Disaster Documentation for the Clinician

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Zoraster ◽  
Christopher M. Burkle

AbstractDocumentation of the patient encounter is a traditional component of health care practice, a requirement of various regulatory agencies and hospital oversight committees, and a necessity for reimbursement. A disaster may create unexpected challenges to documentation. If patient volume and acuity overwhelm health care providers, what is the acceptable appropriate documentation? If alterations in scope of practice and environmental or resource limitations occur, to what degree should this be documented? The conflicts arising from allocation of limited resources create unfamiliar situations in which patient competition becomes a component of the medical decision making; should that be documented, and, if so, how?In addition to these challenges, ever-present liability worries are compounded by controversies over the standards to which health care providers will be held. Little guidance is available on how or what to document. We conducted a search of the literature and found no appropriate references for disaster documentation, and no guidelines from professional organizations. We review here the challenges affecting documentation during disasters and provide a rationale for specific patient care documentation that avoids regulatory and legal pitfalls. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2013;0:1–7)

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-147
Author(s):  
Kayla E. Boehm ◽  
Blaine C. Long ◽  
Mitchell T. Millar ◽  
Kevin C. Miller

Effectiveness of Kinesiology Tex Tape (KTT) is conflicting, with some clinicians supporting and others refuting its effects. There is limited information on the psychological effects of KTT or whether its increased use has been influenced by professional athletes. The purpose of this study was to assess the physiological, psychological, and use of KTT. A descriptive survey on the use of KTT was performed with athletic trainers and other health care providers. Many reported that KTT benefited patients physiologically and psychologically. Those who thought KTT provided a physiological benefit indicated that they use it. Many indicated KTT benefited patients psychologically, without impacting them physiologically. In addition, clinicians indicated KTT use has been influenced by professional athletes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Muneerah Lbugami ◽  
Usamah El Alem

Patient autonomy is one of the most important ethical values in the health care practice. Patients’ autonomy means the right of patients to make decisions about their medical care without their health care provider trying to influence the decision. Patients’ autonomy allows health care providers to educate the patients but do not allow them to make the decision for the patients.  


1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Moyle

This article explores why patients sue their health care providers. Following an extensive literature review, it identifies 'sue' motivators and then examines the legal basis of medical litigation by reviewing contemporary case law. Armed with the 'sue' motivators and having considered the types of claims brought against health care providers, the article focuses upon what health care providers may do to minimise litigation. It recommends specific provocative measures, which are based upon satisfying a myriad of patient needs through consenting practices, and early recognition and resolution of patient issues by providers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 531-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinita Singh ◽  
Ali J. Zarrabi ◽  
Kimberly A. Curseen ◽  
Roman Sniecinski ◽  
Justine W. Welsh ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Several states, particularly in the Southeast, have restrictive medical marijuana laws that permit qualified patients to use specific cannabis products. The majority of these states, however, do not provide avenues for accessing cannabis products such as in-state dispensaries. METHODS: We conducted a survey of patients registered for medical marijuana (low tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] oil cards) in an ambulatory palliative care practice in Georgia (one of the states with restrictive medical marijuana laws). RESULTS: We had a total of 101 responses. Among our sample of patients who use cannabis as part of a state-approved low THC oil program, 56% were male and 64% were older than age 50 years. Advanced cancer was the most common reason (76%) for granting the patients access to a low THC oil card. Although patients reported cannabis products as being extremely helpful for reducing pain, they expressed considerable concerns about the legality issues (64%) and ability to obtain THC (68%). Several respondents were using unapproved formulations of cannabis products. For 48% of the patients, their physician was the source of information regarding marijuana-related products. Furthermore, they believed that their health care providers and family members were supportive of their use of cannabis (62% and 79%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients on Georgia’s medical marijuana program are most concerned about the legality of the product and their ability to obtain marijuana-related products. Therefore, we recommend that states with medical marijuana laws should provide safe and reliable access to cannabis products for qualifying patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 601-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gabriela Sava ◽  
James G. Dolan ◽  
Jerrold H. May ◽  
Luis G. Vargas

Background. Current colorectal cancer screening guidelines by the US Preventive Services Task Force endorse multiple options for average-risk patients and recommend that screening choices should be guided by individual patient preferences. Implementing these recommendations in practice is challenging because they depend on accurate and efficient elicitation and assessment of preferences from patients who are facing a novel task. Objective. To present a methodology for analyzing the sensitivity and stability of a patient’s preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening options and to provide a starting point for a personalized discussion between the patient and the health care provider about the selection of the appropriate screening option. Methods. This research is a secondary analysis of patient preference data collected as part of a previous study. We propose new measures of preference sensitivity and stability that can be used to determine if additional information provided would result in a change to the initially most preferred colorectal cancer screening option. Results. Illustrative results of applying the methodology to the preferences of 2 patients, of different ages, are provided. The results show that different combinations of screening options are viable for each patient and that the health care provider should emphasize different information during the medical decision-making process. Conclusion. Sensitivity and stability analysis can supply health care providers with key topics to focus on when communicating with a patient and the degree of emphasis to place on each of them to accomplish specific goals. The insights provided by the analysis can be used by health care providers to approach communication with patients in a more personalized way, by taking into consideration patients’ preferences before adding their own expertise to the discussion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinat Nissim ◽  
Carmine Malfitano ◽  
Mark Coleman ◽  
Gary Rodin ◽  
Mary Elliott

The well-being of health care providers may be challenged by their work, with evidence that oncology health care providers are a high-risk group for burnout. The present qualitative pilot study evaluated a mindfulness-based group intervention, referred to as Compassion, Presence, and Resilience Training (CPR-T), for oncology interprofessional teams. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the subjective experience of oncology health care providers receiving CPR-T and their perceptions of its benefits, risks, or challenges. The CPR-T was delivered to providers from two oncology teams in a large cancer center in Canada. Ten of these providers participated in semistructured interviews 1 to 5 months after completing the CPR-T. The interview transcripts were coded using a thematic analysis strategy. Five benefits of the CPR-T were identified: learning to pause, acquiring a working definition of stress and self-care, becoming fully present, building self-compassion, and receiving organizational acknowledgment and recognition of stress. In addition, two participant-identified challenges were recognized: sharing vulnerability within interprofessional teams and committing to a sitting meditation practice. These findings demonstrate positive transformations as a result of the CPR-T, as well as important challenges, and have important implications for holistic health care practice in oncology. Further research is necessary to validate the findings of this explorative study.


2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-477
Author(s):  
Lindsay M. Arnold ◽  
Darcie L. Keller ◽  
Toyin S. Tofade

There is increasing evidence demonstrating negative consequences and poor clinical outcomes associated with untreated hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients. Data in specific patient populations, primarily critically ill patients, demonstrate improved patient outcomes with tight glycemic control. To date, no clear evidence exists to determine optimal glycemic targets in non-critically ill patients; however, experts agree that better glycemic control in hospitalized patients is warranted. Glycemic control is complicated by numerous factors in hospitalized patients including increased circulating stress hormones, changing nutritional status, and administration of medication therapies that contribute to hyperglycemia. In addition, fear of hypoglycemia among health care providers, a commonly cited barrier, contributes to the failure to adopt more intensive insulin regimens. Current practice trends have proven ineffective and major changes are needed. Some of those trends include the use of sliding scale insulin, continuation of oral agents or combination insulins upon admission, and provider reluctance to initiate insulin in patients not receiving insulin prior to admission. With proper education, safe and effective use of insulin can be used during hospitalization to improve glycemic control. The following article reviews the benefits of glycemic control, identifies barriers to achieving glycemic control, and describes strategies for health care providers and institutions to realize glycemic control in medically ill hospitalized patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Nelson

Disparities based on race that target communities of color are consistently reported in the management of many diseases. Barriers to health care equity include the health care system, the patient, the community, and health care providers. This article focuses on the health care system as well as health care providers and how racism and our implicit biases affect our medical decision making. Health care providers receive little or no training on issues of race and racism. As a result, awareness of racism and its impact on health care delivery is low. I will discuss a training module that helps improve awareness around these issues. Until racial issues are honestly addressed by members of the health care team, it is unlikely that we will see significant improvements in racial health care disparities for Americans.


Author(s):  
Jillian L. McGrath ◽  
Lydia M. Sahlani

Social media (SM) and electronic communication (EC) use in emergency practice settings has offered patients and health care providers expansive options in accessing and utilizing information that affects medical decision-making. This widespread use has created opportunities and challenges for the health care community. This chapter discusses some of the ethical and legal ramifications of utilizing electronic communication, social media, and internet forums in patient care. The chapter seeks to prime emergency physicians and other providers to better inform themselves in order to ensure compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and other privacy standards. This will facilitate better patient outcomes via collaborative diagnosis while protecting against legal risks associated with the use of SM, EC, and recording for medical purposes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl_4) ◽  
pp. S-1-S-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Zelenetz ◽  
Islah Ahmed ◽  
Edward Louis Braud ◽  
James D. Cross ◽  
Nancy Davenport-Ennis ◽  
...  

Biologics are essential to oncology care. As patents for older biologics begin to expire, the United States is developing an abbreviated regulatory process for the approval of similar biologics (biosimilars), which raises important considerations for the safe and appropriate incorporation of biosimilars into clinical practice for patients with cancer. The potential for biosimilars to reduce the cost of biologics, which are often high-cost components of oncology care, was the impetus behind the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, a part of the 2010 Affordable Care Act. In March 2011, NCCN assembled a work group consisting of thought leaders from NCCN Member Institutions and other organizations, to provide guidance regarding the challenges health care providers and other key stakeholders face in incorporating biosimilars in health care practice. The work group identified challenges surrounding biosimilars, including health care provider knowledge, substitution practices, pharmacovigilance, naming and product tracking, coverage and reimbursement, use in off-label settings, and data requirements for approval.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document