Medical Oncologists and Risk Management in Breast Cancer

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-172
Author(s):  
Daniel F. Hayes
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (28) ◽  
pp. 2998-3004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Raigon-Ponferrada ◽  
María E.D. Recio ◽  
Jose L. Guerrero-Orriach ◽  
Alfredo Malo-Manso ◽  
Juan J. Escalona-Belmonte ◽  
...  

: Breast cancer is a complex heterogeneous disease that is categorized into several histological and genomic subtypes with relevant prognostic and therapeutical implications. Such diversity requires a multidisciplinary approach for a comprehensive treatment that will involve surgeons, radiotherapists and medical oncologists. Breast cancer is classified as either local (or locoregional), which stands for 90-95% of cases, or metastatic, representing 5% of cases. : The management of breast cancer will be determined by the stage of the disease. The treatment of local breast cancer is based on surgery and/or radiotherapy. Systemic breast cancer requires chemotherapy and/or endocrine and/or biological therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. e24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louisa L Lo ◽  
Ian M Collins ◽  
Mathias Bressel ◽  
Phyllis Butow ◽  
Jon Emery ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1659-1670
Author(s):  
Claire C. Conley ◽  
Monica L. Kasting ◽  
Bianca M. Augusto ◽  
Jennifer D. Garcia ◽  
Deborah Cragun ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (33) ◽  
pp. 2713-2722
Author(s):  
Bruce Feinberg ◽  
Skyler Hime ◽  
Jeff Wojtynek ◽  
Igoni Dokubo ◽  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
...  

Aim: Guidelines list atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel (ANP) as the preferred first-line (1L) therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with PD-L1 expression ≥1%, but which clinical attributes impact ANP prescribing? Materials & methods: Medical oncologists participated in a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with four hypothetical mTNBC clinical scenarios to assess influences of: PD-L1 expression, menopausal status, prior adjuvant therapy and bulky liver metastases. Results: A total of 47% chose ANP in 1L irrespective of menopausal status, prior adjuvant therapy or tumor bulk. PD-L1 expression was the only attribute with a significant impact on ANP preference, with 69% choosing ANP for those with ≥1% expression versus only 26% for those with <1% (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: ANP choice for 1L mTNBC deviated from guidelines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e1304-e1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Poggio ◽  
Marco Tagliamento ◽  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Valentino Martelli ◽  
Andrea De Maria ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the attitudes and practice of Italian oncologists toward breast cancer care and related research activities. METHODS: A 29-question anonymous online survey was sent by e-mail to members of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology and the Italian Breast Cancer Study Group on April 3, 2020. Only medical oncologists (both those in training and specialists) were invited to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: Out of 165 responding oncologists, 121 (73.3.%) worked in breast units. In the (neo)adjuvant setting, compared with before the emergency, fewer oncologists adopted weekly paclitaxel (68.5% v 93.9%) and a dose-dense schedule for anthracycline-based chemotherapy (43% v 58.8%) during the COVID-19 outbreak. In the metastatic setting, compared with before the emergency, fewer oncologists adopted first-line weekly paclitaxel for HER2-positive disease (41.8% v 53.9%) or CDK4/6 inhibitors for luminal tumors with less-aggressive characteristics (55.8% v 80.0%) during the COVID-19 outbreak. A significant change was also observed in delaying the timing for monitoring therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors, assessing treatment response with imaging tests, and flushing central venous devices. Clinical research and scientific activities were reduced in 80.3% and 80.1% of respondents previously implicated in these activities, respectively. CONCLUSION: Medical oncologists face many challenges in providing cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak. Although most of the changes in their attitudes and practice were reasonable responses to the current health care emergency without expected major negative impact on patient outcomes, some potentially alarming signals of undertreatment were observed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1222-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elysia Donovan ◽  
Sukhbinder Dhesy‐Thind ◽  
Som Mukherjee ◽  
Michael Kucharczyk ◽  
Anand Swaminath

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document