Absence of correlation between risk factors for endometrial cancer and the presence of tamoxifen-associated endometrial polyps in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 40-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Timmerman ◽  
J Deprest ◽  
R Verbesselt ◽  
P Moerman ◽  
J De Brabanter ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
A O Mueck ◽  
H Seeger

Endometrial carcinoma is listed under the absolute contraindications to hormone therapy (HT). According to current opinion, HT after stage I or II is still considered an option, and continuous combined oestrogen/progestogen replacement therapy (CCEPT) would be recommended. However, up to now, only observational studies have been put forward. Although none of these studies have established an increased rate of recurrence or mortality, alternatives such as phytopreparations and tibolone, or particular psychotherapeutic drugs, such as venlafaxine, should be considered for the relief of climacteric complaints. Progestogen-only therapy (PT) particularly has been considered. However, the currently discussed possible progestogen effects regarding an increased risk of breast cancer have to be taken into account. Indeed, the wider discussion about the gestagen effects regarding the risk of breast cancer is to be considered. Generally, after hysterectomy, at least for patients with cardiovascular risk factors, the preference today is to use low-dose oestrogen therapy (patches or gels) instead of CCEPT, and this is also now recommended for patients after endometrial cancer. This is to be noted because of the risk factors for endometrial carcinoma, such as hypertension, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCO) and diabetes mellitus. However, each form of HT should be only exceptionally recommended, and the patients must be informed about the risks that exist and the use of alternatives.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-183
Author(s):  
정지혜 ◽  
여미진 ◽  
박애령 ◽  
황보신이 ◽  
나현오 ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 132-138
Author(s):  
O.V. Paliychuk ◽  
◽  
L.Z. Polishchuk ◽  
Z.I. Rossokha ◽  
◽  
...  

The objective: determining gene polymorphism features ERS1, CYP2D6 in patients with breast cancer (RHZ) and endometrial cancer (EC) and the impact assessment studied genetic characteristics compared to receptor status (immunohistochemical determination of expression levels of ER, PR) tumors and the results of the treatment. Patients and methods. article presents the results of complex clinical, morphological, clinical-genealogical, and molecular-genetic examination of 28 females: 19 patients with breast cancer (BC), 9 patients with endometrial cancer (EC), including 5 patients with primary-multiple tumors (PMT) with and without tumor pathology aggregation in families. Results. The It was determined that in patients’ families malignant tumors of breast, uterine body and/or ovaries prevail that corresponds to Lynch type II syndrome (family cancer syndrome). Molecular-genetic examination of genomic DNA of peripheral blood and histological sections for the presence of SNPs of ESR and CYP2D6*4 genes comparing with the results of immunohistochemical study of tumors for receptors ER and PR status have not found associations between these characteristics; although among EC patients the occurrence of genotypes 397ТТ and 351АА was significantly higher comparing with BC patients (55.55% and 10.5% for genotype 397ТТ,and 15.8% for genotype 351АА, respectively). At the same time the patients with BC and primary-multiple tumors (PMT) of female reproductive system organs (FRSO) that carried mutations in BRCA1 in all the cases demonstrated positive ER and PR receptor status and adverse combinations of polymorphous variants of the genes ESR1 (397СС, 397ТС) and CYP2D6*4 (1846G, 1846GA), suggesting combined effect of these factors on the development of malignant neoplasias of FRSO in families with positive family cancer history. In BC patients, receiving standard hormone therapy with tamoxifen, those, who had genotype 1846GG of the gene CYP2D6*4, in 3 patients (15.8%) of 19 (100%) patients disease recurrence was diagnosed. Conclusion. The obtained results allow clinical use of the assessment of polymorphism frequency of the genes ESR1 and CYP2D6*4 for selection of individual hormone therapy regimens schemes for BC patients, to increase efficacy of dispensary observation after finishing of special therapy for such patients, and also personalization of complex and combined treatment regimens. Key words: breast cancer, endometrial cancer, family cancer syndrome, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the genes ESR1, CYP2D6*4.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-465
Author(s):  
Lev Bershteyn ◽  
Dmitriy Vasilev ◽  
Tatyana Poroshina ◽  
Igor Berlev

Increased frequency of endometrial cancer (EC) since the beginning of this century exceeds that of breast cancer and to a large extent can be attributed to dynamics of parameters, which characterize hormonal and metabolic status of ill women and molecular genetic landscape of transforming endometrium. During the past few years there are suggested several options for a personalized assessment of the risk of EC. The aim of this article is to propose and justify own version of this score with the idea of its further not only retrospective but also prospective testing both in relation to the risk of developing endometrial cancer as well as an additional marker helping to predict tumor response to treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document