The role of psychosocial treatment in decreasing of future violence behavior risk in forensicly treated psychiatric patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 783-783
Author(s):  
S. Jonovska ◽  
V.Š. Jengić ◽  
L. Safner ◽  
G. Bošković ◽  
S. Zudenigo
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Violent Behavior ◽  
Psychosocial Treatment ◽  
Violence Risk ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Forensic Treatment ◽  
Aggression Questionnaire ◽  
Schizophrenic Group ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric ◽  
In The Beginning

The main aim of this study was to establish to what extent psychosocial treatment as a part of complex, multicomponent forensic treatment has an influence on decreasing of the future violence behavior risk in population of forensic psychiatric patients. We examinated 13 patients treated on Department of Forensic Psychiatry of Psychiatric Hospital Rab in Rab, Croatia. 9 of them were males and 4 of them females, 25–60 years of age, all of them were compulsory hospitalized because of committed criminal act connected with violent behavior. All of them have diagnosis of schizophrenic group of diseases with different duration of forensic treatment (from few months to few years). During 2010. all of them participated in psychosocial programe workshops once a week, for 6 months.MethodsViolence Risk Screening-10 (V-RISK-10), subjective measure of the programme chairmen performed in the beginning and in the end of the programme. The Aggression Questionnaire and Daily Spiritual Experience Scale as self-assesment scales were performed in the end of the programme. Results point on decreasing of V-RISK-10 results in the end of the programe in all participants. Interested observation was that mentioned results and those on self-assesment scales were not always been correlated positively. We also proved negative correlation between aggressivity and spirituality. As a conclusion, we have indications to believe that is real to expect that comining psychosocial treatment with targeted psuchopharmacological interventions could leed to decreasing the risk of future violent bihevior in forensicly treated psuchiatric patients.

scholarly journals Gender-Sensitive Violence Risk Assessment: Predictive Validity of Six Tools in Female Forensic Psychiatric Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivienne de Vogel ◽  
Mieke Bruggeman ◽  
Marike Lancel
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Management ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Violence Risk ◽  
Clinical Risk Management ◽  
Violence Risk Assessment ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric

Most violence risk assessment tools have been validated predominantly in males. In this multicenter study, the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 (HCR-20), Historical, Clinical, Risk Management–20 Version 3 (HCR-20V3), Female Additional Manual (FAM), Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START), Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF), and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) were coded on file information of 78 female forensic psychiatric patients discharged between 1993 and 2012 with a mean follow-up period of 11.8 years from one of four Dutch forensic psychiatric hospitals. Notable was the high rate of mortality (17.9%) and readmission to psychiatric settings (11.5%) after discharge. Official reconviction data could be retrieved from the Ministry of Justice and Security for 71 women. Twenty-four women (33.8%) were reconvicted after discharge, including 13 for violent offenses (18.3%). Overall, predictive validity was moderate for all types of recidivism, but low for violence. The START Vulnerability scores, HCR-20V3, and FAM showed the highest predictive accuracy for all recidivism. With respect to violent recidivism, only the START Vulnerability scores and the Clinical scale of the HCR-20V3 demonstrated significant predictive accuracy.

scholarly journals Childhood Trauma, the Combination of MAO-A and COMT Genetic Polymorphisms and the Joy of Being Aggressive in Forensic Psychiatric Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1008
Author(s):  
Michael Fritz ◽  
Franziska Rösel ◽  
Hannah Dobler ◽  
Judith Streb ◽  
Manuela Dudeck
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Polymorphisms ◽  
Childhood Trauma ◽  
Childhood Maltreatment ◽  
Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Violent Behavior ◽  
Reactive Aggression ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric Patients ◽  
Mao A ◽  
Forensic Psychiatric ◽  
Violent Offenses

Aggression and violent offenses are common amongst forensic psychiatric patients. Notably, research distinguishes two motivationally distinct dimension of aggression–instrumental and reactive aggression. Instrumental aggression comprises of appetitive, goal-directed aggressive acts, whereas reactive aggression consists of affective, defensive violence with both their biological basis remaining largely unknown. Childhood trauma and functional genetic polymorphisms in catecholamines converting enzymes, such as mono-amino-oxidase A (MAO-A) and catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) have been suggested to augment an aggressive behavioral response in adulthood. However, it warrants clarification if these factors influence one or both types of aggression. Furthermore, it remains elusive, if having a combination of unfavorable enzyme genotypes and childhood maltreatment further increases violent behavior. Hence, we set out to address these questions in the current study. First, analysis revealed an overall marginally increased frequency of the unfavorable MAO-A genotype in the test population. Second, each gene polymorphisms together with a traumatic childhood significantly increased the AFAS (Appetitive and Facilitative Aggression Scale) scores for both reactive and appetitive aggression. Third, having a combination of both disadvantageous genotypes and a negative childhood served as a minor positive predictor for increased reactive aggression, but had a strong influence on the joy of being aggressive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document