Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Need for Improved Implementation Strategies

2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen Randall ◽  
D. Wayne Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
Effective Implementation ◽  
Clinical Behaviour

Although substantial resources have been spent developing clinical practice guidelines, little effort has been made to evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation. In the absence of effective implementation, CPGs will have minimal impact on changing behaviours. This article critically reviews the literature and identifies a number of reasons why these guidelines have not been implemented successfully. If CPGs are to have a positive impact upon clinical behaviour and practice, then more aggressive and positive implementation strategies are indicated. Five key ingredients for successful implementation of quality CPGs are identified and recommended.

scholarly journals Planning Implementation Success of Syncope Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Emergency Department Using CFIR Framework

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Susan S. Smyth ◽  
Jessica M. Clouser ◽  
Colleen A. McMullen ◽  
Vedant Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Successful Implementation

Background and Objectives: Overuse and inappropriate use of testing and hospital admission are common in syncope evaluation and management. Though guidelines are available to optimize syncope care, research indicates that current clinical guidelines have not significantly impacted resource utilization surrounding emergency department (ED) evaluation of syncope. Matching implementation strategies to barriers and facilitators and tailoring strategies to local context hold significant promise for a successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Our team applied implementation science principles to develop a stakeholder-based implementation strategy. Methods and Materials: We partnered with patients, family caregivers, frontline clinicians and staff, and health system administrators at four health systems to conduct quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews for context assessment. The identification of implementation strategies was done by applying the CFIR-ERIC Implementation Strategy Matching Tool and soliciting stakeholders’ inputs. We then co-designed with patients and frontline teams, and developed and tested specific strategies. Results: A total of 114 clinicians completed surveys and 32 clinicians and stakeholders participated in interviews. Results from the surveys and interviews indicated low awareness of syncope guidelines, communication challenges with patients, lack of CPG protocol integration into ED workflows, and organizational process to change as major barriers to CPG implementation. Thirty-one patients and their family caregivers participated in interviews and expressed their expectations: clarity regarding their diagnosis, context surrounding care plan and diagnostic testing, and a desire to feel cared about. Identifying change methods to address the clinician barriers and patients and family caregivers expectations informed development of the multilevel, multicomponent implementation strategy, MISSION, which includes patient educational materials, mentored implementation, academic detailing, Syncope Optimal Care Pathway and a corresponding mobile app, and Lean quality improvement methods. The pilot of MISSION demonstrated feasibility, acceptability and initial success on appropriate testing. Conclusions: Effective multifaceted implementation strategies that target individuals, teams, and healthcare systems can be employed to plan successful implementation and promote adherence to syncope CPGs.

Ethical challenges in palliative sedation of adults: protocol for a systematic review of current clinical practice guidelines

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyna TOMCZYK ◽  
Cécile JAQUES ◽  
Ralf J. JOX
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Palliative Sedation ◽  
Current Clinical Practice ◽  
Ethical Challenges

Abstract Introduction: This study aims to identify the full spectrum of ethical challenges of all forms of palliative sedation for adults as presented in current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and to determine whether CPGs specify ethical challenges of this therapy for cancer and non-cancer patients and, if so, how exactly they do this. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have yet investigated this topic. The purpose is purely descriptive; our aim is not to make any kind of normative judgements on these challenges. Nor is our aim to assess the quality of the CPGs. Methods and analysis : We will perform a systematic review of CPGs on palliative sedation for adults via five electronic databases, grey literature search tools, citation tracking, and contact with palliative care experts. Current CPGs validated by an international, national, or regional authority, published in English, German, French, Italian, or Polish, from 2000 to the date of the search, will be subjected to content analysis at the textual, linguistic, and thematic levels. This study protocol is reported in accordance with the PRISMA-P criteria and registered on PROSPERO. Discussion The results of our systematic review can help raise awareness and understanding of the complexity of ethical problems, rigorously guide reflection in this field, and be useful in elaborating ethical guidelines in an interdisciplinary approach, in order to have a positive impact on the quality of patient care, education and training, and research in respect of this complex and challenging practice.

scholarly journals Aligning Documentation With Congenital Muscular Torticollis Clinical Practice Guidelines: Administrative Case Report

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Gutierrez ◽  
Sandra L. Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Congenital Muscular Torticollis ◽  
Muscular Torticollis

Background and Purpose A hospital-based pediatric outpatient center, wanting to weave evidence into practice, initiated an update of knowledge, skills, and documentation patterns with its staff physical therapists and occupational therapists who treat people with congenital muscular torticollis (CMT). This case report describes 2 cycles of implementation: (1) the facilitators and barriers to implementation and (2) selected quality improvement outcomes aligned with published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Case Description The Pediatric Therapy Services of St Joseph's Regional Medical Center in New Jersey has 4 full-time, 1 part-time, and 3 per diem staff. Chart audits in 2012 revealed variations in measurement, interventions, and documentation that led to quality improvement initiatives. An iterative process, loosely following the knowledge-to-action cycle, included a series of in-service training sessions to review the basic anatomy, pathokinesiology, and treatment strategies for CMT; reading assignments of the available CPGs; journal review; documentation revisions; and training on the recommended measurements to implement 2 published CPGs and measure outcomes. Outcomes A previous 1-page generic narrative became a 3-page CMT-specific form aligned with the American Physical Therapy Association Section on Pediatrics CMT CPG recommendations. Staff training on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) pain scale, classification of severity, type of CMT, prognostication, measures of cervical range of motion, and developmental progression improved documentation consistency from 0% to 81.9% to 100%. Clinicians responded positively to using the longer initial evaluation form. Discussion Successful implementation of both clinical and documentation practices were facilitated by a multifaceted approach to knowledge translation that included a culture supportive of evidence-based practice, administrative support for training and documentation redesign, commitment by clinicians to embrace changes aimed at improved care, and clinical guidelines that provide implementable recommendations.

Dissemination and Implementation of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ Clinical Practice Guidelines

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 336-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Codyre ◽  
Andrew Wilson ◽  
Juliette Begg ◽  
David Barton
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
System Level ◽  
Dissemination And Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Zealand College

Objective: The aim of this paper is to summarize information about the dissemination and implementation of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) since their completion in 2003, and assess the effectiveness of these activities. Method: The dissemination and implementation activities undertaken from 2003 to the present are described. Data regarding the dissemination of the clinician and consumer-carer versions of the CPGs are presented. The results of a series of implementation pilots are summarized. Results: Available data suggest the CPGs have been widely disseminated through both the clinician and consumer-carer communities in Australia and New Zealand, and that the consumer-carer versions in particular continue to be in high demand. Evaluation of CPG implementation pilots, using tools that assist in bringing summary evidence into clinical practice, have suggested that such tools are acceptable, are a useful aid to implementing evidence-based practice, and have a positive impact on practice. Common barriers to implementing the evidence are highlighted. Conclusions: Summary consumer-carer versions of CPGs seem to be acceptable and useful to both consumer-carers and non-government mental health providers. Locally led implementation of CPGs using tools that summarize evidence and support its use in everyday practice has a positive impact, but also highlights system-level barriers to implementing evidence-based practice.

scholarly journals Adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of cancers in Australia and the factors associated with adherence: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e050912
Author(s):  
Mia Bierbaum ◽  
Frances Rapport ◽  
Gaston Arnolda ◽  
Yvonne Tran ◽  
Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Factors Associated

IntroductionClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) synthesise the latest evidence to support clinical and patient decision-making. CPG adherent care is associated with improved patient survival outcomes; however, adherence rates are low across some cancer streams in Australia. Greater understanding of specific barriers to cancer treatment CPG adherence is warranted to inform future implementation strategies.This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to determine cancer treatment CPG adherence rates in Australia across a variety of common cancers, and to identify any factors associated with adherence to those CPGs, as well as any associations between CPG adherence and patient outcomes.Methods and analysisFive databases will be searched, Ovid Medline, PsychInfo, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science, for eligible studies evaluating adherence rates to cancer treatment CPGs in Australia. A team of reviewers will screen the abstracts in pairs according to predetermined inclusion criteria and then review the full text of eligible studies. All included studies will be assessed for quality and risk of bias. Data will be extracted using a predefined data extraction template. The frequency or rate of adherence to CPGs, factors associated with adherence to those CPGs and any reported patient outcome rates (eg, relative risk ratios or 5-year survival rates) associated with adherence to CPGs will be described. If applicable, a pooled estimate of the rate of adherence will be calculated by conducting a random-effects meta-analysis. The systematic review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval will not be required, as this review will present anonymised data from other published studies. Results from this study will form part of a doctoral dissertation (MB), will be published in a journal, presented at conferences, and other academic presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020222962.

scholarly journals Clinicians’ attitudes to oncology clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to adherence: a mixed methods study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e035448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Bierbaum ◽  
Jeffrey Braithwaite ◽  
Gaston Arnolda ◽  
Geoffrey P Delaney ◽  
Winston Liauw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Clinical Sample ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators

IntroductionClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to reduce inappropriate clinical variation and improve the quality of care. Barriers to CPGs include a lack of awareness of CPGs, access to them, time pressures and concerns regarding the evidence underpinning CPG development, implementation and dissemination. The objectives of this study are to assess clinicians’ attitudes to CPGs for cancer treatment and the perceived barriers to and facilitators of CPG adherence in order to inform the implementation of cancer treatment CPGs.Methods and analysisA mixed methods study will be conducted using a three-phase, sequential design, with each phase informing the next. In phase 1, a qualitative study using recorded interviews will investigate clinicians’ attitudes to CPGs for cancer treatment and perceptions of barriers and facilitators to CPG adherence (n=30); interview transcripts will be analysed thematically. In phase 2, a survey will quantify the frequency of attitudes, barriers and facilitators identified in phase 1, in a broader clinical sample (n=200). In phase 3, a workshop forum will be held to facilitate discussions examining the implications of phase 1 and 2 findings for cancer CPG implementation strategies (n=40) leading to recommendations for improvements to practice. The workshop discussion will be recorded, and the transcript will be analysed thematically.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethics approval in New South Wales, Australia (2019/ETH11722, #52019568810127). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will form part of a doctoral thesis and be presented at national and international conferences.

Effectiveness of Implementation Strategies to Improve Adherence of Physical Therapist Treatment Choices to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Musculoskeletal Conditions: Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 1516-1541
Author(s):  
Joshua R Zadro ◽  
Mary O’Keeffe ◽  
Jodie L Allison ◽  
Kirsty A Lembke ◽  
Joanna L Forbes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Educational Outreach ◽  
Treatment Choices ◽  
Musculoskeletal Conditions

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies aimed at improving the adherence of physical therapists’ treatment choices to clinical practice guidelines for a range of musculoskeletal conditions. Methods For this review, searches were performed in several databases combining terms synonymous with “practice patterns” and “physical therapy” until August 2019. The review included randomized controlled trials that investigated any intervention to improve the adherence of physical therapists’ treatment choices to clinical practice guidelines or research evidence. Treatment choices assessed by surveys, audits of clinical notes, and treatment recording forms were the primary measures of adherence. Self-reported guideline adherence was the secondary measure. Three reviewers independently assessed risk of bias. Because of heterogeneity across studies, only a narrative synthesis of the results was performed. Results Nine studies were included. Four demonstrated a positive effect on at least 1 measure of treatment choices for low back pain and acute whiplash. One involved a comparison with no intervention, and 3 involved a comparison with another active intervention. The interventions that demonstrated a positive effect included dissemination of clinical practice guidelines, with additional elements including interactive educational meetings (3 studies), tailored interventions and monitoring of the performance of health care delivery (1 study), peer assessment (1 study), and local opinion leaders plus educational outreach visits (1 study). Conclusions Although this review revealed limited trials evaluating interventions to increase physical therapists’ use of evidence-based treatments for musculoskeletal conditions compared with no intervention, it highlighted some interventions that may be effective. Impact Dissemination of clinical practice guidelines, interactive educational meetings, tailored interventions and monitoring the performance of health care delivery, peer assessment, and use of local opinion leaders plus educational outreach visits should be implemented to improve physical therapists’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines for a range of musculoskeletal conditions.

High Flow Oxygen Therapy and the Pressure to Feed Infants With Acute Respiratory Illness

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1006-1010
Author(s):  
Jennifer Raminick ◽  
Hema Desai
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Acute Respiratory Illness ◽  
High Flow Oxygen

Purpose Infants hospitalized for an acute respiratory illness often require the use of noninvasive respiratory support during the initial stage to improve their breathing. High flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is becoming a more popular means of noninvasive respiratory support, often used to treat respiratory syncytial virus/bronchiolitis. These infants present with tachypnea and coughing, resulting in difficulties in coordinating sucking and swallowing. However, they are often allowed to feed orally despite having high respiratory rate, increased work of breathing and on HFOT, placing them at risk for aspiration. Feeding therapists who work with these infants have raised concerns that HFOT creates an additional risk factor for swallowing dysfunction, especially with infants who have compromised airways or other comorbidities. There is emerging literature concluding changes in pharyngeal pressures with HFOT, as well as aspiration in preterm neonates who are on nasal continuous positive airway pressure. However, there is no existing research exploring the effect of HFOT on swallowing in infants with acute respiratory illness. This discussion will present findings from literature on HFOT, oral feeding in the acutely ill infant population, and present clinical practice guidelines for safe feeding during critical care admission for acute respiratory illness. Conclusion Guidelines for safety of oral feeds for infants with acute respiratory illness on HFOT do not exist. However, providers and parents continue to want to provide oral feeds despite clinical signs of respiratory distress and coughing. To address this challenge, we initiated a process change to use clinical bedside evaluation and a “cross-systems approach” to provide recommendations for safer oral feeds while on HFOT as the infant is recovering from illness. Use of standardized feeding evaluation and protocol have improved consistency of practice within our department. However, further research is still necessary to develop clinical practice guidelines for safe oral feeding for infants on HFOT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document