MON-PO534: Clinical Impact of Preoperative Serum Cholinesterase in Gastric Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. S256
Author(s):  
Y. Hirono ◽  
K. Katayama ◽  
T. Naruse ◽  
T. Goi
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 570-571
Author(s):  
Y. Hirono ◽  
K. Katayama ◽  
T. Tsubaki ◽  
M. Morikawa ◽  
T. Goi

Cancer ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1836-1840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikuo Takahashi ◽  
Yoshihiko Maehara ◽  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Motofumi Yoshida ◽  
Yoshihiro Kakeji ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Graziano ◽  
V Catalano ◽  
P Lorenzini ◽  
E Giacomini ◽  
D Sarti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pu Huang ◽  
Yiran Zhang ◽  
Anqiang Wang ◽  
Zhao-de Bu

Abstract Background Studies have shown that inflammation-associated blood cell markers are associated with prognoses in a variety of tumors. However, the prognostic significance of these markers for gastric cancer (GC) is still not very clear. This article aims to explore its value of GC prognostic assessment.Methods From July 2011 to July 2016, 353 GC patients with surgical treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients’ demographics were analyzed along with clinical and pathologic data. The chi-square test was used to evaluate relationships between the markers and other clinicopathological variables; The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression proportional hazard model were performed to evaluate prognostic factors.Results Univariate analysis indicated T stage, N stage, vascular tumor thrombus, tumor long diameter, Bormann Classification, preoperative MWR (monocyte/leukocyte ratio), preoperative serum CEA levels are prognostic factors for GC. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative MWR, tumor differentiation, and tumor length were independent prognostic factors in patients with GC. The boundary value of MWR is 0.8.Conclusion Preoperative MWR was convenient, simple marker of gastric cancer, might be useful for the evaluation of prognosis of patients with GC. Comparing with TNM stage, tumor differentiation was a more reliable pathological factor evaluating recurrence.


Author(s):  
Ze-ping Huang ◽  
Wen-jun Zhang ◽  
Zi-xian Wang ◽  
Hai-peng Liu ◽  
Xiang-Ting Zeng ◽  
...  

Background: Accurate staging of lymph node (LN) status is essential for predicting prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Recent proposals suggest that lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) may have superior accuracy in predicting survival by minimizing stage migration. The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic performances of the UICC (pN), LNR and LODDS staging systems and incorporate the optimal system into a nomogram for predicting individual survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer. Methods: The study cohort comprised of 423 patients who had undergone D2 lymphadenectomy. The discriminatory powers of the different LN staging systems were compared using the concordance index (C-index). The optimal system was incorporated into a prognostic nomogram with other independent prognosticators, and bootstrap validation was performed. Results: When LN status was assessed as a continuous variable, the LNR system (C-index: 0.712) was superior to pN (C-index: 0.695) and LODDS (C-index: 0.704). Age, LNR, and preoperative serum CA 19-9 and CA 125 were incorporated into a nomogram for predicting 2-year overall survival. Internal validation of the nomogram revealed good predictive abilities, with a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.704. Conclusion: Overall, LNR was the optimum predicator of survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer on the basis of LN status. LNR was incorporated into a nomogram along with age and preoperative serum CA 19-9 and CA 125. Internal validation confirmed the predictive ability of this nomogram.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document