = 0.022] and patient satisfaction was higher (9.8 ± 0.5 vs. 8.8 ± 1.2, P = 0.000). Conclusion For minimally invasive laparoscopic gynecological surgery, multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol offered better pain relief, lower opioid use, earlier ambulation, faster bowel function recovery and higher patient satisfaction, while no improvement in QoR-40 score was found. Trial registration ChiCTR1900026194; Date registered: Sep 26,2019.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iniya Rajendran ◽  
Patricia Williams ◽  
Pei-Chun McGregor

Introduction: Group Medical Visits (GMV) are medical appointments where patients with similar medical conditions are seen in a group setting. Heart Failure (HF) is an ideal fit for the GMV model of healthcare delivery. HF guidelines emphasize the need for a self-care regimen including symptom knowledge, medication adherence, dietary and lifestyle modifications and social support. We conducted an intervention with these elements in a GMV setting to assess feasibility and improvement in quality of life (QoL). Methods: We enrolled a convenience sample of high-risk veterans with HF who required frequent follow up. Veterans participated in a longitudinal GMV for eight sessions lasting two hours each and occurring once a month. A curriculum was prepared a priori, and each session was led by an invited guest facilitator and focused on nutrition, exercise, stress, holistic health among others. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment and retention data. We also collected pre-post medication compliance data and QoL change using the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). We gathered feedback after each session. Results: Twelve patients were invited to the program and nine patients attended the first session. The average attendance was 6 participants each week with 4 participants attending all eight sessions. All were men, 22% identified as Black and 8 of 9 participants had preserved ejection fraction and obesity. At baseline, the mean KCCQ was 49.2. At the end of the intervention, the mean change in KCCQ-12 score was +9 (p=0.39). The largest change (+12, p=0.13) was seen on the QoL subscale. No significant improvement was seen in medication compliance. Participants listed community building, peer to peer education, learning about hospital services and continued contact with their provider as highlights of the program. Due to invitation of high-risk individuals, we had one death and seven hospitalizations during the study period. Conclusions: Longitudinal GMVs for high risk patients has a role in HF education and management. It may improve QoL and provider-patient relationship. It is well accepted by the veteran population and has the potential to be routinely integrated into clinical practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Sally R. Greenwald ◽  
Sarah Watson ◽  
Mindy Goldman ◽  
Tami S. Rowen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document