A unified model for slug flow generation

1996 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
M Bernicot
1995 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bernicot ◽  
P. Deheuvels

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Sarica ◽  
Hong-Quan Zhang ◽  
Robert J. Wilkens

Slug flow is one of the common flow patterns in gas and oil production and transportation. One of the closure relationships required by the multiphase flow mechanistic models is slug length correlation. There are several closure relationships proposed in the literature as function of pipe geometry, pipe diameter, and inclination angle, and to a lesser extent to the flow rates and fluid properties. In this paper, we show that most of the frequently used mechanistic models are insensitive to slug length information. The only exception to this is identified as the Zhang et al. (2003, “Unified Model for Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow via Slug Dynamics—Part 1: Model Development,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 125, pp. 266–272). The unified model shows sensitivity at high gas flow rates, while displaying a negligible sensitivity at low gas flow rates. In conclusion, the slug length closure relationship is not crucial for pressure loss and holdup calculations. It can be speculated that the success of the unit cell slug flow modeling approach could be attributed to insensitivity of the models to slug length considering the highly probabilistic nature of the slug length.


2014 ◽  
Vol 936 ◽  
pp. 1662-1665
Author(s):  
Yi Wang

Hydrodynamics in a liquid-liquid slug flow in a T-junction microchannel of 600μm diameter, operated under a squeezing regime, was simulated with the computational fluid dynamics method. The slug flow generation simulated shows very good agreement with experimental snapshots where the clear slug formation takes place in the vicinity of the T-junction. The internal circulation within each slug was also obtained, which could make us better understand the hydrodynamics of liquid-liquid slug flow in microchannel.


Author(s):  
Cem Sarica ◽  
Hong-Quan Zhang ◽  
Robert J. Wilkens

Slug flow is one of the common flow patterns in gas and oil production and transportation. One of the closure relationships required by the multiphase flow mechanistic models is slug length correlation. There are several closure relationships proposed in the literature as function of pipe geometry, pipe diameter and inclination angle, and to a lesser extent to the flow rates and fluid properties. In this paper, we show that most of the frequently used mechanistic models are insensitive to slug length information. The only exception to this is identified as the Zhang et al. Unified model [1]. The unified model shows sensitivity at high gas flow rates, while displaying a negligible sensitivity at low gas flow rates. In conclusion, the slug length closure relationship is not crucial for pressure loss and holdup calculations. It can be speculated that the success of the unit cell slug flow modeling approach could be attributed to insensitivity of the models to slug length considering the highly probabilistic nature of the slug length.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Kadowaki ◽  
Koichi Suzumori ◽  
Yoshiro Kawakami ◽  
Yusaku Sakata

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 532-539
Author(s):  
David Hellmann ◽  
Ícaro de Oliveira‐Goncalves ◽  
David W. Agar
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Felizola ◽  
O. Shoham

The effect of pipe inclination on upward two-phase slug flow characteristics has been studied both experimentally and theoretically. Experimental data were acquired for the entire range of inclination angles, from horizontal to vertical. New correlations were developed for slug length and liquid holdup in the slug body as a function of inclination angle. A unified model has been developed for the prediction of slug flow behavior in upward inclined pipes. Reasonable agreement is observed between the pressure drop predicted by the model and the experimental data.


Author(s):  
Kenshiro Muramatsu ◽  
Youngjik Youn ◽  
Youngbae Han ◽  
Keishi Yokoyama ◽  
Yosuke Hasegawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document