scholarly journals Rapid diagnostic testing for antimicrobial stewardship: Utility in Asia Pacific

Author(s):  
Anucha Apisarnthanarak ◽  
Hong Bin Kim ◽  
Luke Moore ◽  
Yonghong Xiao ◽  
Sanjeev Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) can provide prompt, accurate identification of infectious organisms and be a key component of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs. However, their use is less widespread in Asia Pacific than western countries. Cost can be prohibitive, particularly in less resource-replete settings. A selective approach is required, possibly focusing on the initiation of antimicrobials, for differentiating bacterial versus viral infections and identifying locally relevant tropical diseases. Across Asia Pacific, more data are needed on RDT use within AMS, focusing on the impact on antimicrobial usage, patient morbidity and mortality, and cost effectiveness. Moreover, in the absence of formal guidelines, regional consensus statements to guide clinical practice are warranted. These will provide a regionally relevant definition for RDT; greater consensus on its role in managing infections; advice on implementation and overcoming barriers; and guidance on optimizing human resource capacity. By addressing these issues, the outcomes of AMS programs should improve.

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin McElvania TeKippe

ABSTRACT Rapid diagnostic testing reduces the turnaround time for pathogen identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory, but the impact on patient care and hospital costs is a matter of speculation. Patel et al. (J. Clin. Microbiol. 55:60–67, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01452-16 ) investigate the impact of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in conjunction with active antimicrobial stewardship to determine if implementation is indeed worth the added costs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 2420-2423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Doern

Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefit of the combination of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention and rapid diagnostic testing (RDT). However, few studies have attempted to study the incremental benefit of ASP and RDT, making it difficult to understand the true benefits of each intervention. This issue is discussed in the context of an article by S. H. McVane and F. S. Nolte (J Clin Microbiol 54:2476–2484, 2016,http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1128/JCM.00996-16), with suggestions about how the findings of this study can be applied to other areas of clinical microbiology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 815-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angel Heyerly ◽  
Ron Jones ◽  
Gordon Bokhart ◽  
Mary Shoaff ◽  
Douglas Fisher

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Beganovic ◽  
Tristan T Timbrook ◽  
Sarah M Wieczorkiewicz

Abstract Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs integrated with rapid diagnostic tests optimize patient outcomes and reduce time to effective therapy (TTET) and time to optimal therapy (TTOT). This study identifies predictors of TTET and TTOT among patients with positive blood cultures and identifies limitations to current TTOT definitions and outcomes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Nimmich ◽  
Thomas Smith ◽  
Julie Ann Justo ◽  
P. Brandon Bookstaver ◽  
Katie Hammer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Freiberg ◽  
Connor R. Deri ◽  
Whitney J. Nesbitt ◽  
Romney M. Humphries ◽  
George E. Nelson

Rapid diagnostic testing to identify bloodstream pathogens has arisen as an important tool both to ensure adequate antimicrobial therapy is given early and to aid in antimicrobial stewardship by allowing for more rapid deescalation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the significance of isolates that are not able to be identified by rapid diagnostic testing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S722-S722
Author(s):  
Anndee Gritte ◽  
Teri Hopkins ◽  
Kathleen Morneau ◽  
Christopher R Frei ◽  
Jose Cadena-Zuluaga ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) in microbiology labs shortens the time to identification of bacteria in blood cultures. This study evaluates the impact of implementation of Cepheid® GeneXpert® to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and S. aureus in Gram-positive blood cultures. Methods Patients with positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus spp. before (November 2015–August 2016) and after (November 2017–8/2018) implementation of a new rapid diagnostic technology were evaluated. RDT results were reviewed once daily by the antimicrobial stewardship team. The primary outcome was time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Secondary outcomes included the duration of antimicrobial therapy from time of positive culture, duration of vancomycin therapy, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results A total of 113 patients were in the pre- and 73 patients were in the post-implementation cohort. Patients treated post-RDT demonstrated significantly shorter median time to appropriate therapy (20.6 hours vs. 49.8 hours, P = 0.03) and numerically shorter median duration of vancomycin therapy (3.0 days vs. 1.0 days, P = 0.32). These numerical differences were present despite the post-RDT cohort having significantly more MSSA and MRSA infections. Differences in duration of antimicrobial therapy were not statistically significant. Patients treated pre-RDT demonstrated a shorter median LOS than those treated post-implementation (7.0 days vs. 8.5 days, P = 0.03). Conclusion The use of RDT significantly decreased time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Patients in the post-RDT cohort had longer LOS, which may due to a higher incidence of S. aureus infections, compared with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, in this cohort These results are promising for future RDT interventions. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document