36P Clinical impact and carcinogenic mechanism of USP3 overexpression in gastric cancer

92 Background: ToGA study showed superiority of adding T-mab to standard chemotherapy and a positive correlation between HER2 expression levels and the T-mab efficacy. In gastric cancer IHH is frequently recognized but its clinical impact on T-mab efficacy is unclear. Methods: Patients who were treated with T-mab and had surgical specimens available for IHC test were retrospectively examined. When all tumor cells overexpressed HER2 protein by IHC, the tumor was defined as non-HER2-heterogeneous. The others were defined as HER2-heterogeneous. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by the log-rank test. The level of significance was set to p<0.05 and all statistical tests were two-sided. Results: 23 patients were enrolled. Their median age was 68 years and 83% were male. PS 0, GEJ cancer, intestinal type histology, visceral metastasis (lung or liver), and previous chemotherapy were found in 57%, 35%, 83%, 57%, and 57% of them, respectively. After a median follow-up of 11.3 months, the median OS, PFS, and overall response rate were 14.4 months, 10.8 months, and 62.5%, respectively. All tumors were IHC3+, and 13 were non-HER2-heterogeneous and 10 were HER2-heterogeneous. There was no significant difference in clinicopathological features between the two groups. Median PFS in non-HER2-heterogeneous group (21.9 months) was significantly longer than that in HER2-heterogeneous group (8.6 months), (HR: 0.24 [0.06-0.91], P=0.024). Median OS in non-HER2-heterogeneous group was not reached while that in HER2-heterogeneous group was 12.9 months (HR: 0.29 [0.06-1.42], P=0.102). A higher rate of response to T-mab was seen in non-HER2-heterogeneous group than in HER2-heterogeneous group, though the difference was not statistically significant (75% vs. 50%, p=0.608). Conclusions: IHH might have robust clinical impact on T-mab efficacy for HER2 positive GC. These findings should be validated by independent large cohorts and further molecular correlative analyses are warranted.

Download Full-text

Clinical impact of postgastrectomy sarcopenia on the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.311 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 311-311

Author(s):

Beom Jin Kim ◽

Eun Sun Lee ◽

Joong-Min Park ◽

In Gyu Hwang

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Muscle Mass ◽

Surgical Resection ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Clinical Impact ◽

Free Survival ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Fat Volume ◽

Disease Free

311 Background: There is a lack of research on newly developed sarcopenia postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors and the clinical impact of postgastrectomy sarcopenia on the prognosis in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data from 430 consecutive GC patients who underwent surgical resection at Chung-Ang University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2015. Their skeletal muscle mass and abdominal fat volume were measured by abdominal CT imaging. Results: A total of 425 patients were analyzed in the study. The mean age was 62 years old and male were 301 (70.8%). Of these, 42 patients (9.9%) were diagnosed as pre-operative sarcopenia. Compared with non-sarcopenic group, pre-operative sarcopenia groups showed more female, higher BMI, less alcoholic, and less smoking. However, there was no significant difference in 5 - year overall survival and disease free survival between the groups (p = 0.836 and p = 0.638, respectively). Among 381 non-sarcopenic patients, 48 patients (12.6%) were diagnosed as newly developed sarcopenia in one year after gastric resection. Compared with non-sarcopenic group, the newly developed sarcopenic group showed more male, more undifferentiated tumor, lower hemoglobin level, less alcoholic, less smoking, and presence of diabetes mellitus. However, there was no significant difference in the 5 - year overall survival and disease free survival among non-sarcopenic, sarcopenic, and newly developed sarcopenic groups (p = 0.521 and p = 0.534, respectively). The relationship between preoperative body fat volume and postoperative muscle mass showed a significant correlation (rho = 0.296, p < 0.001), but only BMI was significantly associated with long term survival. Conclusions: Although newly developed sarcopenia after surgery did not affect the survival rate, patients with nutritional risk of sarcopenia after surgical resection may require early evaluation of nutritional status and nutritional support.

Download Full-text