scholarly journals Reducing preventable patient transfers from long-term care facilities to emergency departments: a scoping review – CORRIGENDUM

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran L. Grant ◽  
Daniel Dongjoo Lee ◽  
Ivy Cheng ◽  
G. Ross Baker
CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S96-S97
Author(s):  
K. Grant ◽  
D. Lee ◽  
I. Cheng ◽  
G. Baker

Introduction: Emergency Department (ED) crowding is an international health system issue that is worsening. Further, ED crowding and “hallway medicine” has been identified as one of the most significant healthcare challenges currently facing Canadians. One contributor is preventable transfers from long-term care facilities (LTCFs) to Emergency Departments (EDs). In Canada, there were 63,752 LTCF patient transfers to the ED in 2014, with 24% (15,202) of them due to potentially preventable conditions. Each preventable transfer exposes patients to transport and hospital-related complications, and costs the healthcare system thousands of dollars. There have been many proposed and studied interventions aimed at alleviating the issue, but few attempts to assess and evaluate different interventions across institutions in a systematic manner. Methods: A scoping review of the literature using three electronic databases was conducted. A scoping review methodology was used due to the range of interventions and the heterogeneity in study design and outcome. Inclusion criteria included: studies on interventions designed to reduce transfers from LTCFs, studies that reported key outcomes such as number of ED transfers, and studies with a control or comparison group. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers (Cohen's k = 0.68), and study quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute quality assessment tools. Results: Findings were organized into five intervention types (telemedicine, outreach teams, interdisciplinary teams, integrated approaches, and other), and both a tabular and narrative synthesis was completed. Eleven studies had a good quality assessment rating, 13 studies had a fair rating, and two studies had a poor rating. Twenty out of the 26 studies reported statistically significant reductions in ED transfer rate, ranging from 10-70%. Interdisciplinary healthcare teams staffed within LTCFs were the most effective interventions. Conclusion: There are several promising interventions that have successfully reduced the number of preventable transfers from LTCFs to EDs, in a variety of health system settings. Further analysis of the relative resource requirements of each intervention, and practices that can enable successful implementation are needed to inform healthcare policy and administrative decision making. Widespread implementation of these interventions has the potential to considerably reduce ED crowding.


CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 844-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran L. Grant ◽  
Daniel Dongjoo Lee ◽  
Ivy Cheng ◽  
G. Ross Baker

ABSTRACTBackgroundIn Canada, there were over 60,000 long-term care facility patient transfers to emergency departments (EDs) in 2014, with up to a quarter of them being potentially preventable. Each preventable transfer exposes the patient to transport- and hospital-related complications, contributes to ED crowding, and adds significant costs to the health care system. There have been many proposed and studied interventions aimed at alleviating the issue, but few attempts to assess and evaluate different interventions across institutions.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE for studies describing the impact of interventions aimed at reducing preventable transfers from long-term care facilities to EDs on ED transfer rate. Two independent reviewers screened the studies for inclusion and completed a quality assessment. A tabular and narrative synthesis was then completed. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.ResultsA total of 26 studies were included (Cohen's k = 0.68). One was of low quality (Cohen's k = 0.58). Studies were summarized into five themes based on intervention type: Telemedicine, Outreach Teams, Interdisciplinary Care, Integrated Approaches, and Other. Effective interventions reported reductions in ED transfer rates post intervention ranging from 10 to 70%. Interdisciplinary health care teams staffed within long-term care facilities were the most effective interventions.ConclusionThere are several promising interventions that have successfully reduced the number of preventable transfers from long-term care facilities to EDs in a variety of health care settings. Widespread implementation of these interventions has the potential to reduce ED crowding in Canada.


Author(s):  
Patrick Alexander Wachholz ◽  
Deborah Cristina De Oliveira ◽  
Kathryn Hinsliff-Smith ◽  
Reena Devi ◽  
Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas ◽  
...  

This scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics, strengths, and gaps in research conducted in Brazilian long-term care facilities (LTCFs) for older adults. Electronic searches investigating the residents (≥60 years old), their families, and the LTCF workforce in Brazil were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, and Google Scholar, within the timescale of 1999 to 2018, limited to English, Portuguese, or Spanish. The reference lists were hand searched for additional papers. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for critical appraisal of evidence. Data were reported descriptively considering the study design, using content analysis: 327 studies were included (n = 159 quantitative non-randomized, n = 82 quantitative descriptive, n = 67 qualitative, n = 11 mixed methods, n = 6 randomized controlled trials, and n = 2 translation of assessment tools). Regardless of the study design, most were conducted in a single LTCF (45.8%), in urban locations (84.3%), and in non-profit settings (38.7%). The randomized trials and descriptive studies presented the lowest methodological quality based on the MMAT. This is the first review to provide an overview of research on LTCFs for older people in Brazil. It illustrates an excess of small-scale, predominantly qualitative papers, many of which are reported in ways that do not allow the quality of the work to be assured.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Freeman ◽  
Kristen Bishop ◽  
Lina Spirgiene ◽  
Erica Koopmans ◽  
Fernanda C. Botelho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dukyoo Jung ◽  
Kyuri Lee ◽  
Jennie C. De Gagne ◽  
Minkyung Lee ◽  
Hyesoon Lee ◽  
...  

This paper reports a scoping review of the literature on eating difficulties among older adults with dementia in long-term care facilities to identify key concepts, methods of measuring outcomes, interventions, and related factors. A scoping review was performed using the bibliographic databases PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. A combination of keywords and subject headings related to eating or feeding difficulties was used. Inclusion criteria were limited to materials published in English. A total of 1070 references were retrieved, of which 39 articles were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles that met the criteria were published between 1987 and 2020. “Eating disabilities” have been defined as problems related to choosing food and/or the ability to get food to one’s mouth, chew, and swallow. Interventions for eating difficulties described in the literature include spaced retrieval training, Montessori training, and feeding skill training. Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental factors related to eating difficulties were identified. This scoping review will provide direct care workers, nursing educators, and administrators with an overview of eating performance and a broad understanding of eating difficulties for older adults with dementia in long-term care facilities.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Freeman ◽  
Kristen Bishop ◽  
Lina Spirgiene ◽  
Erica Koopmans ◽  
Fernanda C. Botelho ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 1428-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew E.C. Fuller ◽  
Lisa M. Guirguis ◽  
Cheryl A. Sadowski ◽  
Mark J. Makowsky

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 652-652
Author(s):  
Eunju Choi ◽  
Dukyoo Jung ◽  
Kyuri Lee

Abstract This study aims to synthesize existing literature concerning eating difficulties among older adults with dementia in long-term care facilities. A scoping review, using the framework proposed by Arksey & O'Malley (2005) and improved and supplemented by Levac et al. (2010), was conducted. Literature was searched from five bibliographic databases—Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), Korean studies Information Service System (KISS), National Digital Science Library (NDSJ), Korean Medical Database (KMBASE), DataBase Periodical Information Academic(DBPia), Google Scholar, and gray literature. Literature selection and characteristics were approved by two independent reviewers, using pre-tested forms to determine final inclusion. Eventually, 111 articles from 2012–2020 were identified, and the 11 articles were used for the final analysis. We found that primarily utilized Eating behavior scale (EBS) and Edinburgh feeding evaluation in dementia scale (EdFED) had utilized as measurement tools for evaluating eating behavior. The most common factors related to eating behavior of older adults with dementia included cognitive and physical functions in the individual domain, the caregiver's attitude toward eating in the inter-individual domain, and types of meal in the environmental domain. Therefore, it is essential to develop measurement tools that reflect the eating behavior of older adults with dementia, a comprehensive understanding of the eating behavior of old adults with dementia, and create effective interventions that can be implemented in the specificity of long-term care facilities in Korea. The results of this analysis are intended to be used as basis to develop a meal support programs for older adults with dementia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document