scholarly journals Rapid Expansion and IL-4 Expression by Leishmania-Specific Naive Helper T Cells In Vivo

Immunity ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel B Stetson ◽  
Markus Mohrs ◽  
Valerie Mallet-Designe ◽  
Luc Teyton ◽  
Richard M Locksley
1981 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
G G Miller ◽  
P I Nadler ◽  
Y Asano ◽  
R J Hodes ◽  
D H Sachs

Treatment of BALB/c mice with purified pig anti-(BALB/c anti-nuclease) anti-idiotypic antibodies has been found to induce the appearance of idiotype-bearing immunoglobulins (Id') in the serum of these mice in the absence of detectable antigen binding activity. This phenomenon appeared to require T cells in the hosts because no Id' was detected in the serum of nude mice similarly treated. Furthermore, the spleens of BALB/c mice treated with anti-idiotype were found to contain helper T cells capable of providing help in an in vitro plaque-forming cell response to trinitrophenyl-nuclease equivalent to that provided by helper T cells from the spleens of nuclease-primed animals. Helper T cells from both anti-idiotype-treated and nuclease-treated animals were found to be antigen-specific and to be similarly susceptible to elimination by treatment with anti-idiotype plus complement. Therefore, treatment with both antigen and anti-idiotype appeared to prime similar populations of antigen-specific helper T cells, while having different effects on the induction of antibody. These findings are consistent with the network theory of receptor interactions in the immune response, and may provide a means for studying individual cell populations involved in such interactions.


1978 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 1282-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
CW Pierce ◽  
JA Kapp

The ability of spleen cells from (responder X nonresponder)F(1) mice immunized with various GAT-Mφ, GAT-MBSA, and soluble GAT to develop IgG GAT-specific PFC responses in vitro after stimulation with responder and nonresponder parental and F(1) GAT-Mφ, was investigated. F(1) spleen cells from mice immunized with F(1) GAT-Mφ or GAT-MBSA developed secondary responses to responder and nonresponder parental and F(1) GAT- Mφ, but not to unrelated third party GAT-Mφ. Spleen cells from F(1) mice immunized with either parental GAT-Mφ developed secondary responses to F(1) GAT-Mφ and only the parental GAT-Mφ used for immunization in vivo. Soluble GAT-primed F(1) spleen cells responded to F(1) and responder parental, but not nonresponder parental, GAT-Mφ. Simultaneous immunization in vivo with the various GAT-Mφ or GAT-MBSA plus soluble GAT modulated the response pattern of these F(1) spleen cells such that they developed secondary responses only to F(1) and parental responder GAT-Mφ regardless of the response pattern observed after immunization with the various GAT-Mφ or GAT-MBSA alone. These observations demonstrate the critical importance of the physical state of the GAT used for immunization in determining the subsequent response pattern of immune F(1) spleen cells to the parental and F(1) GAT-Mφ. Further, suppressor T cells, capable of inhibiting primary responses to GAT by virgin F(1) spleen cells stimulated by nonresponder parental GAT-Mφ, were demonstrated in spleens of F(1) mice immunized with soluble GAT, but not those primed with F(1) GAT-Mφ. Because responder parental mice develop both helper and suppressor T cells after immunization with GAT-Mφ, and soluble GAT preferentially stimulates suppressor T cells whereas GAT-Mφ stimulate helper T cells in nonresponder parental mice, these observations suggest that distinct subsets of T cells exist in F(1) mice which behave phenotypically as responder and nonresponder parental T cells after immunization with soluble GAT and GAT- Mφ.


2005 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 879-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udayasankar Kumaraguru ◽  
Kaustuv Banerjee ◽  
Barry T. Rouse

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e84415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Debuisson ◽  
Nathalie Mari ◽  
Sébastien Denanglaire ◽  
Oberdan Leo ◽  
Fabienne Andris

1990 ◽  
Vol 172 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kitagawa ◽  
S Sato ◽  
S Hori ◽  
T Hamaoka ◽  
H Fujiwara

The intravenous sensitization of C57BL/6 (B6) mice with class I H-2-disparate B6-C-H-2bm1 (bm1) spleen cells resulted in the abrogation of CD8+ T cell-mediated anti-bm1 (proliferative and interleukin 2-producing) T helper (Th) cell activities. In vitro stimulation of lymphoid cells from these mice with bm1 cells, however, generated a reduced, but appreciable, anti-bm1 cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response. Moreover, the anti-bm1 CTL response, upon stimulation with [bm1 x B6-C-H-2bm12 (bm12)]F1 spleen cells, was enhanced when compared with the response induced upon stimulation with bm1 cells. These in vitro results were reflected on in vivo graft rejection responses; bm1 skin grafts engrafted in the bm1-presensitized B6 mice exhibited prolonged survival, whereas (bm1 x bm12)F1 grafts placed collateral to bm1 grafts (dual engrafted mice) inhibited the tolerance to bm1. In the B6 mice 1-2 d after rejecting the bm1 grafts, anti-bm1 Th activities remained marginal, whereas potent anti-bm1 CTL responses were found to be generated from their spleen cells. Administration in vivo of anti-CD4 antibody into bm1-presensitized, dual graft-engrafted mice prolonged bm1 graft survival and interfered with enhanced induction of anti-bm1 CTL activity. These results indicate that anti-class I alloantigen (bm1) tolerance as induced by intravenous presensitization with the relevant antigens is not ascribed to the elimination of CD8+ CTL precursors, but to the specific inactivation of CD8+ Th cells, whose function can be bypassed by activating third-party Th cells.


1979 ◽  
Vol 149 (5) ◽  
pp. 1208-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Singer ◽  
K S Hathcock ◽  
R J Hodes

Requirements for helper T-cell recognition of H-2 determinants expressed on adherent accessory cells and on B cells was individually assessed in the anti-hapten PFC responses to TNP-KLH. Complicating allogeneic effects were minimized or avoided by the use of helper T cells from normal F1 hybrids, parent leads to F1 chimeras, and F1 leads to parent chimeras. The results of both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that: (a) helper T cells are not required to recognize the identical H-2 determinants on both accessory cells and B cells; (b) helper T cells are required to recognize K or I-A region-encoded determinants expressed on accessory cells; (c) no requirement was observed in vitro or in vivo for helper T-cell recognition of B-cell-expressed H-2 determinants; and (d) no requirement was observed for H-2 homology between accessory cells and B cells. The absence of required helper T-cell recognition of the identical H-2 determinants on both accessory cells and B cells was demonstrated in two ways: (a) naive of KLH-primed (A x B)F1 hybrid helper T cells collaborated equally well with B cells from either parentA or parentB in the presence of accessory cells from either parent; (b) A leads to (A x B)F1 chimeric spleen cells depleted of accessory cells collaborated equally well with accessory cells from either parentA or parentB, even though the B cells only expressed the H-2 determinants of parentA. A requirement for helper T-cell recognition of K or I-A region-encoded H-2 determinants on accessory cells was also demonstrated in two ways: (a) (A x B)F1 leads to parentA chimeric spleen cells depleted of accessory cells collaborated with accessory cells from parentA but not parentB; and (b) (A x B)F1 leads to parentA chimeric helper T cells collaborated with normal F1 B cells only in the presence of parental or recombinant accessory cells that expressed the K or I-A region-encoded determinants of parentA. Although restricted in their ability to recognize H-2 determinants on accessory cells, it was demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo that (A x B)F1 leads to parentA chimeric helper T cells were able to collaborate with B cells from either parentA or parentB. In vitro in the presence of accessory cells from parentA, (A x B)F1 leads to parentA chimeric helper T cells collaborated equally well with B cells from either parent. In addition, the inability of (A x B)F1 leads to parentA chimeric helper T cells to collaborate with (B + accessory) cells from parentB was successfully reversed by the addition of parentA SAC as added accessory cells. In vivo, upon the addition of parentA accessory cells, (A x B)F1 leads to parentA chimeric helper T cells collaborated with parentB B cells in short-term adoptive transfer experiments.


2009 ◽  
Vol 206 (4) ◽  
pp. 751-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylie E. Webster ◽  
Stacey Walters ◽  
Rachel E. Kohler ◽  
Tomas Mrkvan ◽  
Onur Boyman ◽  
...  

Via a transcription factor, Foxp3, immunoregulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells (T reg cells) play an important role in suppressing the function of other T cells. Adoptively transferring high numbers of T reg cells can reduce the intensity of the immune response, thereby providing an attractive prospect for inducing tolerance. Extending our previous findings, we describe an in vivo approach for inducing rapid expansion of T reg cells by injecting mice with interleukin (IL)-2 mixed with a particular IL-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Injection of these IL-2–IL-2 mAb complexes for a short period of 3 d induces a marked (>10-fold) increase in T reg cell numbers in many organs, including the liver and gut as well as the spleen and lymph nodes, and a modest increase in the thymus. The expanded T reg cells survive for 1–2 wk and are highly activated and display superior suppressive function. Pretreating with the IL-2–IL-2 mAb complexes renders the mice resistant to induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; combined with rapamycin, the complexes can also be used to treat ongoing disease. In addition, pretreating mice with the complexes induces tolerance to fully major histocompatibility complex–incompatible pancreatic islets in the absence of immunosuppression. Tolerance is robust and the majority of grafts are accepted indefinitely. The approach described for T reg cell expansion has clinical potential for treating autoimmune disease and promoting organ transplantation.


1986 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Spinozzi ◽  
Roberto Guerciolini ◽  
Roberto Gerli ◽  
Ivano Gernini ◽  
Francesco Rondoni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document