scholarly journals Appropriateness of Initiating Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infection Among Nursing Home Residents

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s127-s128
Author(s):  
Taniece R. Eure ◽  
Nicola D. Thompson ◽  
Austin Penna ◽  
Wendy M. Bamberg ◽  
Grant Barney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Emerging Infections ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Uncomplicated Cystitis

Background: Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in nursing homes; urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a frequent indication. Although there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of UTIs, various criteria have been developed to inform and standardize nursing home prescribing decisions, with the goal of reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Using different published criteria designed to guide decisions on initiating treatment of UTIs (ie, symptomatic, catheter-associated, and uncomplicated cystitis), our objective was to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing among NH residents. Methods: In 2017, the CDC Emerging Infections Program (EIP) performed a prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in 161 nursing homes from 10 states: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Tennessee. EIP staff reviewed resident medical records to collect demographic and clinical information, infection signs, symptoms, and diagnostic testing documented on the day an antibiotic was initiated and 6 days prior. We applied 4 criteria to determine whether initiation of treatment for UTI was supported: (1) the Loeb minimum clinical criteria (Loeb); (2) the Suspected UTI Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation tool (UTI SBAR tool); (3) adaptation of Infectious Diseases Society of America UTI treatment guidelines for nursing home residents (Crnich & Drinka); and (4) diagnostic criteria for uncomplicated cystitis (cystitis consensus) (Fig. 1). We calculated the percentage of residents for whom initiating UTI treatment was appropriate by these criteria. Results: Of 248 residents for whom UTI treatment was initiated in the nursing home, the median age was 79 years [IQR, 19], 63% were female, and 35% were admitted for postacute care. There was substantial variability in the percentage of residents with antibiotic initiation classified as appropriate by each of the criteria, ranging from 8% for the cystitis consensus, to 27% for Loeb, to 33% for the UTI SBAR tool, to 51% for Crnich and Drinka (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Appropriate initiation of UTI treatment among nursing home residents remained low regardless of criteria used. At best only half of antibiotic treatment met published prescribing criteria. Although insufficient documentation of infection signs, symptoms and testing may have contributed to the low percentages observed, adequate documentation in the medical record to support prescribing should be standard practice, as outlined in the CDC Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for nursing homes. Standardized UTI prescribing criteria should be incorporated into nursing home stewardship activities to improve the assessment and documentation of symptomatic UTI and to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Measuring Antibiotic Appropriateness for Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Home Residents

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 998-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taniece Eure ◽  
Lisa L. LaPlace ◽  
Richard Melchreit ◽  
Meghan Maloney ◽  
Ruth Lynfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Infect Control Hosp ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Tract Infections

We assessed the appropriateness of initiating antibiotics in 49 nursing home (NH) residents receiving antibiotics for urinary tract infection (UTI) using 3 published algorithms. Overall, 16 residents (32%) received prophylaxis, and among the 33 receiving treatment, the percentage of appropriate use ranged from 15% to 45%. Opportunities exist for improving UTI antibiotic prescribing in NH.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:998–1001

scholarly journals The Urine-culturing Cascade: Variation in Nursing Home Urine Culturing and Association With Antibiotic Use and Clostridiodes difficile Infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 1620-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Antoine Brown ◽  
Nick Daneman ◽  
Kevin L Schwartz ◽  
Bradley Langford ◽  
Allison McGeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Adjusted Risk Ratio ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background Rates of antibiotic use vary widely across nursing homes and cannot be explained by resident characteristics. Antibiotic prescribing for a presumed urinary tract infection is often preceded by inappropriate urine culturing. We examined nursing home urine-culturing practices and their association with antibiotic use. Methods We conducted a longitudinal, multilevel, retrospective cohort study based on quarterly nursing home assessments between April 2014 and January 2017 in 591 nursing homes and covering >90% of nursing home residents in Ontario, Canada. Nursing home urine culturing was measured as the proportion of residents with a urine culture in the prior 14 days. Outcomes included receipt of any systemic antibiotic and any urinary antibiotic (eg, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim/sulfonamides, ciprofloxacin) in the 30 days after the assessment and Clostridiodes difficile infection in the 90 days after the assessment. Adjusted Poisson regression models accounted for 14 resident covariates. Results A total of 131 218 residents in 591 nursing homes were included; 7.9% of resident assessments had a urine culture in the prior 14 days; this proportion was highly variable across the 591 nursing homes (10th percentile = 3.4%, 90th percentile = 14.3%). Before and after adjusting for 14 resident characteristics, nursing home urine culturing predicted total antibiotic use (adjusted risk ratio [RR] per doubling of urine culturing, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–1.23), urinary antibiotic use (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.28–1.38), and C. difficile infection (incidence rate ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.31). Conclusions Nursing homes have highly divergent urine culturing rates; this variability is associated with higher antibiotic use and rates of C. difficile infection.

scholarly journals Reliability of nonlocalizing signs and symptoms as indicators of the presence of infection in nursing-home residents

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Theresa A. Rowe ◽  
Robin L.P. Jump ◽  
Bjørg Marit Andersen ◽  
David B. Banach ◽  
Kristina A. Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Drug Effects ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

Antibiotics are among the most common medications prescribed in nursing homes. The annual prevalence of antibiotic use in residents of nursing homes ranges from 47% to 79%, and more than half of antibiotic courses initiated in nursing-home settings are unnecessary or prescribed inappropriately (wrong drug, dose, or duration). Inappropriate antibiotic use is associated with a variety of negative consequences including Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), adverse drug effects, drug–drug interactions, and antimicrobial resistance. In response to this problem, public health authorities have called for efforts to improve the quality of antibiotic prescribing in nursing homes.

scholarly journals 1082. Hold the Phone: Antibiotic Prescribing Practices Associated with Nonvisit Encounters for Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in Urology Clinics

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S384-S384
Author(s):  
Nina Akbar ◽  
Erica L Dobson ◽  
Michael Keefer ◽  
Sonal Munsiff ◽  
Ghinwa Dumyati
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Medical Provider ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Surveillance data uncovers a high proportion of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms found in the outpatient setting, often in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), underlying urologic abnormalities, and prior treatment for UTIs. We assessed prescribing practices at urology clinics to identify potential stewardship strategies for UTI management. Methods Antibiotic prescription encounters for adult patients from nine urology clinics were obtained from July to September 2018 using the EHR. We collected encounter types (visit or nonvisit), ordering medical provider types, antibiotic classes and patient demographics. A subset of 50 randomized, unique patient telephone encounters (TEs) was reviewed for documentation of a UTI diagnosis, symptoms, urinalysis and culture results, antibiotic prescriptions and duration. Results A total of 1,704 antibiotic orders were identified for 1,210 patients (48% female, median age 69 years, IQR 20). The majority (75%) of antibiotic encounters were from nonvisits: TEs (39%), orders only (25%), refills (9%), and patient email (2%). Major prescribers were advanced practice providers (APPs, 61%) followed by attending physicians (38%). Antibiotics prescribed were fluoroquinolones (FQs, 27%), nitrofurantoin (24%), first-generation cephalosporins (16%), and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (15%). From the subset of 50 TEs, APPs wrote 76% of prescriptions and 32% of all orders were FQs. Thirty-nine patients had a clinical UTI diagnosis, yet 33% (13/39) did not have documentation of at least one urinary sign or symptom. For symptomatic patients, 15% (4/26) did not have a urine culture result within one week before or after the TE date. The distribution of antibiotics prescribed was similar to overall use and the median duration was 7 days. Conclusion Urology practices care for patients with the most complicated urinary tract pathology and appropriate antibiotic use in this population is a challenge. We found that urology providers often prescribe antibiotics to elderly patients without in-person visits, documentation of symptoms or microbiologic evidence of a UTI. Stewardship efforts should involve APPs, developing diagnostic and treatment guidelines for UTIs and improving documentation for antibiotic orders. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Stewardship in Nursing Home: A Narrative Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
M. Tandan
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Tract Infections

The rapid increase in antimicrobial resistance is a great concern in safeguarding the nursing home population. Improving inappropriate prescribing is the main agenda of antimicrobial stewardship. It is complicated to articulate the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribed in nursing home residents, especially the prophylaxis. It is tricky because most of the residents are often on multiple medications, and there are no guidelines available for prescribers to decide on the appropriateness. Except for urinary tract infections, prescribing instructions rarely exists for other infections in nursing homes. Very few studies discuss prophylactic prescribing, and most of them are prevalence studies. These studies showed the urinary tract, respiratory tract, and skin-related problem as the most common cause of antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, this information is presented as total proportion without disaggregated analysis of conditions and types of the urinary and respiratory tract and skin-related infections. Further, the definition used is vague, and significant risk factors of antimicrobial prophylaxis and precision about the use remain unanswered. Lack of appropriate definition and unanswered questions are potentially challenging for stewardship in nursing homes. This review summarizes the current situation of antimicrobial prophylaxis and discusses gaps in the literature and pertinent areas for moving forward for antimicrobial stewardship in nursing home settings.

scholarly journals The Antibiotic Prescribing Pathway for Presumed Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Home Residents

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
pp. 1719-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine E. Kistler ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Kezia Scales ◽  
Kimberly Ward ◽  
David Weber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Tract Infections

scholarly journals Antibiotic Susceptibility of Common Organisms Isolated from Urine Cultures of Nursing Home Residents

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s118-s120
Author(s):  
Austin R. Penna ◽  
Taniece R. Eure Eure ◽  
Nimalie D. Stone ◽  
Grant Barney ◽  
Devra Barter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Susceptibility ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Urine Culture ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Susceptibility Data

Background: With the emergence of antibiotic resistant threats and the need for appropriate antibiotic use, laboratory microbiology information is important to guide clinical decision making in nursing homes, where access to such data can be limited. Susceptibility data are necessary to inform antibiotic selection and to monitor changes in resistance patterns over time. To contribute to existing data that describe antibiotic resistance among nursing home residents, we summarized antibiotic susceptibility data from organisms commonly isolated from urine cultures collected as part of the CDC multistate, Emerging Infections Program (EIP) nursing home prevalence survey. Methods: In 2017, urine culture and antibiotic susceptibility data for selected organisms were retrospectively collected from nursing home residents’ medical records by trained EIP staff. Urine culture results reported as negative (no growth) or contaminated were excluded. Susceptibility results were recorded as susceptible, non-susceptible (resistant or intermediate), or not tested. The pooled mean percentage tested and percentage non-susceptible were calculated for selected antibiotic agents and classes using available data. Susceptibility data were analyzed for organisms with ≥20 isolates. The definition for multidrug-resistance (MDR) was based on the CDC and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control’s interim standard definitions. Data were analyzed using SAS v 9.4 software. Results: Among 161 participating nursing homes and 15,276 residents, 300 residents (2.0%) had documentation of a urine culture at the time of the survey, and 229 (76.3%) were positive. Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella spp, and Enterococcus spp represented 73.0% of all urine isolates (N = 278). There were 215 (77.3%) isolates with reported susceptibility data (Fig. 1). Of these, data were analyzed for 187 (87.0%) (Fig. 2). All isolates tested for carbapenems were susceptible. Fluoroquinolone non-susceptibility was most prevalent among E. coli (42.9%) and P. mirabilis (55.9%). Among Klebsiella spp, the highest percentages of non-susceptibility were observed for extended-spectrum cephalosporins and folate pathway inhibitors (25.0% each). Glycopeptide non-susceptibility was 10.0% for Enterococcus spp. The percentage of isolates classified as MDR ranged from 10.1% for E. coli to 14.7% for P. mirabilis. Conclusions: Substantial levels of non-susceptibility were observed for nursing home residents’ urine isolates, with 10% to 56% reported as non-susceptible to the antibiotics assessed. Non-susceptibility was highest for fluoroquinolones, an antibiotic class commonly used in nursing homes, and ≥ 10% of selected isolates were MDR. Our findings reinforce the importance of nursing homes using susceptibility data from laboratory service providers to guide antibiotic prescribing and to monitor levels of resistance.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None

Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Optimize Treatment of Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 073346482110182
Author(s):  
Sainfer Aliyu ◽  
Jasmine L. Travers ◽  
S. Layla Heimlich ◽  
Joanne Ifill ◽  
Arlene Smaldone
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Meta Analyses

Effects of antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) interventions to optimize antibiotic use for infections in nursing home (NH) residents remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess ASPs in NHs and their effects on antibiotic use, multi-drug-resistant organisms, antibiotic prescribing practices, and resident mortality. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using five databases (1988–2020). Nineteen articles were included, 10 met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased following ASP intervention in eight studies with a pooled decrease of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [4.7, 23.0]; Cochran’s Q = 166,837.8, p < .001, I2 = 99.9%) across studies. Decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use was highest in studies that examined antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI). Education and antibiotic stewardship algorithms for UTI were the most effective interventions. Evidence surrounding ASPs in NH is weak, with recommendations suited for UTIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document