75: A Systematic Review of Intrafraction Patient Motion During Linear Accelerator-Based Spinal Radiation Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. S34
Author(s):  
Adam Mutsaers ◽  
Stephanie Gulstene ◽  
Timothy K. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Patient Motion

Role of Internal Mammary Node Radiation as a Part of Modern Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 617-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Verma ◽  
Frank Vicini ◽  
Rahul D. Tendulkar ◽  
Atif J. Khan ◽  
Jessica Wobb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Internal Mammary Node ◽  
Internal Mammary

A Systematic Review and Framework for the Use of Hormone Therapy with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Spratt ◽  
Robert T. Dess ◽  
Zachary S. Zumsteg ◽  
Daniel W. Lin ◽  
Phuoc T. Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Prostate Cancer ◽  
Salvage Radiation Therapy

scholarly journals Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer( ≤ 5cm): A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yueling Zhou ◽  
Ping Wen ◽  
Yue Yu ◽  
Zhenyi Yang ◽  
Yixuan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc

Abstract Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered as the preferred treatment method for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still a debate on the efficacy of SBRT and surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to compare survival outcomes of SBRT and surgery for early-stage NSCLC (≤5cm).Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare survival outcomes of surgery and SBRT. And the pooled analysis was conducted with STATA 14.0 software. Results: Thirty-nine comparative studies were included for systematic review and twenty-eight of which for quantitative analysis. Compared with SBRT, overall survival (OS) was superior after surgical resection, included lobectomy, sublobar resection, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and thoracotomy, for patients with early-stage NSCLC (≤5cm). And the results of subgroup analysis remained the support of surgery except for the OS of operable matched cohorts and the one matched cohort of age ≥75. However, the HR of OS showed a reduction from patients with unspecific age, ≥65 to ≥75 years old and histopathologically confirmed NSCLC to clinical NSCLC. Although cancer-specific survival and local control was superior after surgery, the recurrence rate of tumors, locoregional control, distant control, and regional control of matched patients demonstrated no significantly different outcomes between SBRT and surgery for early-stage NSCLC.Conclusions: Results show that surgery has superior OS, CSS and local control compared to SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. There is still necessary to explore the survival difference between SBRT and surgery for patients with different characteristics by large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized clinical studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document