scholarly journals Population growth rate as a basis for ecological risk assessment of toxic chemicals

2003 ◽  
pp. 269-283
Author(s):  
Valery E. Forbes ◽  
Peter Calow
2002 ◽  
Vol 357 (1425) ◽  
pp. 1299-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valery E. Forbes ◽  
Peter Calow

Assessing the ecological risks of toxic chemicals is most often based on individual–level responses such as survival, reproduction or growth. Such an approach raises the following questions with regard to translating these measured effects into likely impacts on natural populations. (i) To what extent do individual–level variables underestimate or overestimate population–level responses? (ii) How do toxicant–caused changes in individual–level variables translate into changes in population dynamics for species with different life cycles? (iii) To what extent are these relationships complicated by population–density effects? These issues go to the heart of the ecological relevance of ecotoxicology and we have addressed them using the population growth rate as an integrating concept. Our analysis indicates that although the most sensitive individual–level variables are likely to be equally or more sensitive to increasing concentrations of toxic chemicals than population growth rate, they are difficult to identify a priori and, even if they could be identified, integrating impacts on key life–cycle variables via population growth rate analysis is nevertheless a more robust approach for assessing the ecological risks of chemicals. Populations living under density–dependent control may respond differently to toxic chemicals than exponentially growing populations, and greater care needs to be given to incorporating realistic density conditions (either experimentally or by simulation) into ecotoxicological test designs. It is impractical to expect full life–table studies, which record changes in survival, fecundity and development at defined intervals through the life cycle of organisms under specified conditions, for all relevant species, so we argue that population growth rate analysis should be used to provide guidance for a more pragmatic and ecologically sound approach to ecological risk assessment.


Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2161
Author(s):  
Kwang-Ming Liu ◽  
Lung-Hsin Huang ◽  
Kuan-Yu Su ◽  
Shoou-Jeng Joung

The vulnerability of 11 pelagic shark species caught by the Taiwanese coastal and offshore longline fisheries in the western North Pacific were assessed by an ecological risk assessment (ERA) and 10 of the 11 species was assessed by using an integrated ERA developed in this study. The intrinsic rate of population growth was used to estimate the productivity of sharks, and the susceptibility of sharks was estimated by the multiplication of the catchability, selectivity, and post-capture mortality. Three indices namely, the IUCN Red List category, the body weight variation trend, and the inflection point of population growth curve coupled with ERA were used to conduct an integrated ERA. The results indicated that the scalloped hammerhead is at the highest risk (group 1), followed by the silky shark, and the spinner shark at high risk (group 2). The bigeye thresher, and sandbar shark fall in group 3, the smooth hammerhead falls in group 4, and the shortfin mako, pelagic thresher, oceanic whitetip, and dusky shark fall in group 5. Rigorous management measures for the species in groups 1 and 2, setting total allowable catch quota for group 3, and consistent monitoring schemes for groups 4 and 5 are recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document