HHS Cuts the Red Tape on Health Care Electronic Payments

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (14) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carola van Eijk ◽  
Trui Steen ◽  
René Torenvlied

In the context of public service delivery, public professionals nowadays intensively collaborate with citizens. The joint, sometimes mandatorily, efforts of citizens and professionals to provide public services have become known as “coproduction.” Although coproduction directly affects professionals’ work environment, professionals’ attitudes toward coproduction are hardly studied. This article explains variation in professionals’ engagement in coproduction from characteristics of their work environment, specifically their perceived level of autonomy, perceived organizational support for coproduction, and perceived red tape associated with coproduction activities. Survey research was conducted to question managers of Dutch organizations for elderly care about their interaction with client councils, an example of coproduction activities in the domain of health care. The results show that perceived autonomy in coproduction, red tape associated with coproduction, and organizational support affect professionals’ engagement. Organizational support moreover reinforces the effect of work autonomy on professionals’ perception on the importance of coproduction. These findings add to the study of coproduction and can help support public organizations to improve coproduction.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-575
Author(s):  
J. F. L.

What would the chances for congressional approval of President Clinton's health care plan be if Americans peered into the future and discovered that: Over half of the patients (55%) in the plan with routine medical problems wait three hours or longer, sometimes all day, to be seen for a few minutes by an over-worked doctor struggling with increasing numbers of patients and piles of government forms, regulations, controls and policy directives... The VA is the largest health care system, public or private, in the U.S. and one of the largest in the world. It operates 171 medical centers with 80,000 beds; 362 out-patient and community clinics with 23 million patient visits annually... VA is the quintessential government bureaucracy: administratively officious and laden with red tape and regulatory minutiae destructive to both quality patient care and staff conduct. Three volumes of the U.S. Code (title 38) and a full volume of the Code of Federal Regulations, plus scores of volumes of federal personnel and other policy restrictions, govern each VA employee's every move. Thousands of pages provide detailed descriptions of medical conditions, degrees of disability and potential eligibility for pension benefits and free health care.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Kendra Carlson

The Supreme Court of California held, in Delaney v. Baker, 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610 (1999), that the heightened remedies available under the Elder Abuse Act (Act), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15657,15657.2 (West 1998), apply to health care providers who engage in reckless neglect of an elder adult. The court interpreted two sections of the Act: (1) section 15657, which provides for enhanced remedies for reckless neglect; and (2) section 15657.2, which limits recovery for actions based on “professional negligence.” The court held that reckless neglect is distinct from professional negligence and therefore the restrictions on remedies against health care providers for professional negligence are inapplicable.Kay Delaney sued Meadowood, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), after a resident, her mother, died. Evidence at trial indicated that Rose Wallien, the decedent, was left lying in her own urine and feces for extended periods of time and had stage I11 and IV pressure sores on her ankles, feet, and buttocks at the time of her death.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
O. Lawrence ◽  
J.D. Gostin

In the summer of 1979, a group of experts on law, medicine, and ethics assembled in Siracusa, Sicily, under the auspices of the International Commission of Jurists and the International Institute of Higher Studies in Criminal Science, to draft guidelines on the rights of persons with mental illness. Sitting across the table from me was a quiet, proud man of distinctive intelligence, William J. Curran, Frances Glessner Lee Professor of Legal Medicine at Harvard University. Professor Curran was one of the principal drafters of those guidelines. Many years later in 1991, after several subsequent re-drafts by United Nations (U.N.) Rapporteur Erica-Irene Daes, the text was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly as the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care. This was the kind of remarkable achievement in the field of law and medicine that Professor Curran repeated throughout his distinguished career.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document