PP124-MON NUTRITIONAL RISK SCREENING (NRS 2002) IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN A GASTROENTEROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT: IMPLEMENTATION OF A LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMATIC STRATEGY

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
M. Arvanitakis ◽  
A. Bailarín ◽  
S. Vereecken ◽  
A. Van Gossum
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Systematic Strategy ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

scholarly journals Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) as a tool to predict clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients: a literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thiago Rocha de Pinho ◽  
Simone Mayane Mendes dos Santos ◽  
Renara Leite Rodrigues Rocha
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Nutritional Support ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Nutritional Screening ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

The presence of malnutrition in hospitalized patients is prevalent and studies show its association with a higher incidence of complications, mortality, length of stay, costs, and increased frequency of hospital readmission. Routine use of simple tracking procedures is recommended. Nutritional screening detects individuals who are malnourished or at risk of developing malnutrition, and who can receive specific nutritional support. Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) is a nutritional screening method recommended by the European Society for Clinical and Metabolism (ESPEN) and identifies the risk of developing malnutrition in hospitalized patients. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the NRS screening method (2002) and its relationship with clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients.

PP332 NUTRITIONAL RISK SCREENING (NRS 2002) IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS: FOCUS ON FOOD INTAKE DECREASE

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
M. Arvanitakis ◽  
A. Lintermans ◽  
M. Raedemaeker ◽  
A. Coudray ◽  
S. Vereecken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Intake ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Clinical and Seasonal Variations of Nutritional Risk Screening in Patients Scheduled for Rehabilitation after Heart Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
Marko Boban ◽  
Viktor Persic ◽  
Zeljko Jovanovic ◽  
Niksa Drinkovic ◽  
Milan Milosevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Climate Effects ◽  
Seasonal Climate ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

<p><b>Background:</b> Current knowledge on the pervasiveness of increased nutritional risk in cardiovascular diseases is limited. Our aim was to analyze the characteristics of nutritional risk screening in patients scheduled for rehabilitation after heart surgery. Prevalence and extent of nutritional risk were studied in connection with patients' characteristics and seasonal climate effects on weight loss dynamics.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The cohort included 65 consecutive patients with an age range of 25-84 years, 2-6 months after surgical treatment for ischemic or valvular heart disease. Nutritional risk screening was appraised using a standardized NRS-2002 questionnaire. Groups were analyzed according to a timeline of rehabilitation according to the "cold" and "warm" seasons of the moderate Mediterranean climate in Opatija, Croatia.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Increased nutritional risk scores (NRS-2002) of >3 were found in 96% of studied patients. Mean NRS-2002 of patients was 5.0 � 1.0, with a percentage weight loss history of 11.7% � 2.2% (4.6-19.0). Risk was found to be more pronounced during the warmer season, with NRS-2002 scores of 5.3 � 0.7 versus 4.8 � 1.1 (<i>P</i> = 0.136) and greater loss of weight of 13.0% � 3.2% versus 10.6% � 3% (<i>P</i> = 0.005), respectively. Increased nutritional risk correlated significantly with creatinine concentrations (rho = 0.359; <i>P</i> = 0.034 versus 0.584; <i>P</i> = 0.001, respectively). Significant discordance in correlations was found between NRS-2002 and the decrease in left ventricle systolic function (rho correlation coefficient [rho-cc] = -0.428; <i>P</i> = 0.009), the increase in glucose concentrations (cc = 0.600; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the decrease in erythrocyte counts (cc = -0.520; <i>P</i> = 0.001) during the colder season.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Increased nutritional risk was found to be frequently expressed in the course of rehabilitation after heart surgery. Although seasonal climate effects influenced the weight loss dynamics, the impact on reproducibility of NRS-2002 was clinically less important. Further studies on the connection of nutritional risk with composited end points might offer improvements in overall quality of treatment.</p>

scholarly journals A study of nutritional status, development of malnutrition and food consumption in hospitalized patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-80
Author(s):  
Anil Evrim Gungor ◽  
Perihan Arslan ◽  
Osman Abbasoglu
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Food Services ◽  
Hospital Malnutrition ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Mid Upper Arm Circumference ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Purpose: To investigate the nutritional status of patients on admission and during hospital stay, the factors leading to weight loss, and to evaluate patient satisfaction of hospital food. Methods: On admission, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI), mid upper arm circumference (MAC) measurements were carried out; serum total protein and albumin levels were recorded. Upon discharge, measurements of weight, MAC were repeated, along with a food satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Patients with NRS-2002>3, BMI<20, were classified as nutrionally at risk which were 43.6% and 9.4% respectively. Of the patients, 77% lost weight (2.6±1.9 kg). Patients who were determined to be malnourished on admission by BMI and NRS-2002 stayed longer in hospital (p<0.0 and p<0.001, respectively). The relationships between weight loss and lenght of stay, use of medications and period of starvation were significant (p<0.0001, for each). Of the patients, 49.9% did not satisfy with the hospital food. Conclusions: Nutritional status of hospitalized patients should be screened with NRS-2002, assessed and monitored. Keywords: NRS-2002, hospital malnutrition, hospital food services

scholarly journals Comparação dos critérios da nrs-2002 com o risco nutricional em pacientes hospitalizados

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 3325-3334
Author(s):  
Adriana Aparecida de Oliveira Barbosa ◽  
Andréa Pereira Vicentini ◽  
Fernanda Ramos Langa
Keyword(s):  
Nutritional Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Nrs 2002 ◽  
Para Determinar ◽  
Nutritional Risk Screening

Resumo A triagem “Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002)” é uma ferramenta considerada padrão ouro na análise do risco nutricional. Sendo assim, objetivou-se identificar na “NRS-2002” qual ou quais os critérios avaliados que mais contribuem para determinar o risco nutricional. Estudo descritivo transversal e quantitativo com 763 adultos e idosos hospitalizados, no ano de 2015. Aplicada a “NRS-2002” que avalia as variáveis Índice de Massa Corporal (IMC), perda de peso nos últimos 3 meses, redução da ingestão alimentar na última semana e gravidade da doença. A estatística dos dados foi descritiva e analítica por meio do método de regressão logística univariada. Observou-se que 46,4% dos pacientes apresentaram risco nutricional, com maiores chances em homens e idosos. Sendo a perda de peso o critério mais prevalente seguido da redução da ingestão alimentar, o IMC < 20,5kg/m² teve maior efeito no risco nutricional (OR = 31,0; IC 95%:14,21;67,44). Concluiu-se que o IMC < 20,5kg/m² e a perda de peso nos últimos três meses foram os fatores que mais contribuíram na determinação do risco nutricional, sendo a identificação precoce do risco nutricional de extrema importância para o direcionamento da conduta dietoterápica para a melhora da ingestão alimentar com objetivo de recuperação do peso corporal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document