An analytical framework for studying: compliance and legitimacy in fisheries management

Marine Policy ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Raakjær Nielsen
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ahmad Marthin Hadiwinata

AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis ketentuan hukum nasional dalam pengelolaan perikanan berbasis masyarakat (PPBM). Penulis menggunakan kerangka analisis Kuemlangan dan Teigene dalam artikelnya yang berjudul: “An Overview Of Legal Issues And Broad Legislative Considerations For Community Based Fisheries Management.” Tidak ada cetak biru dalam menciptakan kerangka hukum bagi PPBM namun hukum akan menentukan pengaturan mengenai PPBM. Perlu untuk melakukan penilaian terhadap penerimaan konstitusi atas PPBM dengan contoh hak kepemilikan bersama serta bagaimana desentralisasi kewenangan pengelolaan diatur. Penulis menemukan kemungkinan adanya konflik berdasarkan UU Perikanan, UU PWP3K dan UU Pemda dalam pengelolaan sumber daya perairan dan laut. Desa sebagai peluang penciptaan PPBM dapat menerapkan empat prinsip yaitu jaminan, ekslusivitas, keberlangsungan serta fleksibilitas. Tetapi terdapat hambatan dengan tidak terintegrasinya PPBM dalam kerangka hukum perikanan yang lebih luas. Penulis menyarankan adanya perubahan kebijakan menyeluruh dalam hukum perikanan yang mengakui pengelolaan oleh masyarakat dalam perikanan. AbstractThis article aims to analyze the provisions of national law in a community-based fisheries management (CBFM). The author uses analytical framework Kuemlangan and Teigenen in an article entitled: “An Overview Of Legal Issues And Broad Legislative Considerations For Community Based Fisheries Management.” There is no blueprint in creating a legal framework but the law will define the arrangements regarding CBFM. There is a need to conduct an assessment of the constitutionality of CBFM, for example related to the common property rights and decentralization of management authority. The author discovered a possible conflict based on Fisheries Act, Coastal and Small Island Act and Local Government Act in the management of marine resources. Villages as opportunities for establishing CBFM can apply four principles such as: security, exclusivity, permanence and flexibility. However, there are constraints in the integration of CBFM in the wider legal framework of fisheries. The author suggests a comprehensive legal reform in the fishery law to recognize community management with regard to fisheries.


<em>Abstract.</em>—The 1996 Sustainable Fisheries Act states that all federal fisheries management plans should contain a description of essential fish habitat (EFH). While much emphasis has been placed on estimating EFH for marine stocks, very little attention has been paid to doing so for Pacific salmon <em>Oncorhynchus </em>spp., in part due to their complex life histories. An earlier assessment of EFH for Pacific salmon across the west coast of the United States focused on the freshwater component of EFH due to limited knowledge about marine distributions. That analysis concluded that a more in-depth and smaller-scale examination was needed to assess how freshwater habitat affects the various life stages. Here we use a detailed life history model for Pacific salmon to estimate the freshwater component of EFH for two threatened populations of Chinook salmon within a large watershed draining into Puget Sound, Washington, USA. By accounting for proposed harvest rates, hatchery practices, and habitat structure, we identified 23 of 50 subbasins as EFH for ensuring no significant decrease in the total number of spawners relative to current average escapement. Our analytical framework could be easily applied to other populations or species of salmon to aid in developing recovery and management plans.


Water Policy ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence E. D. Smith ◽  
S. Nguyen Khoa ◽  
K. Lorenzen

An improved analytical framework and typology of fishers are provided to improve understanding of the diverse livelihood functions of inland fishing in development policy making. Inland fisheries make an important but often neglected contribution to rural livelihoods in developing countries. A holistic and widely applicable analysis of the possible livelihood functions of such fisheries is presented, focusing on fishing as one activity within diverse livelihoods. Four different livelihood strategies are identified, involving fishing as: (i) a primary livelihood of last resort, (ii) part of a diversified semi-subsistence livelihood, (iii) a specialist occupation and (iv) part of a diversified accumulation strategy. The policy implications of these strategies are found to be differentiated and poorly represented in practice by socio-economic analysis that either undfervalues fisheries or treats them solely as livelihoods of last resort and by traditional approaches to fisheries management centred on stock conservation. The need for a more diverse and flexible range of measures, tailored to local priorities and conditions and ensuring that poor people can access the benefits of inland fisheries whilst achieving conservation objectives, is identified.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-444
Author(s):  
Amanuel Isak Tewolde

Many scholars and South African politicians characterize the widespread anti-foreigner sentiment and violence in South Africa as dislike against migrants and refugees of African origin which they named ‘Afro-phobia’. Drawing on online newspaper reports and academic sources, this paper rejects the Afro-phobia thesis and argues that other non-African migrants such as Asians (Pakistanis, Indians, Bangladeshis and Chinese) are also on the receiving end of xenophobia in post-apartheid South Africa. I contend that any ‘outsider’ (White, Asian or Black African) who lives and trades in South African townships and informal settlements is scapegoated and attacked. I term this phenomenon ‘colour-blind xenophobia’. By proposing this analytical framework and integrating two theoretical perspectives — proximity-based ‘Realistic Conflict Theory (RCT)’ and Neocosmos’ exclusivist citizenship model — I contend that xenophobia in South Africa targets those who are in close proximity to disadvantaged Black South Africans and who are deemed outsiders (e.g., Asian, African even White residents and traders) and reject arguments that describe xenophobia in South Africa as targeting Black African refugees and migrants.


2015 ◽  
Vol 538 ◽  
pp. 257-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Longo ◽  
S Hornborg ◽  
V Bartolino ◽  
MT Tomczak ◽  
L Ciannelli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-164
Author(s):  
Claudio Baraldi ◽  
Laura Gavioli

This paper analyses healthcare interactions involving doctors, migrant patients and ‘intercultural mediators’ who provide interpreting services. Our study is based on a collection of 300 interactions involving two language pairs, Arabic–Italian and English–Italian. The analytical framework includes conversation analysis combined with insights from social systems theory. We look at question-answer sequences, where (1) the doctors ask questions about patients’ problems or history, (2) the doctors’ questions are responded to and (3) the doctor closes the sequence, moving on to another question. We analyse the ways in which mediators help doctors design questions for patients and patients understand and eventually respond to the doctors’ design. While the doctor’s question design aims at obtaining details which are relevant for the patients’ care, it is argued that collecting such details involves complex interactional work. In particular, doctors need help in displaying their attention to their patients’ problems and in guiding patients’ responses into medically relevant directions. Likewise, patients need help in reacting appropriately. Mediators help manage communicative uncertainty both by showing the doctor’s interest in what the patient says, and by exploring and rendering the patient’s incomplete, extended and ambiguous answers to the doctor’s questions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document