Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.I Donaldson ◽  
M.D Rugg
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Tang ◽  
Xueli Wang ◽  
Xing Peng ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractInhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to targets appearing on the same side as the cue (valid locations) than to targets appearing on the opposite side as the cue (invalid locations). Previous behaviour studies have found that the visual IOR is larger than the audiovisual IOR when focusing on both visual and auditory modalities. Utilising the high temporal resolution of the event-related potential (ERP) technique we explored the possible neural correlates with the behaviour IOR difference between visual and audiovisual targets. The behavioural results revealed that the visual IOR was larger than the audiovisual IOR. The ERP results showed that the visual IOR effect was generated from the P1 and N2 components, while the audiovisual IOR effect was derived only from the P3 component. Multisensory integration (MSI) of audiovisual targets occurred on the P1, N1 and P3 components, which may offset the reduced perceptual processing due to audiovisual IOR. The results of early and late differences in the neural processing of the visual IOR and audiovisual IOR imply that the two target types may have different inhibitory orientation mechanisms.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Engelmann ◽  
Lena A. Jäger ◽  
Shravan Vasishth

We present a comprehensive empirical evaluation of the ACT-R-based model of sentence processing developed by Lewis & Vasishth (2005) (LV05). The predictions of the model are compared with the results of a recent meta-analysis of published reading studies on retrieval interference in reflexive-/reciprocal-antecedent and subject-verb dependencies (Jäger, Engelmann, & Vasishth, 2017). The comparison shows that the model has only partial success in explaining the data; and we propose that its prediction space is restricted by oversimplifying assumptions. We then implement a revised model that takes into account differences between individual experimental designs in terms of the prominence of the target and the distractor in memory and context-dependent cue-feature associations. The predictions of the original and the revised model are quantitatively compared with the results of the meta-analysis. Our simulations show that, compared to the original LV05 model, the revised model accounts for the data better. The results suggest that effects of prominence and variable cue-feature associations need to be considered in the interpretation of existing empirical results and in the design and planning of future experiments. With regard to retrieval interference in sentence processing and to the broader field of psycholinguistic studies, we conclude that well-specified models in tandem with high-powered experiments are needed in order to uncover the underlying cognitive processes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1671-1681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea K. Pilgrim ◽  
Jamie G. Murray ◽  
David I. Donaldson

Episodic memory relies on both recollection and familiarity; why these processes are differentially engaged during retrieval remains unclear. Traditionally, recollection has been considered necessary for tasks requiring associative retrieval, whereas familiarity supports recognition of items. Recently, however, familiarity has been shown to contribute to associative recognition if stimuli are “unitized” at encoding (a single representation is created from multiple elements)—the “benefit” of unitization. Here, we ask if there is also a “cost” of unitization; are the elements of unitized representations less accessible via familiarity? We manipulated unitization during encoding and used ERPs to index familiarity and recollection at retrieval. The data revealed a selective reduction in the neural correlate of familiarity for individual words originally encoded in unitized compared with nonunitized word pairs. This finding reveals a measurable cost of unitization, suggesting that the nature of to-be-remembered stimuli is critical in determining whether familiarity contributes to episodic memory.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas Kota ◽  
Michael D. Rugg ◽  
Bradley C. Lega

1.AbstractModels of memory formation posit that recollection as compared to familiarity-based memory depends critically on the hippocampus, which binds features of an event to its context. For this reason, the contrast between study items that are later recollected versus those that are recognized on the basis of familiarity should reveal electrophysiological patterns in the hippocampus selectively involved in associative memory encoding. Extensive data from studies in rodents support a model in which theta oscillations fulfill this role, but results in humans results have not been as clear. Here, we employed an associative recognition memory procedure to identify hippocampal correlates of successful associative memory encoding and retrieval in patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. We identified a dissociation between 2– 5 Hz and 5–9 Hz theta oscillations, by which 2–5 Hz oscillations uniquely were linked with successful associative memory in both the anterior and posterior hippocampus. These oscillations exhibited a significant phase reset that also predicted successful associative encoding, distinguished recollected from familiar items at retrieval, and contributed to reinstatement of encoding-related patterns that distinguished these items. Our results provide direct electrophysiological evidence that 2–5 Hz hippocampal theta oscillations support the encoding and retrieval of memories based on recollection but not familiarity.2.Significance StatementExtensive fMRI evidence suggests that the hippocampus plays a selective role in recollection rather than familiarity, during both encoding and retrieval. However, there is little or no electrophysiological evidence that speaks to whether the hippocampus is selectively involved in recollection. Here, we used intracranial EEG from human participants engaged in an associative recognition paradigm. The findings suggest that oscillatory power and phase reset in the hippocampus are selectively associated with recollection rather than familiarity-based memory judgements. Furthermore, reinstatement of oscillatory patterns in the hippocampus was stronger for successful recollection than familiarity. Collectively, the findings support a role for hippocampal theta oscillations in human episodic memory.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Koshkin ◽  
Yury Shtyrov ◽  
Alex Ossadtchi

AbstractWe utilized the event-related potential (ERP) technique to study neural activity associated with different levels of working memory (WM) load during simultaneous interpretation (SI) in an ecologically valid setting. The amplitude of N1 and P1 components elicited by task-irrelevant tone probes was significantly modulated as a function of WM load but not the direction of interpretation. Furthermore, the latency of the N1 increased insignificantly with WM load. The P1 latency, however, mostly did not depend on either WM load or direction of interpretation. Larger negativity under lower WM loads suggests deeper processing of the auditory stimuli, providing tentative electrophysiological evidence in support of the Efforts Model of SI. Relationships between the direction of interpretation and median WM load are also discussed.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1455 ◽  
pp. 90-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zara M. Bergström ◽  
Richard J. O'Connor ◽  
Martin K.-H. Li ◽  
Jon S. Simons

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document