608 Matched Pair Analysis Comparing Breast Conservation (BCT) with Immediate Techniques of Oncoplastic Surgery (iTOP): Morbidity and Cosmetic Assessment

2012 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S222
Author(s):  
S. Adam ◽  
P. Dubsky ◽  
R. Exner ◽  
S. Biegenzahn ◽  
P. Panhofer ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
U. Mahmood ◽  
C. G. Morris ◽  
G. A. Neuner ◽  
M. Koshy ◽  
S. Kesmodel ◽  
...  

85 Background: Previous studies have shown that young women with breast cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy (BCT) experience higher local recurrence rates. Whether such patients are better treated with mastectomy is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes of young women with early-stage breast cancer treated with BCT or mastectomy using a large, population-based database. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, information was obtained for all female patients age 20 to 39 diagnosed with T1-2 N0-1 M0 breast cancer between 1990 and 2007 who underwent either BCT (lumpectomy and radiation treatment) or mastectomy. Multivariable analysis as well as a matched pair analysis were performed to compare overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) of patients undergoing BCT and mastectomy. Results: 14,760 women were identified, of whom 45% received BCT and 55% received mastectomy. Median follow-up was 5.7 years (range: 0.5 to 17.9 years). Multivariable analysis revealed year of diagnosis, age, race/ethnicity, grade, PR status, tumor size, number of lymph nodes positive, and number of lymph nodes examined were independent predictors of OS and CSS while ER status was of borderline significance. After accounting for all patient and tumor characteristics, multivariable analysis found that BCT resulted in similar OS (HR: 0.93; CI: 0.83-1.04; p = 0.16) and CSS (HR: 0.93, CI: 0.83-1.05; p = 0.26) as mastectomy. Matched pair analysis, including 4,644 BCT and mastectomy patients, confirmed no difference in OS or CSS: the 5/10/15-year OS for BCT and mastectomy were 92.5%/83.5%/77.0% and 91.9%/83.6%/79.1%, respectively (p = 0.99) and the 5/10/15-year CSS for BCT and mastectomy were 93.3%/85.5%/79.9% and 92.5%/85.5%/81.9%, respectively (p = 0.88). Conclusions: Young women with early-stage breast cancer have equivalent survival whether treated with BCT or mastectomy. These patients should be counseled appropriately regarding their treatment options, and should not choose a mastectomy based on the assumption of improved survival.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-73
Author(s):  
Lars Osterbrink ◽  
Paul Alpar ◽  
Alexander Seher

AbstractReviewing and rating are important features of many social media websites, but they are found on many e-commerce sites too. The combination of social interaction and e-commerce is sometimes referred to as social commerce to indicate that people are supporting each other in the process of buying goods and services. Rgeviews of other consumers have a significant effect on consumer choice because they are usually considered authentic and more trustworthy than information presented by a vendor. The collaborative effort of consumers helps to make the right purchase decision (or prevent from a wrong one). The effect of reviews has often been researched in terms of helpfulness as indicated by their readers. Images are an important factor of helpfulness in reviews of experience goods where personal tastes and use play an important role. We extend this research to search goods where objective characteristics seem to prevail. In addition, we analyze potential interaction with other variables. The empirical study is performed with regression analyses on 3,483 search good reviews from Amazon.com followed by a matched pair analysis of 186 review pairs. We find that images have a significant positive effect on helpfulness of reviews of search goods too. This is especially true in case of short and ambiguous reviews.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
R. Stein ◽  
A. Schröder ◽  
T. Hagen ◽  
J.W. Thüroff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document