04/02377 Residential-commercial energy input estimationbased on genetic algorithm (GA) approaches: an application of Turkey

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 335
2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harun Kemal Ozturk ◽  
Olcay Ersel Canyurt ◽  
Arif Hepbasli ◽  
Zafer Utlu

Energy Policy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1011-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olcay Ersel Canyurt ◽  
Harun Kemal Ozturk ◽  
Arif Hepbasli ◽  
Zafer Utlu

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 480
Author(s):  
Hossein Yousefi ◽  
Mohamad Aramesh ◽  
Bahman Shabani

This study presents a novel, highly detailed, and accurate modelling method for calculation of the total annual solar thermal energy received by a double-slope solar still. The model is further utilized for sensitivity analysis and optimization with the help of Genetic Algorithm and TOPSIS methods. The model reveals that the main parameters that can independently affect solar energy input are the basin length, width, tilt angle, surface azimuth angle, and the glass covers’ inclination angle. The sensitivity of the annual solar energy input to all these parameters is analyzed. Moreover, all the parameters are chosen to be involved in the optimization problem. Sensitivity analysis results show that except for basin azimuth angle all other parameters significantly affect the amount of energy input to the solar still. Genetic Algorithm identified 60 optimum sets of parameters, one of which was selected by the TOPSIS method. The optimum values for the basin width, length, tilt and azimuth angles, and the inclination angles of the two glass covers are 2 m, 2 m, 8°, 180°, 80° and 67°, respectively. This design of a double-slope solar still will receive an annual total of 97.67 GJ solar energy input.


1970 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaikh Khosruzzaman ◽  
M Ali Asgar ◽  
KM Rezaur Rahman ◽  
Showkat Akbar

Results of the energy intensity and overall energetic efficiency show that total energy outputincreased from 69.87 to 82.08 GJha-1, with increasing commercial energy input from 17.94 to 27.10GJha-1 during 1990 to 2005. The corresponding increase in energy intensity was 45.67 to 54.47MJ/US$(2000). Energetic efficiency, calculated as the ratio of total output to input for differentcrops, using weight factor, decreased from 3.97 to 3.03. The energetic efficiency declines withincreasing energy input, and the result indicates that input energy increases faster compared toenergy output. The mechanization index increased from 64 to 78%. However, the main goal beingmaximization of the output per unit agricultural land, the estimated change in efficiency withincreasing input can play an important role in choosing the appropriate input for optimum output.Key words: Energy intensity; Productivity; AgricultureDOI: 10.3329/jbas.v34i1.5492Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, Vol.34, No.1, 59-70, 2010


1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1281-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Sutton ◽  
D. L. Hunter ◽  
N. Jan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document