scholarly journals Virtual Reality Simulation Training for Ebola Deployment

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Ragazzoni ◽  
Pier Luigi Ingrassia ◽  
Lina Echeverri ◽  
Fabio Maccapani ◽  
Lizzy Berryman ◽  
...  

AbstractBoth virtual and hybrid simulation training offer a realistic and effective educational framework and opportunity to provide virtual exposure to operational public health skills that are essential for infection control and Ebola treatment management. This training is designed to increase staff safety and create a safe and realistic environment where trainees can gain essential basic and advanced skills. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:543–546

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e048611
Author(s):  
Dandan Zhang ◽  
Hongwu Liao ◽  
Yitong Jia ◽  
Wenren Yang ◽  
Pingping He ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo develop a virtual reality simulation training programme, and further verify the effect of the programme on improving the response capacity of emergency reserve nurses confronting public health emergencies.DesignA prospective quasiexperimental design with a control group.ParticipantsA total of 120 nurses were recruited and randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group.InterventionParticipants underwent a 3-month training. The control group received the conventional training of emergency response (eg, theoretical lectures, technical skills and psychological training), while the intervention group underwent the virtual reality simulation training in combination with skills training. The COVID-19 cases were incorporated into the intervention group training, and the psychological training was identical to both groups. At the end of the training, each group conducted emergency drills twice. Before and after the intervention, the two groups were assessed for the knowledge and technical skills regarding responses to fulminate respiratory infectious diseases, as well as the capacity of emergency care. Furthermore, their pandemic preparedness was assessed with a disaster preparedness questionnaire.ResultsAfter the intervention, the scores of the relevant knowledge, the capacity of emergency care and disaster preparedness in the intervention group significantly increased (p<0.01). The score of technical skills in the control group increased more significantly than that of the intervention group (p<0.01). No significant difference was identified in the scores of postdisaster management in two groups (p>0.05).ConclusionThe virtual reality simulation training in combination with technical skills training can improve the response capacity of emergency reserve nurses as compared with the conventional training. The findings of the study provide some evidence for the emergency training of reserve nurses in better response to public health emergencies and suggest this methodology is worthy of further research and popularisation.


Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (07) ◽  
pp. 653-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishad Khan ◽  
Joanne Plahouras ◽  
Bradley C. Johnston ◽  
Michael A. Scaffidi ◽  
Samir C. Grover ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Endoscopy programs are increasingly integrating simulation training. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether virtual reality (VR) simulation training can supplement and/or replace conventional patient-based endoscopy training for health professional trainees with limited or no prior endoscopic experience. Methods We searched medical, educational, and computer literature databases in July 2017 for trials that compared VR simulation training with no training, conventional training, another form of simulation training, or an alternative method of VR training. We screened, abstracted data, and performed quantitative analysis and quality assessment through Cochrane methodology. Results We included 18 trials with 3817 endoscopic procedures. VR training provided no advantage over no training or conventional training based on the primary outcome of composite score of competency. VR training was advantageous over no training based on independent procedure completion (relative risk [RR] = 1.62, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.15 – 2.26, moderate-quality evidence), overall rating of performance (mean difference [MD] 0.45, 95 %CI 0.15 – 0.75, very low-quality evidence), and mucosal visualization (MD 0.60, 95 %CI 0.20 – 1.00, very low-quality evidence). Compared with conventional training, VR training resulted in fewer independent procedure completions (RR = 0.45, 95 %CI 0.27 – 0.74, low-quality evidence). We found no differences between VR training and no training or conventional training for other outcomes. Based on qualitative analysis, we found no significant differences between VR training and other forms of simulation training. VR curricula based in educational theory provided benefit with respect to composite score of competency, compared with unstructured curricula. Conclusions VR simulation training is advantageous over no training and can supplement conventional endoscopy training. There is insufficient evidence that simulation training provides benefit over conventional training.


2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB614
Author(s):  
Rishad Khan ◽  
Joanne Plahouras ◽  
Bradley Johnston ◽  
Michael A. Scaffidi ◽  
Samir C. Grover ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 2547-2554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio E. A. Araujo ◽  
Conor P. Delaney ◽  
Victor E. Seid ◽  
Antonio R. Imperiale ◽  
Alexandre B. Bertoncini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document