Methane Extraction on Lake Kivu: Green Extractive Humanitarianism

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Kristin Doughty ◽  
Dieudonné Uwizeye ◽  
Elyseé Uwimana

Abstract In 2016, Rwanda began extracting methane gas from Lake Kivu, an innovative project designed to reduce the risk of a deadly spontaneous gas release while providing clean and renewable power to an energy-strapped region. Based on qualitative research in Rwanda from 2016 to 2019, Doughty, Uwizeye, and Uwimana use the Kivu methane extraction project to ask, How do we balance urgent electrification needs with responsible energy policies that respond to environmental risks, particularly in post-conflict contexts? Analyzing the Kivu methane projects as “green extractive humanitarianism” provides cautions within the promises of sustainability and “green capitalism.”

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-37
Author(s):  
Kristin Doughty

This article, based on ethnographic fieldwork in 2016–2019, examines methane extraction operations in Lake Kivu on the Rwanda/DRC border as a lens into understanding how energy futures in Africa are imagined and enacted within national projects of post-war reconstruction. In 2005, scientists suggested that the lake’s dissolved methane risked oversaturation within the century. This spurred state-backed projects to simultaneously prevent a natural disaster and harness the methane to meet Rwanda’s rising electrification needs. Two companies are currently building and operating methane-fuelled power plants. The article suggests that these energy projects, an integral part of the overall architecture of social repair in Rwanda, reproduce and generate forms of captivity and entrapment that are central to understanding the lived politics of ‘carceral repair’, a generation after genocide.


Author(s):  
Natacha Pasche ◽  
Janvière Tuyisenge ◽  
Ange Mugisha ◽  
Edouard Rugema ◽  
Alice Muzana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 160940691986484 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Mwambari

This article examines the positionality of local stakeholders in the production of knowledge through fieldwork in qualitative research in Northern Uganda. While scholarly literature has evolved on the positionality and experiences of researchers from the Global North in (post)conflict environments, little is known about the positionality and experiences of local stakeholders in the production of knowledge. This article is based on interviews and focus groups with research assistants and respondents in Northern Uganda. Using a phenomenological approach, this article analyzes the positionality and experiences of these research associates and respondents during fieldwork. Three themes emerged from these interviews and are explored in this article: power, fatigue, and safety. This article emphasizes that researchers need to be reflexive in their practices and highlights the need to reexamine how researchers are trained in qualitative methods before going into the field. This article is further critical of the behavior of researchers and how research agendas impact local stakeholders during and after fieldwork.


2020 ◽  
pp. 146879412090488
Author(s):  
Philipp Schulz

This article re-conceptualizes the highly ambivalent relationships between researchers and research participants in conflict zones, with a focus on recognizing respondents’ multiple and fluid positionalities. Standardized and dominant approaches to qualitative research are largely based on essentialist and infantilized portrayals of research participants and neo-colonial assumptions regarding the research relationship: informants are presumed to be inevitably vulnerable and in need of external protection, while the researcher is positioned as the omnipresent expert in control of the research process. In reality, however, research participants rarely exclusively occupy the ‘oppressed victimhood’ axis of identity and frequently take on active roles in the research and data collection process in a myriad of ways. I elucidate how especially in (post-)conflict zones, research participants frequently re-shape power dynamics by exercising agency over the researcher and the research process. While previous studies have considered how informants’ agency can shape processes of knowledge production, in this article I expand this focus by examining how key-informants can, and frequently do, facilitate the researchers’ safety and security. I specifically draw on personal experiences of empirical research in Northern Uganda. I demonstrate how in a particular moment of post-conflict insecurity – while being trapped in-between the exchange of gunfire between the Ugandan police and an armed group – one of my key-informants ensured my physical protection and safety, thereby exercising power over me and the research relationship. The key-informants in this context thus occupied multiple positionalities – ranging from informant to protector, evidencing that research relationships are never static but rather contextual, shift and fluctuate. Such ambivalent and fluid power dynamics are more reflective of the lived realities of qualitative research and can influence the research process by positioning researchers and research participants on more equal terms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Yuliana Febriani Tasidjawa ◽  
Jacob Daan Engel

<p><span>This article discusses the role of Kai-Wait as a philosophy of life in the post-conflict reconciliation process towards Islam-Christian relations from the perspective of interfaith and cultural assistance and counseling on Buru Island, Maluku. The method used is a qualitative research method. Data collection techniques used were observing research sites, namely some areas on Buru Island which became a place of debate, interviews with traditional leaders, religious leaders, and the community, as well as conducting literature studies through literature relevant to the research in this paper. Analysis of the data used is the Miles and Huberman Interactive Model. In this study, the authors found that Kai -unggu as the local wisdom of the Buru community was a means of reconciling conflict. In addition to conflict reconciliation, values </span><span>in the Kai-Wait culture are also an aid in interfaith and cultural assistance and counseling on the island of Buru. The pattern of counseling is done with the help of Centered Client Therapy with common cases such as family problems, social crisis, and trauma. The values </span><span>that the writer found in interfaith counseling and counseling and the value of brotherhood / family and the value of appreciation.</span></p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 146879412110129
Author(s):  
Carla Pascoe Leahy

When conducting interviews about sensitive subject matter such as family life, powerful emotions may arise. The kinds of unexpected distress that can surface in interviews concerning topics laden with personal significance are different to the readily anticipated trauma that accompanies interviews in post-crisis or post-conflict situation. This article analyses the ethical considerations that accompany such research, drawing upon literature from oral history and qualitative sociology. The article traces ethical issues during the temporal phases of qualitative research – before, during and after an interview – before proposing three strategies that interviewers can adopt to help protect narrators from ongoing harm or distress after an interview. Such ethical safeguards include the self-interview, the post-interview follow-up with the narrator, and adopting an ethics of reciprocity that allows the narrator to feel that they are contributing to a larger purpose through involvement in research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document