In this study, we attempted to analyze the predominant issues that have emerged from the fire door litigation process that has been conducted until recently, and to suggest alternatives. The results of analyzing the contents and outcomes of fire door litigation were confirmed by the issue of the durability period of the fire doors’ fire protection performance. Further, they were supported by the confirmation of the fire protection performance of fire doors that have already been installed, and the extent of the defect repair when the fire door performance is not confirmed. To solve these issues, performance verification must be executed at the manufacturing, delivery, and construction stages of fire doors. In the use stage, after completion, the user (Resident) should be the subject of performance maintenance. To this end, it is necessary to introduce the duty of maintenance and management of fire doors at the stage of use and the introduction of a professional inspection system that carries out inspections. Additionally, since the soundness of the fire door frame was confirmed through simulation and test results, the fire protection performance of the fire door in use can be confirmed by only separating the door. This can be achieved by excluding the door frame and conducting a test. It is considered that performance can be sufficiently secured despite the performance of the fire door being confirmed to be inferior, even if performance is improved by limiting the repair range to fire door pairs.
Study on the Influence of Scheme of Damage Detection to Door Frame
