Pomalidomide: Thalidomide analogue for multiple myeloma

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Maria G. Tanzi
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ali Erkurt ◽  
Fehmi Hindilerden ◽  
Omer Ekinci ◽  
Jale Yildiz ◽  
Mehmet Sinan Dal ◽  
...  

Objective: Pomalidomide is a new generation thalidomide analogue. Effectiveness as a single agent or combination with low dose dexamethasone has been in the treatment of relapse/refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM). The aim of the present study was to share the experience of different oncology centres with pomalidomide treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Materials and Methods: Seventy-three patients from 16 centres were enrolled into the study. The patients were followed for a median of 6 months. Relapsed/refractory MM patients who received at least one line of treatment before pomalidomide were included into the study.  ISS, R-ISS and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of the patients and treatment-related side effects were evaluated. Results: As a result of the median follow-up for 6 months, 36% (26/72) of the patients presented progression. The estimated median PFS was found 29 months. The Cox regression analysis revealed that ECOG affected PFS only, myeloma subtype; ISS and R-ISS scores did not affect PFS. The most common side effects with pomalidomide treatment in our population include neutropenia, infections, anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: In our study, it was statistically shown that the ECOG score was effective in survival in relapsed / refractory MM patients treated by pomalidomide. Therefore, we recommend evaluation of the ECOG score for each patient before treatment in eligible cases.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6074-6074
Author(s):  
C. Angelotta ◽  
A. J. Lurie ◽  
P. R. Yarnold ◽  
S. Singhal ◽  
J. Mehta ◽  
...  

6074 Background: Half of cancer therapies are used off-label, but regulations prohibit package inserts from describing toxicities that occur only in these settings. In 2003, RADAR reported VTE rates of 20% to 62% when thalidomide, approved for leprosy treatment, was used off-label (with dexamethasone) for multiple myeloma. In 2005, the Connecticut attorney general requested that a black box warn of high rates of VTE when thalidomide is used off-label. Subsequently, the thalidomide analogue, lenalidomide, received FDA approval as a myelodysplasia therapy. In phase II/III trials, multiple myeloma response rates were 60% to 92% with lenalidomide/dex therapy. Methods: Published literature, abstracts, and package inserts were reviewed for VTE rates in lenalidomide-treated multiple myeloma. Results: VTE rates were 8.5% to 75% in multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dex or erythropoietin; rates were <3.4% when aspirin prophylaxis was added. The FDA approved package insert for lenalidomide preemptively includes a black box warning describing high VTE rates with off-label use of lenalidomide and advises physicians that VTE prophylaxis should be considered, although the effectiveness of various prophylaxis regimens is unknown. Conclusions: Six months after the attorney general requested that a black box warning describe high VTE rates with off-label use of thalidomide, the manufacturer preemptively included an analogous black box warning in the package insert for the thalidomide analogue, lenalidomide, but did not include similar warnings for this toxicity in the package insert for thalidomide. The FDA should require that package inserts describe severe toxicities that commonly occur with off-label use of cancer therapies. This is especially important for severe class-related toxicities such as lenalidomide- and thalidomide- associated VTE. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1194-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond A. McCarthy ◽  
Marion G. Macey ◽  
Matthew Streetly ◽  
Stephen A. Schey ◽  
K. Alun Brown

2005 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 205-218
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Nicholas Mitsiades ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson

The ubiquitin–proteasome pathway is a principle intracellular mechanism for controlled protein degradation and has recently emerged as an attractive target for anticancer therapies, because of the pleiotropic cell-cycle regulators and modulators of apoptosis that are controlled by proteasome function. In this chapter, we review the current state of the field of proteasome inhibitors and their prototypic member, bortezomib, which was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced multiple myeloma. Particular emphasis is placed on the pre-clinical research data that became the basis for eventual clinical applications of proteasome inhibitors, an overview of the clinical development of this exciting drug class in multiple myeloma, and a appraisal of possible uses in other haematological malignancies, such non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.


2000 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1118-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bellahcene ◽  
I. Van Riet ◽  
C. de Greef ◽  
N. Antoine ◽  
M. F. Young ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 240-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith E. Davies ◽  
Andrew C. Rawstron ◽  
Roger G. Owen ◽  
Gareth J. Morgan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document