scholarly journals RESOURCE USE ONE YEAR FOLLOWING HOSPITALIZATION FOR ACUTE HEART FAILURE: A COMPARISON OF PATIENTS WITH PRESERVED VERSUS REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (10) ◽  
pp. A1027
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Nichols ◽  
Kristi Reynolds ◽  
Teresa M. Kimes ◽  
Wing Chan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
One Year

scholarly journals Levosimendan use in patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction with or without severe renal dysfunction in critical cardiac care units: a multi-institution database study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cze-Ci Chan ◽  
Kuang-Tso Lee ◽  
Wan-Jing Ho ◽  
Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
Pao-Hsien Chu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Care ◽  
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Cohort Entry ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Abnormal Renal Function

Abstract Background Acute heart failure is a life-threatening clinical condition. Levosimendan is an effective inotropic agent used to maintain cardiac output, but its usage is limited by the lack of evidence in patients with severely abnormal renal function. Therefore, we analyzed data of patients with acute heart failure with and without abnormal renal function to examine the effects of levosimendan. Methods We performed this retrospective cohort study using data from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). Patients admitted for heart failure with LVEF ≤ 40% between January 2013 and December 2018 who received levosimendan or dobutamine in the critical cardiac care units (CCU) were identified. Patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were mortality at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date. Results There were no significant differences in mortality rate at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date between the levosimendan and dobutamine groups, or between subgroups of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or on dialysis. The results were consistent before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Levosimendan did not increase short- or long-term mortality rates in critical patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction compared to dobutamine, regardless of their renal function. An eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was not necessarily considered a contraindication for levosimendan in these patients.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF RIGHT HEART CATHETERIZATION IN ACUTE HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 726
Author(s):  
Samarthkumar Thakkar ◽  
Harsh Patel ◽  
Kirtenkumar Patel ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Smit Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Right Heart Catheterization ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Abstract 12549: Circulating Irisin is a Novel Biomarker Providing Prognostic Information in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Hanatani ◽  
Yasuhiro Izumiya ◽  
Yuichi Kimura ◽  
Yoshiro Onoue ◽  
Satoshi Araki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Reduced skeletal muscle function link to poor prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Irisin is a newly identified muscle-derived protein found in human serum. The gene expression of irisin precursor fibronectin domain containing protein 5 in skeletal muscle is associated with exercise tolerance in HF patients. Hypothesis: Irisin could be a useful biomarker for disease severity and future adverse cardiovascular events in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: We measured serum irisin levels in 84 patients with HFrEF. HFrEF was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction≦50% and meet the Framingham criteria of HF. Serum irisin concentrations were measured by ELISA. The endpoint of this study was a composite of total mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization and coronary revascularization. Serum irisin levels were negatively correlated with serum high sensitive troponin T levels (r=-0.24, p=0.048). Right heart catheterization revealed that serum irisin levels had significant negative correlation with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (r=-0.23, p=0.044). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, cut-off values of irisin and BNP for prediction of one-year events were 55.548 ng/mL and 324.8 pg/mL, respectively. Kaplan Meier curve demonstrated that the event-free rate was decreased in the low irisin (≦cut-off value) group (log-rank test p=0.024). The combination of low irisin and high BNP (≧cut-off value) identified patients with a significantly higher probability of adverse events (p=0.008). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis identified low levels of irisin (≦cut-off value) (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-7.21, p=0.01) and ischemic etiology (HR: 3.32; 95% CI: 1.50-7.35, p=0.003) as independent predictors of mortality and cardiovascular events. ROC analysis revealed that irisin achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 for one-year events (p=0.031), and that the AUC increased when irisin was added to BNP level (alone: 0.64, BNP+irisin: 0.74). Conclusions: Irisin could be a useful biomarker for evaluating disease severity and providing incremental prognostic information in patients with HFrEF.

507 Acute heart failure: A comparison of preserved and reduced ejection fraction in the emergency department

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. S245-S246
Author(s):  
J.A. Ezekowitz ◽  
S. Lepage ◽  
S. Virani ◽  
R. Leader ◽  
M. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Burden of Recurrent Hospitalizations Following an Admission for Acute Heart Failure: Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Santas ◽  
Ernesto Valero ◽  
Anna Mollar ◽  
Sergio García-Blas ◽  
Patricia Palau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Patients characteristics and prognostic implications of type 2 diabetes mellitus in heart failure with preserved, mid-rang reduced and reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Marija Mrvošević ◽  
Marija Polovina
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
One Year ◽  
Unique Predictor ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is frequent in patients with heart failure (HF) and correlated with an increased morbidity and mortality. The features and outcomes of patients with and without T2DM, depending on the HF type (HF with preserved: HFpEF, mid-range: HFmrEF; and reduced ejection fraction: HFrEF), are inefficiently explored. Aim: To explore the impact of T2DM on clinical features and one-year overall mortality in patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF. Material and methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted, including patients with HF at the Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade. The enrolment occurred between November 2018 and January 2019. The study outcome was one-year all-cause mortality. Results: Study included 242 patients (mean-age, 71 ± 13 years, men 57%). T2DM was present in 31% of patients. The proportion of T2DM was similar amid patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF. Regardless of the HF type, patients with T2DM were probably older and had a higher prevalence of myocardial infarction, other types of coronary disorder or peripheral arterial disorder (all p < 0.001). Also, chronic kidney disease was more prevalent in T2DM (p < 0.001). In HFpEF, T2DM patients were commonly female, and usually had hypertension and atrial fibrillation (all p < 0.001). Estimated one-year total mortality rates were significantly higher in T2DM patients. It also emerged as a unique predictor of higher mortality in HFrEF (HR; 1.33; 95% CI; 1.34 - 2.00), HFmrEF (HR; 1.13; 95% CI; 1.0 - 1.24) and HFpEF (HR; 1.21; 95% CI; 1.09 - 1.56), all p < 0.05. Conclusion: Compared with non-diabetics, patients with HF and T2DM are older, with higher prevalence of comorbidities and greater one-year mortality, regardless of HF type. Heart failure is a unique predictor of mortality in all HF types in multivariate analysis. Considering the increased risk, T2DM requires meticulous screening/diagnosis and contemporary treatment to improve outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document