scholarly journals PCN71 A COMPARISON OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ZOLEDRONIC ACID FOR PREVENTING SKELETAL-RELATED EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH BONE METASTASES FROM PROSTATE CANCER IN 4 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. A264
Author(s):  
M Botteman ◽  
J Carter ◽  
S Kaura
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Skeletal Related Events ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals PCN73 Cost Effectiveness of Zoledronic Acid vs. Pamidronate or No therapy for the Treatment of Bone Metastases Secondary to Prostate Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A447
Author(s):  
J.A. Carter ◽  
M. Bains ◽  
D. Chandiwana ◽  
S. Kaura ◽  
M.F. Botteman
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Metastases

scholarly journals Management of skeletal-related events in patients with advanced prostate cancer and bone metastases: Incorporating new agents into clinical practice

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan So ◽  
Joseph Chin ◽  
Neil Fleshner ◽  
Fred Saad
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Therapy Monitoring ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Skeletal Related Events

Skeletal-related events (SREs) are a common complication of bone metastases, and have serious negative consequences for patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). SREs can lead to severe pain, increased risk of death, increased health care costs and reduced quality of life. Until recently, zoledronic acid has been the sole standard of care for the prevention of SREs in men with CRPC with bone metastases. Denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANK-L) inhibitor, has been recently approved for use in Canada for this indication, thus presenting another option for these patients. Denosumab was shown to be superior to zoledronic acid in delaying the time to first or subsequent SREs in CRPC patients with bone metastases. This review discusses current and previous trials examining agents designed to prevent SREs in men with CRPC and bone metastases. It also discusses the practical aspects of administering a bone-targeted therapy, including choosing a bone-targeted therapy, monitoring at the onset and during therapy, switching from one therapy to another, and assessing potential complications.

Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: Comparison between France, Germany, and the United Kingdom

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5106-5106
Author(s):  
M. F. Botteman ◽  
S. Kaura
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Skeletal Related Events ◽  
The Uk

5106 Background: Zoledronic acid (ZOL) significantly reduces the risk of new skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients (pts) with bone metastases from RCC. This study assessed and compared the cost-effectiveness of ZOL in pts with RCC from French, German, and United Kingdom (UK) societal perspectives. Methods: This analysis was based on a retrospective analysis of RCC pts with bone metastases who were enrolled in a 9-mo trial of ZOL or placebo (PBO) plus concomitant antineoplastic therapy. A model was developed to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) experienced by study pts. The model included data and assumptions regarding SRE incidence, mortality, drug and administration costs, SRE costs, reduced quality of life (QOL) because of SREs and bone pain, and therapy duration. SRE costs were estimated using diagnosis-related group tariff information and published literature. Consistent with similar economic analyses, it was assumed that QOL decreased 20% to 80% (depending on SRE type) for 1 mo after each SRE experienced. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the effects of alternate assumptions, with < 30,000/QALY considered cost-effective. Results: Compared with PBO-treated pts (n = 19), ZOL-treated pts (n = 27) experienced 1.07 fewer SREs/pt and gained discounted QALYs of approximately 0.1563 in France and Germany and 0.1575 in the UK. Discounted SRE-related costs were substantially lower among pts treated with ZOL vs PBO (-4,196 in France, -3,880 in Germany, and -3,355 in the UK). After including drug therapy costs, ZOL saved 1,358, 1,223, and 719 per pt in France, Germany, and the UK, respectively. In multivariate sensitivity analyses, ZOL saved costs in 67% to 77% of cases, depending on the country. ZOL resulted in a cost per QALY gained < 30,000 in approximately 93% of cases. Conclusions: Treatment with ZOL reduces SREs, improves QOL, and lowers health-related costs compared with PBO in French, German, and UK pts with bone metastases from RCC. Use of ZOL in these populations therefore provides health-related cost savings and is a cost-effective use of healthcare resources. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Denosumab in the Prevention of Skeletal-related Events in Patients with Prostate Cancer in Kazakhstan

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Bektur ◽  
Talgat Nurgozhin
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Direct Costs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Tree Age ◽  
Bone Mass Loss ◽  
Skeletal Related Events ◽  
The Cost

Introduction. Bone mass loss (BML) is one of the adverse effects of oncological chemotherapy, especially in cases of hormonal types of cancer, such as a prostate cancer (PC). BML is strongly associated with skeletal-related events (SREs), therefore decreasing the quality of patient’s life. Denosumab shows an advantage over zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying the first onset of SREs and subsequent SREs in adults with PC in several phase III clinical trials. Since generic ZA recently became available, the purpose of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs. brand or generic ZA in the prevention of SREs in Kazakhstani patients with PC.Methods. A Markov model was constructed in Tree-Age Pro 2013 software program with 4-week model cycles to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the treatments from the perspective of Ministry of Health (MoH) over a 10-year PC cohort. Direct costs (in Kazakhstani monetary units “tenge” in 2014) included costs of drug, SRE (pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, radiation to bone, spinal cord compression), and adverse events treatment. All costs were discounted for 3% per year. Effectiveness was appraised based on the number of SREs. Health states were defined according to SRE occurrence, SRE history, and death. The model assumed that a maximum of 1 SRE could occur in each cycle. Transition probabilities were derived from the relevant phase III trials. Results were present in the incremental total cost per SRE avoided. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the model.Results. Over the 10-year period, denosumab incurred 103,091 tenge higher costs than brand ZA, 677,133 tenge higher costs than generic ZA, and 0.58 fewer SREs per patient with PC. The estimated incremental total direct costs per SRE avoided with the use of denosumab were 177,743 tenge (instead of brand ZA) and 1,167,470 tenge (instead of generic ZA). Results were robust to one-way sensitivity analyses.Conclusions.With the assumption that brand and generic ZAs are equally effective in the prevention of SREs in PC patients, denosumab seems to be a cost-effective alternative for brand ZA (insignificant difference in costs – less than 5%) and a costly alternative for generic ZA from the perspective of MoH of Kazakhstan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document