scholarly journals 2474 Promoting collaboration among researchers: A team science training curriculum

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Knapke ◽  
Amy Short ◽  
Tamilyn Bakas ◽  
Jacinda Dariotis ◽  
Elizabeth Heubi ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: As multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research has become imperative to solving the complex problems of contemporary healthcare, teaching researchers how to create and maintain high-functioning and innovative teams has also become paramount. In Fall 2016, the Center for Improvement Science (CIS) core, in collaboration with the Translational Workforce Development (TWD) core, at the Cincinnati Center for Clinical & Translational Science & Training (CCTST) began offering training in Team Science in an effort to better prepare researchers for collaborative work. Since then, the CIS has expanded Team Science education into a multifaceted and adaptable curriculum that includes workshops, team consultations, Grand Rounds, grant writing assistance, grant review, train-the-trainer, and a graduate-level course. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Over almost 2 years, we have offered 9 unique workshops attended by individuals from the University of Cincinnati, UCHealth, and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Recruitment was primarily accomplished via email invitations. Topics ranged from introductory team science issues such as Creating Teams, Team Effectiveness, and Team Leadership to more advanced team science areas such as Team Dysfunctions and Conflict Management. In addition, we have consulted with researchers on Team Science components of grant applications and served as grant reviewers for Team Science elements in a competitive, internal research funding program. We have developed tools and teaching strategies for faculty members tasked with teaching students about collaboration (train-the-trainer). And finally, we offered a graduate level course on Collaboration and Team Science. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Over 250 participants attended our workshops and Grand Rounds, many at the faculty level, but we also had research staff and graduate students register. Content was very well-received, with workshop evaluations typically scoring in the high 4.5 and above range (on a 5-point scale, with 5 being the highest rating). The CIS team received (and accepted) at least 2 follow-up invitations from workshop participants to provide training to an additional team or group. We are tracking data on long-term effects of team science training and consultation, both in research productivity and team satisfaction/longevity. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The goals of Team Science training at the Cincinnati CCTST are 2-fold: to provide practical knowledge, skills, and tools to enhance transdisciplinary collaboration and to promote systemic changes at UC, CCHMC, and UCHealth that support team science. After almost 2 years of training, team science is gaining traction among key leaders at our local institutions and a broader audience of researchers who see how collaborative practice can enhance their professions.

1967 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 1087-1093
Author(s):  
EDWARD F. McCRAW ◽  
H C ALEXANDER ◽  
J H BLANTON

1964 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-188
Author(s):  
C. I. WILLIAMSON ◽  
O. A. BAKER ◽  
W. P. BEETHAM

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-211
Author(s):  
Sarah H. W. Sell ◽  
Robert E. Merrill ◽  
Emanuel O. Doyne ◽  
Edmond P. Zimsky

The long-term effects of H. influenzae meningitis were studied in 86 patients who were treated with acceptable antibiotic therapy during acute episode in 1950 to 1964 in Nashville, Tennessee. Follow-up revealed that 11 were dead (eight died within first 24 hours of hospitalization). Fifty-six of them returned to Vanderbilt Medical Center for the following appraisals: history, general physical and neurological examinations; pure tone audiometry evaluation; and psychological testing by Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Nineteen others sent information by questionnaire. Results indicated that 26 (29%) survivors had severe or significant handicaps; 12 (14%) had possible residuals; and 37 (43%) were free of detectable deficits. It was concluded that prevention of this disease should now be a prime goal.


Author(s):  
Afshin A. Taleghani ◽  
Arpita Bhriguvanshi ◽  
Beena D. Kamath-Rayne ◽  
Chunyan Liu ◽  
Vivek Narendran

Objective The timing of antenatal steroids (ANS) on short- and long-term effects on newborn infants was evaluated. Study Design This study was conducted at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center Level-III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by reviewing the medical records of all women with history of ANS exposure from January 2015 to December 2018. We compared outcomes of newborns delivered within the ideal therapeutic window of 24 hours to 7 days (within window [WW]) after administration to those exposed and delivered outside the therapeutic window (outside window primary group [OWP]). Outcomes included anthropometrics, blood sugars, thyroid hormone profile, and neonatal morbidities. Results A total of 669 patients were identified as having received at least two doses of ANS. Two-thirds of them delivered within the ideal therapeutic window. Significant differences were found in anthroprometrics including lower birth weight, shorter length, and smaller head circumferences in those born within the window compared with those outside the window. Derangements in glucose homeostasis requiring treatment and elevations of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were seen in infants born outside the ideal therapeutic window compared with those born within the therapeutic window. No differences were found in neonatal morbidities including severe intraventricular hemorrhage (sIVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), need for resuscitation, exogenous surfactant administration, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). After controlling for selected covariates, only birth length was different between the groups. Conclusion Effects on anthropometrics, glucose homeostasis, and thyroid function support the need to develop new or refine existing risk stratification systems to time the administration of antenatal steroids. Better targeting of women and fetuses may confer the benefits of systemic corticosteroids while mitigating the risks of adverse effects. Key Points


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon D. Simmons ◽  
Joseph W. Gunter ◽  
Justin D. Manley ◽  
David E. Sawaya ◽  
Christopher J. Blewett

The safety and effectiveness of a stapled intestinal anastomosis in adults and children is well documented. However, the role of this technique in neonates is not well validated. We report our experience with stapled intestinal anastomoses in the neonate at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. All patients from the neonatal intensive care unit who had a stapled intestinal anastomosis between February 2007 and May 2008 were identified. A stapled side-to-side functional end-to-end intestinal anastomosis was performed in all patients using a gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler. Demographic, management, and outcome data were collected via chart review. Variables collected included: birth weight, estimated gestational age at birth and surgery, weight at surgery, the use of vasopressors, associated diagnoses, location of the anastomosis, and postoperative clinic visits. A total of 18 patients were identified during the study period. Nine had small bowel to small bowel, eight had ileum to colon, and one had a colon to colon anastomosis. The average weight at time of operation was 2.8 kilograms (Kg) and the average estimated gestational age at surgery was 38.7 weeks. The only complication reported was a partial small bowel obstruction on postoperative day 12, which was successfully treated nonoperatively. Two patients died from problems not associated with the anastomosis. There were no anastomotic leaks or strictures. The literature regarding the use of stapled bowel anastomoses in neonates is scant. Stapled intestinal anastomoses can be performed safely in neonates without a high rate of complication. The long term effects of stapled intestinal anastomoses in the neonate are unknown. Future areas of interest would include effects on postoperative feeding and operative time.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 47-47
Author(s):  
Gayathri Devi ◽  
Ranjan Sudan ◽  
Stephanie Freel ◽  
Laura Fish

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: To improve translational research, we have developed a program called Duke Multidisciplinary Education and Research in Translational Sciences (Duke MERITS). Duke MERITS will facilitate cross-disciplinary collaboration among faculty involved in foundational, clinical and/or health care research and in turn also prepare them to train the next generation of translational researchers. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The program aims are (1) to define metrics and outcomes measures so faculty can track their progress and identify impact of their collaborative research in translational sciences; (2) to offer a multi-modal faculty development series to promote team science, improve didactic teaching, and incorporate innovative resources to promote interdisciplinary approach to translational research; (3) to provide module-based hands-on-training sessions in bench to bedside research and training in translational grant writing to facilitate the development of multidisciplinary research collaborations. The present study describes results from Aim 1 and includes (a) development of baseline outcome assessment tools necessary to gauge the impact of our programs on both the participating faculty and the research culture within Duke University, (b) impact of a specific course offering in Translational Medicine. In order to achieve this, we conducted multiple focus group sessions with faculty self-identified as junior-, mid-, or advanced-career, a mixed group at any career level and included a group of graduate students and postdoctoral trainees to study the impact of a graduate level course in Translational Aspects of Pathobiology. The activities during these translational science focus groups were designed to define what successful translational science is, to determine what resources support translational Science at Duke, and to decide what resources we need in order to enhance Duke’s position as a leader in research and scientific education. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified that translational science is changing standards while incorporating leadership, teamwork, collaborations, and movement primarily focusing on the overall goal of improving all aspects of health. Participants categorized their field of study and the fields of their coparticipants most frequently as basic discovery and a combination of intervention and health services. The most frequently identified pros/benefits of performing translational science at Duke include industry connections, collaborations with other departments resulting in disciplines being bridged, improving patient care, and access to resources as well as money. The most frequently identified cons/barriers of performing translational science includes the expensiveness, silos, and lack of resources willing to absorb risks. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The identification of these defined factors from the focus groups has allowed us to issue a comprehensive, sliding Likert scale-based anonymous survey from the secure RedCap system and is being rolled out throughout Duke University, including schools of medicine, nursing, Trinity, biomedical engineering. We envision that Duke MERITS education program will facilitate interprofessional efforts, which we define as a team science approach to identify the clinical “roadblock” and then seek an innovative approach or technology to help overcome this “roadblock”? It can facilitate institutional and departmental recognition in faculty career development. The common goal is to gain fundamental new insights that will result in significant improvement of the existing “standard of care” and meet the challenges of dwindling extramural support.


1964 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 803-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
C I WILLIAMSON ◽  
O A BAKER ◽  
W P BEETHAM

1968 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
pp. 963-970
Author(s):  
H CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER ◽  
EDWARD F. McCRAW ◽  
JAMES H. BLANTON

1963 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 1128-1133
Author(s):  
O A BAKER ◽  
C IVEY WILLIAMSON ◽  
J A PITTMAN

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document