New armless image-guidance system for endoscopic sinus surgery

1998 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randal A. Otto ◽  
Marvin P. Fried ◽  
Kleefield Jonathan ◽  
Taylor Rodney
2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin P. Fried ◽  
Vik M. Moharir ◽  
Jennifer Shin ◽  
Marta Taylor-Becker ◽  
Paul Morrison ◽  
...  

Background Image guidance based on preacquired computed tomography scans of the patient is a technique used to assist the physician during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study seeks to compare ESS with and without image guidance, analyzing a number of parameters that can impact on efficacy. Methods Retrospective chart review took place at a tertiary care referral center. The study group consisted of 97 consecutive patients confirmed to have undergone ESS using an electromagnetic intraoperative image guidance system (IGS). The control group consisted of 61 consecutive patients who underwent ESS, before the IGS was available at the study hospital. The main outcomes measured were analysis of patient profile, including coexisting conditions such as asthma and polyposis, assessment of which specific sinuses underwent surgical treatment; major and minor complications; estimated blood loss (EBL); operative time; and the need for repeat surgery. Results The IGS group had 74% of patients with polyposis; more sinuses, on average, which underwent surgical revision; one major and three minor complications; an average EBL of 134 cc, an average procedure time of 154 minutes; and one patient who needed repeat surgery in a 3-month follow-up period. The non-IGS group had 40% of patients with polyposis; seven major complications and one minor complication; an average EBL of 94 cc; and three patients who needed repeat surgery within 3 months. Conclusions The use of an IGS for endoscopic sinus surgery may reduce the complications associated with the procedure and allow for a more thorough operation. However, operative time and EBL may be increased.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Dixon ◽  
Harley Chan ◽  
Michael J. Daly ◽  
Allan D. Vescan ◽  
Ian J. Witterick ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-15
Author(s):  
Michael J. Marino ◽  
Martin J. Citardi ◽  
William C. Yao ◽  
Amber Luong

1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 337-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin P. Fried ◽  
Jonathan Kleefield ◽  
Ferenc A. Jolesz ◽  
Liangge Hsu ◽  
Harsha V. Gopal ◽  
...  

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in otorhinolaryngology and is associated with a definite risk for both intraoperative and postoperative complications. Intraoperative image guidance is expected to have a major effect on procedures such as ESS by allowing the clinician to more efficiently remove pathology and by improving surgeon confidence and knowledge of anatomy, particularly in revision procedures or in patients with altered anatomy. As a consequence, complications during these pro-’ cedures will decrease and patient safety will increase. Several guidance modalities are available including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluoroscopy. This article will describe current applications of each of these three techniques with respect to ESS while focusing on innovative techniques that use MRI and CT to provide intraoperative guidance with unmatched convenience, reliability, and utility.


2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. 286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Beswick ◽  
Vijay R. Ramakrishnan

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.F. Thong ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
S. Yeak ◽  
J.K. Siow

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 376-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Suzuki ◽  
H. Sakurai ◽  
S. Seno ◽  
T. Kitanishi ◽  
T. Shimizu ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford A. Woodworth ◽  
Gavin W. Davis ◽  
Rodney J. Schlosser

Background Use of image-guidance systems has become more popular in endoscopic sinus surgery. The laser registration technique has been used previously; however, a less expensive surface-touch registration technique recently has been developed. We compared the accuracy and speed of laser and surface-touch registration techniques. Methods Localization accuracy after laser and surface-touch registration was examined after 15 endoscopic sinonasal procedures between July and September 2004. Compared anatomic locations included the nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, posterior maxillary wall, skull base, and posterior vomer. For each localization point, the degree of error (in millimeters) was measured in superior–inferior (SI), anterior–posterior (AP), and right-left (RL) dimensions. The length of time for each registration procedure was recorded for both techniques. Results Laser registration was significantly faster (mean, 20 seconds) than surface-touch registration (mean, 20 seconds versus 63 seconds, respectively; p < 0.05). Laser registration was accurate within 0.3 mm in the SI direction, 0.4 mm in the AP direction, and 0.4 mm in the RL direction. Surface-touch registration was accurate within 0.3 mm in the SI direction, 0.4 mm in the AP direction, and 0.3 mm in the RL direction. There was no significant difference between techniques for any anatomic point. In 97.7% of all points, accuracy was within 2 mm or less for both the laser and surface-touch registration. Conclusion Surface-touch registration is significantly slower than laser registration but has virtually no difference in accuracy. Both techniques compare very favorably to the accuracy of other systems reported in the literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document