Application du Simplified Acute Physiology Score II ( SAPS II) dans une unité de soins intensifs médicaux

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 510-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ghuysen ◽  
B Lambermont ◽  
V D’Orio
1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 144A
Author(s):  
PhGH Metnitz ◽  
A. Valentin ◽  
H. Vesely ◽  
T. Lang

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aftab Haq ◽  
Sachin Patil ◽  
Alexis Lanteri Parcells ◽  
Ronald S. Chamberlain

Elderly patients in the USA account for 26–50% of all intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The applicability of validated ICU scoring systems to predict outcomes in the “Oldest Old” is poorly documented. We evaluated the utility of three commonly used ICU scoring systems (SAPS II, SAPS III, and APACHE II) to predict clinical outcomes in patients > 90 years. 1,189 surgical procedures performed upon 951 patients > 90 years (between 2000 and 2010) were analyzed. SAPS II, SAPS III, and Acute APACHE II were calculated for all patients admitted to the SICU. Differences between survivors and nonsurvivors were analyzed using the Student’st-test and binary logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed for each scoring system studied. The area under the ROC curve (aROC) for the SAPS III was 0.81 at a cut-off value of 57, whereas the aROC for SAPS II was 0.75 at a cut-off score of 44 and the aROC for APACHE II was 0.74 at a cut-off score of 13. The SAPS III ROC curve for prediction of hospital mortality exhibited the greatest sensitivity (84%) and specificity (66%) with a score of 57 for the “Oldest Old” population.


Author(s):  
Genesis S Barbosa ◽  
Bruna RS Moura ◽  
Tatiane GGN do Rio ◽  
Sérgio D Martuchi ◽  
Kézia P Lima ◽  
...  

RESUMO Objetivos Comparar idosos e não idosos, vitimas de trauma, segundo caracteristicas sociodemograficas e clinicas e identificar se idade avançada (≥60 anos) é fator de risco para mortalidade na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI). Material e metodo Coorte prospectiva, realizada entre 2012/2015, em quatro hospitais em Sao Paulo, Brasil. A amostra foi constituida por vitimas de trauma com idade ≥18 anos e permanencia superior a 24 horas na UTI. Foram comparados dois grupos: idosos (≥60 anos) e não idosos (<60 anos). Os testes Qui-Quadrado de Pearson, Exato de Fisher, t-Student e regressão logistica multipla foram aplicados, com nivel de significancia de 5%. Resultados Das 380 vítimas (73 idosos e 307 não idosos), a maioria era homens (87,9%), com idade média de 41,5 (±18,9) anos. A causa externa mais frequente foi queda (34,7%) seguida de acidente motociclístico (23,4%). A maioria dos idosos foi vítima de queda (75,4%). O tempo médio de permanência na UTI foi de 14,9 (±15,6) dias e um total de 74 (19,5%) pacientes evoluiu a óbito (53 não idosos e 21 idosos). Houve diferença significativa entre os grupos (p < 0,05) em relação ao gênero, causa externa, tipo de admissão na UTI, Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) e mortalidade. Os idosos apresentaram menores valores de ISS e NISS e maiores escores do SAPS II do que os não idosos. O fator de risco para mortalidade foi SAPS II (OR = 1,04; IC95% 1,03–1,06; p < 0,001) e tempo de permanência na UTI foi identificado como fator de proteção para o desfecho (OR = 0,98; IC95% 0,96–0,99; p = 0,021). Conclusões Apesar dos idosos apresentaram maior mortalidade do que os não idosos, a idade, variável de interesse desta pesquisa, não foi fator de risco para mortalidade em UTI. Significado clínico Os resultados deste estudo podem contribuir para estratégias de melhoria da qualidade do atendimento ao idoso traumatizado. How to cite this article Barbosa GS, Moura BRS, do Rio TGGN, Martuchi SD, Lima KP, Silva DV, Sousa RMC, Nogueira LS. Ser Idoso, Vítima de Trauma, é Fator de Risco Para Mortalidade Na Terapia Intensiva: Mito ou Realidade? Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2017;6(2):81-89.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Irschik ◽  
Jelena Veljkovic ◽  
Johann Golej ◽  
Gerald Schlager ◽  
Jennifer B. Brandt ◽  
...  

Objectives: In critical care it is crucial to appropriately assess the risk of mortality for each patient. This is especially relevant in pediatrics, with its need for accurate and repeatable scoring. Aim of this study was to evaluate an age-adapted version of the expanded Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; (p-SAPS II), a repeatable, newly-designed scoring system compared to established scores (Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score/pSOFA, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score-2/PELOD-2 and Pediatric Index of Mortality 3/PIM3).Design: This retrospective cohort pilot study included data collected from patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at the Medical University of Vienna between July 2017 through December 2018.Patients: 231 admissions were included, comprising neonates (gestational age of ≥ 37 weeks) and patients up to 18 years of age with a PICU stay longer than 48 h.Main Outcomes: Mortality risk prediction and discrimination between survivors and non-survivors were the main outcomes of this study. The primary statistical methods for evaluating the performance of each score were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and goodness-of-fit test.Results: Highest AUROC curve was calculated for p-SAPS II (AUC = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77–0.96; p &lt; 0.001). This was significantly higher than the AUROCs of PELOD-2/pSOFA but not of PIM3. However, in a logistic regression model including p-SAPS II and PIM3 as covariates, p-SAPS II had a significant effect on the accuracy of prediction (p = 0.003). Nevertheless, according to the goodness-of-fit test for p-SAPS II and PIM3, p-SAPS II overestimated the number of deaths, whereas PIM3 showed acceptable estimations. Repeatability testing showed increasing AUROC values for p-SAPS II throughout the clinical stay (0.96 at day 28) but still no significant difference to PIM 3. The prediction accuracy, although improved over the days and even exceeded PIM 3.Conclusions: The newly-created p-SAPS II performed better than the established PIM3 in terms of discriminating between survivors and non-survivors. Furthermore, p-SAPS II can be assessed repeatably throughout a patient's PICU stay what improves mortality prediction. However, there is still a need to optimize calibration of the score to accurately predict mortality sooner throughout the clinical stay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document