3217 First-line chemotherapy treatment in the management of mantle cell lymphoma: A systematic review

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. S654
Author(s):  
S. Stradwick ◽  
K. Gairy ◽  
D. Seshagiri
2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-351
Author(s):  
Umberto Falcone ◽  
Haiyan Jiang ◽  
Shaheena Bashir ◽  
Richard Tsang ◽  
Vishal Kukreti ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5263-5263
Author(s):  
Karin Hohloch ◽  
Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Roberto E. Cacchione ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
...  

To assess the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 90yttrium-ibrutinib-tiuxetan (90Y-IT) in mantle cell lymphoma, data from 90 patients registered in the RIT Network with a median follow-up (FU) of 5.5 years after RIT were evaluated. 90Y-IT was given as first-line therapy in 45 (50%) (consolidation 44 pts., primary therapy 1 pt.) and at relapse in 45 (50%) patients (consolidation 24 pts., recurrence 12 pts., therapy refractory 3 pts., conditioning 2 pts., other 4 pts.). As a first-line treatment, 30 patients (pts.) (67%) achieved CR, 10 pts. (22%) PR%., 1 pt. (2%) PD, and for 4 pts. (9%) no response data was available. At relapse, CR was achieved in 17 pts. (38%), PR in 6 pts. (13%), SD in 2 pts. (4%), and 6 pts. (13%) had PD, while the response was not documented for 14 pts. (31%). After a median FU of 5.5 years, median PFS for all patients was 2.11 (95%CI: 1.03-2.32) years, and median OS was 4.05 (95%CI 2.79-7.21) years. Eleven pts. (12.2%) developed second malignancy. In conclusion, this is the largest report of MCL pts. treated with 90Y-IT to date. 90Y-IT was most often used as consolidation after first- and second-line chemotherapy and may improve the results achieved using chemoimmunotherapy alone. However, the results are less encouraging compared to treatment with small molecules such as ibrutinib. Disclosures Zinzani: TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy. Jurczak:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celtrion: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Truemper:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy. Scholz:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Hexal: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; GILEAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankio: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Yttrium 90 (90Y) Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin) is approved for treatment of patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma and as consolidation therapy after chemo(immuno)therapy of patients with follicular lymphoma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Sergio Augusto Buzian Brasil ◽  
Carolina Colaço ◽  
Tomas Barrese ◽  
Roberto P. Paes ◽  
Cristina Bortolheiro ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (15) ◽  
pp. 3486-3494
Author(s):  
Diego Villa ◽  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Cynthia L. Toze ◽  
Kevin Song ◽  
...  

Abstract Rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimens constitute standard first-line therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Since June 2013, 190 patients ≥18 years of age with MCL in British Columbia have been treated with bendamustine and rituximab (BR). The overall response rate to BR was 88% (54% complete response). Of these, 61 of 89 patients (69%) aged ≤65 years received autologous stem cell transplantation and 141 of 190 patients (74%) from the entire cohort received maintenance rituximab. Twenty-three patients (12%) had progressive disease, associated with high risk per the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI), Ki-67 ≥50%, and blastoid/pleomorphic histology. Outcomes were compared with a historical cohort of 248 patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP; January 2003 to May 2013). Treatment with BR was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), compared with R-CHOP in the whole cohort (3-year PFS, 66% BR vs 51% R-CHOP, P = .003; 3-year OS, 73% BR vs 66% R-CHOP, P = .054) and in those >65 years of age (3-year PFS, 56% BR vs 35% R-CHOP, P = .001; 3-year OS, 64% BR vs 55% R-CHOP, P = .063). Outcomes in transplanted patients were not statistically significantly different compared with R-CHOP (3-year PFS, 85% BR vs 76% R-CHOP, P = .135; 3-year OS, 90% BR vs 88% R-CHOP, P = .305), although in multivariate analyses, treatment with BR was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.94]; P = .036) but not OS. BR is an effective first-line option for most patients with MCL, however, outcomes are suboptimal for those with high-risk features and further studies integrating novel agents are warranted.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2791-2791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remy Gressin ◽  
Roch Houot ◽  
Mario Ojeda Uribe ◽  
Christiane Mounier ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2791 Introduction: Elderly mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients (pts) do not benefit from dose-intensive chemotherapy upfront.1 The GOELAMS group recently demonstrated that a regimen comprising Vincristine/Adriamycine/Dexamethasone plus Chlorambucil (VAD+C) was well tolerated, had a good efficacy/toxicity profile and induced similar PFS than R-CHOP (median PFS between 16 to 18 months2,3,4). Additionally, it has been shown that bortezomib (Velcade®), with or without Rituximab has efficacy in relapsed/refractory MCL patients5,6. These data prompted, our group to conducte a phase II prospective non randomized clinical trial evaluating the combination of Velcade plus Rituximab/Adriblastine/Dexamethasone/Chlorambucil (RiPAD+C) as a first line therapy for elderly MCL patients. Aims: To evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) and toxicity after 4 cycles of RiPAD+C regimen (main objective) and to evaluate prognostic factors for survival (secondary objective). Protocol: RiPAD+C : Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on d1 (and d8 for cycle 1); PS 341, Velcade® 1.3 mg/m2 on d1, 4, 8 and 11; Adriblastine 9mg/m2/d as a continuous infusion for 4 days; Dexamethasone 20 mgx2/d from d1 to d4; Chlorambucil 12 mg/d, d20 to d29. Repeat cycles every 35d. After 4 cycles, responding pts (Cheson 1999 criteria) received 2 additional cycles for a maximum of 6. Patients and methods: Inclusion criteria: All untreated elderly (65 to 80 years old) MCL patients (including blastoid forms) presenting with a stage II to IV disease with a good PS (ECOG<3) were eligible. Histologic samples were centrally reviewed and Ki67 expression was evaluated for each sample according to the European guidelines7. Results: Population: from June 2007 to December 2009, 39 pts were enrolled in the study with a majority of males (n=30). Median age at diagnosis was 72 years [65-80]. All patients had stage III/IV disease and PS was ≥2 in 5 cases (15%). Elevated serum LDH were observed in 47% of cases. According to the MIPI, 28 patients (80%) had an intermediate or high score. Eleven (30%) patients presented with a blastoid variant and Ki67 staining was superior to 30% in 12 cases (37%). Toxicity: A total of 195 courses have been performed. Fourteen hospitalization (median duration = 7 days [1 and 55]) due to toxicity were necessary involving 12 pts (34%). Seven pts (18%) experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. ten (25%) pts required blood transfusions for a total of 8 red blood cells and 14 platelets transfusions. Response after 4 cycles: ORR was 80% (n=31) including 51% of CRs. Eight pts discontinued the treatment before reaching cycle 4, two of them for toxicity reasons. Six patients (15%) were refractory or in progression. Response after 6 cycles (n=25; 64%): ORR was 74% including 20 pts in CRs (59%). Survival: With a median follow-up of 24 months, 27 pts are still alive. Two pts died of toxicity (severe sepsis) and 10 pts progressed. The median PFS is 26 months and the median OS has not been reached yet. According to the MIPI score, no differences in PFS were between pts with low and int/high scores. Conversely, the recently described Goelams index2 stratified pts with a low score (normal LDH, Ki67≤26%, PS≤1, and no B symptoms) from patients with an int/high score (p=.055). Conclusion: The results of the current phase II trial indicate that the RiPAD+C regimen, integrating bortezomib, is feasible and well tolerated as a first line therapy in elderly MCL pts. Historical comparisons suggest that this regimen compares favourably to the classical R-CHOP regimen in terms of response rates and duration. Bibliography: 1 Romaguera JE et al, JCO 2005; 2 Gressin R et al., Haematological 2010; 3 Howard OM et al., JCO 2002; 4 Lenz G et al., Blood 2005; 5 Fisher RI et al., JCO 2006; 6 Goy A et al., JCO 2009; 7 Klapper W et al., Haematopathol 2009. Disclosures: Off Label Use: velcade is of label in France for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (18) ◽  
pp. 4808-4816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Griffiths ◽  
Joseph Mikhael ◽  
Michelle Gleeson ◽  
Mark Danese ◽  
Martin Dreyling

Abstract Clinical trials have demonstrated that rituximab improves overall survival in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), except in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We used Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)–Medicare data to compare survival in older MCL patients who began chemotherapy with or without rituximab within 180 days of diagnosis. Patients were followed from diagnosis (January 1999 to December 2005) until death or the end of observation (December 2007). Medicare administrative and claims data were used to identify the date and cause of death and the immunochemotherapy regimen. Of 638 patients, the mean age at diagnosis was 75 years, 75% had stage III/IV disease, 67% had extranodal involvement, and 64% received rituximab. The average length of first-line treatment was 21 weeks, with no difference between the 2 groups (P = .76). Median survival was 27 months for chemotherapy alone, compared with 37 months for chemotherapy plus rituximab (P < .001). In multivariate analysis of 2-year survival, rituximab plus chemotherapy was associated with lower all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.82; P < .01), and cancer-specific (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.84; P < .01) mortality. Results were similar when using the entire observation period, propensity score analysis, and limiting chemotherapy to CHOP/CHOP-like. We conclude that first-line chemotherapy including rituximab is associated with significantly improved survival in older patients diagnosed with MCL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document