Effect of mean and fluctuating pressure gradients on boundary layer turbulence

2014 ◽  
Vol 748 ◽  
pp. 36-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranav Joshi ◽  
Xiaofeng Liu ◽  
Joseph Katz
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Time Resolved ◽  
Boundary Layer Turbulence ◽  
Scale Turbulence ◽  
Near Wall

AbstractThis study focuses on the effects of mean (favourable) and large-scale fluctuating pressure gradients on boundary layer turbulence. Two-dimensional (2D) particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements, some of which are time-resolved, have been performed upstream of and within a sink flow for two inlet Reynolds numbers, ${Re}_{\theta }(x_{1})=3360$ and 5285. The corresponding acceleration parameters, $K$, are ${1.3\times 10^{-6}}$ and ${0.6\times 10^{-6}}$. The time-resolved data at ${Re}_{\theta }(x_{1})=3360$ enables us to calculate the instantaneous pressure distributions by integrating the planar projection of the fluid material acceleration. As expected, all the locally normalized Reynolds stresses in the favourable pressure gradient (FPG) boundary layer are lower than those in the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) domain. However, the un-scaled stresses in the FPG region increase close to the wall and decay in the outer layer, indicating slow diffusion of near-wall turbulence into the outer region. Indeed, newly generated vortical structures remain confined to the near-wall region. An approximate analysis shows that this trend is caused by higher values of the streamwise and wall-normal gradients of mean streamwise velocity, combined with a slightly weaker strength of vortices in the FPG region. In both boundary layers, adverse pressure gradient fluctuations are mostly associated with sweeps, as the fluid approaching the wall decelerates. Conversely, FPG fluctuations are more likely to accompany ejections. In the ZPG boundary layer, loss of momentum near the wall during periods of strong large-scale adverse pressure gradient fluctuations and sweeps causes a phenomenon resembling local 3D flow separation. It is followed by a growing region of ejection. The flow deceleration before separation causes elevated near-wall small-scale turbulence, while high wall-normal momentum transfer occurs in the ejection region underneath the sweeps. In the FPG boundary layer, the instantaneous near-wall large-scale pressure gradient rarely becomes positive, as the pressure gradient fluctuations are weaker than the mean FPG. As a result, the separation-like phenomenon is markedly less pronounced and the sweeps do not show elevated small-scale turbulence and momentum transfer underneath them. In both boundary layers, periods of acceleration accompanying large-scale ejections involve near-wall spanwise contraction, and a high wall-normal momentum flux at all elevations. In the ZPG boundary layer, although some of the ejections are preceded, and presumably initiated, by regions of adverse pressure gradients and sweeps upstream, others are not. Conversely, in the FPG boundary layer, there is no evidence of sweeps or adverse pressure gradients immediately upstream of ejections. Apparently, the mechanisms initiating these ejections are either different from those involving large-scale sweeps or occur far upstream of the peak in FPG fluctuations.

The Effects of Spatial Resolution in Turbulent Boundary Layers with Pressure Gradients

2012 ◽  
Vol 225 ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zambri Harun ◽  
Mohamad Dali Isa ◽  
Mohammad Rasidi Rasani ◽  
Shahrir Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Layer Flow ◽  
Near Wall

Single normal hot-wire measurements of the streamwise component of velocity were taken in boundary layer flows subjected to pressure gradients at matched friction Reynolds numbers Reτ ≈ 3000. To evaluate spatial resolution effects, the sensor lengths are varied in both adverse pressure gradient (APG) and favorable pressure gradient (FPG). A control boundary layer flow in zero pressure gradient ZPG is also presented. It is shown here that, when the sensor length is maintained a constant value, in a contant Reynolds number, the near-wall peak increases with (adverse) pressure gradient. Both increased contributions of the small- and especially large-scale features are attributed to the increased broadband turbulence intensities. The two-mode increase, one centreing in the near-wall region and the other one in the outer region, makes spatial resolution studies in boundary layer flow more complicated. The increased large-scale features in the near-wall region of an APG flow is similar to large-scales increase due to Reynolds number in ZPG flow. Additionally, there is also an increase of the small-scales in the near-wall region when the boundary layer is exposed to adverse pressure gradient (while the Reynolds number is constant). In order to collapse the near-wall peaks for APG, ZPG and FPG flows, the APG flow has to use the longest sensor and conversely, the FPG has to use the shortest sensor. This study recommends that the empirical prediction by Huthins et. al. (2009) to be reevaluated if pressure gradient flows were to be considered such that the magnitude of the near-wall peak is also a function of the adverse pressure gradient parameter.

Large-scale motions in turbulent boundary layers subjected to adverse pressure gradients

2016 ◽  
Vol 810 ◽  
pp. 323-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hwa Lee
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Large Scale Structures ◽  
Scale Structures ◽  
Layer Flow

It is known that large-scale streamwise velocity-fluctuating structures ($u^{\prime }$) are frequently observed in the log region of a zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer, and that these motions significantly influence near-wall small-scale $u^{\prime }$-structures by modulating the amplitude (Hutchins & Marusic, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 579, 2007, pp. 1–28; Mathis et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 628, 2009, pp. 311–337). In the present study, we provide evidence that the spatial organization of large-scale structures in the log region is significantly influenced by the strength of adverse pressure gradients in turbulent boundary layers based on a direct numerical simulation dataset. For a mild adverse pressure gradient boundary layer flow, groups of hairpin vortices are coherently aligned in the streamwise direction to form hairpin vortex packets, and streamwise merging events of the induced large-scale $u^{\prime }$-structures create a larger streamwise length scale of structures than that for a zero pressure gradient boundary layer flow. As the pressure gradient strength increases further, however, the formation of hairpin packets is continuously suppressed, and large-scale motions are consequently not concatenated to create a longer motion, resulting in a significant reduction of the streamwise coherence of large-scale structures in the log layer. Although energy spectrum maps for $u^{\prime }$-structures show that the large-scale energy is continuously intensified above the log layer with an increase in the pressure gradient, amplitude modulation of the near-wall small-scale motions is dominantly induced by log region large-scale structures for adverse pressure gradient flows. Conditional averaged flow fields with large-scale Q2 and Q4 events indicate that large-scale counter-rotating roll modes play an important role in organizing the flows under the pressure gradients, and the large-scale roll modes associated with Q4 events are more enhanced in the outer layer than those associated with Q2 events, reducing the streamwise coherence of the vortices in a packet.

Pressure gradient effects on the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers

2013 ◽  
Vol 715 ◽  
pp. 477-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zambri Harun ◽  
Jason P. Monty ◽  
Romain Mathis ◽  
Ivan Marusic
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Amplitude Modulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Outer Region ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Scale

AbstractResearch into high-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers in recent years has brought about a renewed interest in the larger-scale structures. It is now known that these structures emerge more prominently in the outer region not only due to increased Reynolds number (Metzger & Klewicki, Phys. Fluids, vol. 13(3), 2001, pp. 692–701; Hutchins & Marusic, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 579, 2007, pp. 1–28), but also when a boundary layer is exposed to an adverse pressure gradient (Bradshaw, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 29, 1967, pp. 625–645; Lee & Sung, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 639, 2009, pp. 101–131). The latter case has not received as much attention in the literature. As such, this work investigates the modification of the large-scale features of boundary layers subjected to zero, adverse and favourable pressure gradients. It is first shown that the mean velocities, turbulence intensities and turbulence production are significantly different in the outer region across the three cases. Spectral and scale decomposition analyses confirm that the large scales are more energized throughout the entire adverse pressure gradient boundary layer, especially in the outer region. Although more energetic, there is a similar spectral distribution of energy in the wake region, implying the geometrical structure of the outer layer remains universal in all cases. Comparisons are also made of the amplitude modulation of small scales by the large-scale motions for the three pressure gradient cases. The wall-normal location of the zero-crossing of small-scale amplitude modulation is found to increase with increasing pressure gradient, yet this location continues to coincide with the large-scale energetic peak wall-normal location (as has been observed in zero pressure gradient boundary layers). The amplitude modulation effect is found to increase as pressure gradient is increased from favourable to adverse.

Modification of Turbulence in Boundary Layers by Mean and Fluctuating Pressure Gradients

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranav Joshi ◽  
Xiaofeng Liu ◽  
Joseph Katz
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Time Resolved ◽  
Freestream Velocity ◽  
Vortical Structures ◽  
Fluctuating Pressure ◽  
Near Wall

In this study we focus on the effect of mean and fluctuating pressure gradients on the structure of boundary layer turbulence. Two dimensional, time-resolved PIV measurements have been performed upstream of and inside an accelerating sink flow for inlet Reynolds number of Reθ = 3071, and acceleration parameter of K=1.1×10−6. The time-resolved data enables us to calculate the planer projection of pressure gradient by integrating the in-plane components of the material acceleration of the fluid (neglecting out-of-plane contribution). We use it to study the effect of boundary layer scale fluctuating pressure gradients ∂p′~/∂x, which are expected to be mostly two-dimensional, on the flow structure. Due to the imposed mean favorable pressure gradient (FPG) within the sink flow, the Reynolds stresses normalized by the local freestream velocity decrease over the entire boundary layer. However, when scaled by the inlet freestream velocity, the stresses increase close to the wall and decrease in the outer part of the boundary layer. This trend is caused by the confinement of the newly generated vortical structures in the near-wall region of the accelerating flow due to combined effects of downward mean flow, and stretching by velocity gradients. Within both the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) and FPG boundary layers, sweeping motions mostly occur during positive fluctuating pressure gradients ∂p′~/∂x>0 as the fluid moving towards the wall is decelerated by the presence of the wall. Vorticity is depleted in the near-wall region, as the wall absorbs −ω′ from the flow by viscous diffusion. On the other hand, ejections occur mostly during periods of favorable fluctuating pressure gradients ∂p′~/∂x<0. During these periods, there is more viscous flux of vorticity −ω′ into the flow, since ∂−ω′/∂y<0 at the wall. Large scale ejection motions associated with ∂p′~/∂x<0 are more likely to transport smaller scale turbulence to the outer region of the boundary layer, while turbulence remains largely confined close to the wall due to the sweeping motions accompanying ∂p′~/∂x>0. During periods of ∂p′~/∂x>0 in the ZPG boundary layer, sweeps tend to increase the momentum in the near-wall region, whereas the adverse pressure gradient decelerates the fluid. These competing effects result in an unstable ω′<0 shear layer which rolls up into coherent vortical structures and increases ω′ω′ near the wall as compared to periods of ∂p′~/∂x<0. Due to the strong mean acceleration of the flow and weaker sweeps in the FPG boundary layer, the formation of an unstable shear layer, and hence vortical structures, is suppressed, decreasing the enstrophy close to the wall as compared to periods of ∂p′~/∂x<0.

scholarly journals Investigation of turbulent boundary layer flows with adverse pressure gradient by means of 3D Lagrangian particle tracking with Shake-The-Box

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Novara ◽  
Daniel Schanz ◽  
Reinhard Geisler ◽  
Janos Agocs ◽  
Felix Eich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Spanwise Direction ◽  
Streamwise Direction ◽  
Lagrangian Particle Tracking ◽  
Lagrangian Particle ◽  
Time Resolved ◽  
Logarithmic Region

A large-scale 3D Lagrangian particle tracking (LPT) investigation of a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) flow developing across different pressure gradient regions is presented in this study. Three high-speed multi-camera imaging systems, LED illumination and helium-filled soap bubbles (HFSB) tracers have been adopted to produce time-resolved sequences of particle images over a large volume encompassing approximately 3 m in the streamwise direction, 0:8 m in the spanwise direction and 0:25 m in the wall-normal direction. Individual tracers have been reconstructed and tracked within the imaged volume by means of the Shake-The-Box algorithm (STB, Schanz et al. (2016)); the FlowFit data assimilation algorithm (Gesemann et al. (2016)) has been used to evaluate the spatial velocity gradients and to interpolate the scattered LPT results onto a regular grid. Thanks to the large size of the investigated volume and to the time-resolved nature of the recorded images, the entire spatial extent of the large-scale coherent motions within the logarithmic region of the TBL (i.e. superstructures) could be captured and their dynamics investigated during their development over several boundary layer thickness in the streamwise direction, from the zero pressure gradient region (ZPG) to the adverse pressure gradient region (APG). Two free-stream velocities were investigated, namely 7 and 14m=s, corresponding to Ret ~ 3,000 and 5,000 respectively. The results confirm the location and scale of the elongated high- and low-momentum structures in the logarithmic region, as well as their meandering in the spanwise direction. Two-point correlation statistics show that the width and spacing of the superstructures are not affected by the transition from the ZPG to the APG region. The analysis of the instantaneous flow realizations from both a Lagrangian and Eulerian perspective indicates the presence of significant fluid particle elements exchange across the interfaces of the large-scale structures.

Predicting Turbulent Boundary Layer Wall Pressure Fluctuations in Adverse Pressure Gradients

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank J. Aldrich
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Wall Pressure ◽  
Prediction Tool ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Wall Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
The Difference

A physics-based approach is employed and a new prediction tool is developed to predict the wavevector-frequency spectrum of the turbulent boundary layer wall pressure fluctuations for subsonic airfoils under the influence of adverse pressure gradients. The prediction tool uses an explicit relationship developed by D. M. Chase, which is based on a fit to zero pressure gradient data. The tool takes into account the boundary layer edge velocity distribution and geometry of the airfoil, including the blade chord and thickness. Comparison to experimental adverse pressure gradient data shows a need for an update to the modeling constants of the Chase model. To optimize the correlation between the predicted turbulent boundary layer wall pressure spectrum and the experimental data, an optimization code (iSIGHT) is employed. This optimization module is used to minimize the absolute value of the difference (in dB) between the predicted values and those measured across the analysis frequency range. An optimized set of modeling constants is derived that provides reasonable agreement with the measurements.

The Effect of Real Turbine Roughness With Pressure Gradient on Heat Transfer

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P. Bons ◽  
Stephen T. McClain
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Combined Effects ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Smooth Wall ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
Integral Boundary ◽  
Favorable Pressure Gradient

Experimental measurements of heat transfer (St) are reported for low speed flow over scaled turbine roughness models at three different freestream pressure gradients: adverse, zero (nominally), and favorable. The roughness models were scaled from surface measurements taken on actual, in-service land-based turbine hardware and include samples of fuel deposits, TBC spallation, erosion, and pitting as well as a smooth control surface. All St measurements were made in a developing turbulent boundary layer at the same value of Reynolds number (Rex≅900,000). An integral boundary layer method used to estimate cf for the smooth wall cases allowed the calculation of the Reynolds analogy (2St/cf). Results indicate that for a smooth wall, Reynolds analogy varies appreciably with pressure gradient. Smooth surface heat transfer is considerably less sensitive to pressure gradients than skin friction. For the rough surfaces with adverse pressure gradient, St is less sensitive to roughness than with zero or favorable pressure gradient. Roughness-induced Stanton number increases at zero pressure gradient range from 16–44% (depending on roughness type), while increases with adverse pressure gradient are 7% less on average for the same roughness type. Hot-wire measurements show a corresponding drop in roughness-induced momentum deficit and streamwise turbulent kinetic energy generation in the adverse pressure gradient boundary layer compared with the other pressure gradient conditions. The combined effects of roughness and pressure gradient are different than their individual effects added together. Specifically, for adverse pressure gradient the combined effect on heat transfer is 9% less than that estimated by adding their separate effects. For favorable pressure gradient, the additive estimate is 6% lower than the result with combined effects. Identical measurements on a “simulated” roughness surface composed of cones in an ordered array show a behavior unlike that of the scaled “real” roughness models. St calculations made using a discrete-element roughness model show promising agreement with the experimental data. Predictions and data combine to underline the importance of accounting for pressure gradient and surface roughness effects simultaneously rather than independently for accurate performance calculations in turbines.

Triadic scale interactions in a turbulent boundary layer

2015 ◽  
Vol 767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrahmanyam Duvvuri ◽  
Beverley J. McKeon
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Velocity Signal ◽  
Small Scales ◽  
Amplitude Modulation Coefficient ◽  
Scale Turbulence ◽  
Scale Motion ◽  
Phase Relationships

AbstractA formal relationship between the skewness and the correlation coefficient of large and small scales, termed the amplitude modulation coefficient, is established for a general statistically stationary signal and is analysed in the context of a turbulent velocity signal. Both the quantities are seen to be measures of phase in triadically consistent interactions between scales of turbulence. The naturally existing phase relationships between large and small scales in a turbulent boundary layer are then manipulated by exciting a synthetic large-scale motion in the flow using a spatially impulsive dynamic wall roughness perturbation. The synthetic scale is seen to alter the phase relationships, or the degree of modulation, in a quasi-deterministic manner by exhibiting a phase-organizing influence on the small scales. The results presented provide encouragement for the development of a practical framework for favourable manipulation of energetic small-scale turbulence through large-scale inputs in a wall-bounded turbulent flow.

A supersonic turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient

1990 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 285-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emerick M. Fernando ◽  
Alexander J. Smits
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Distribution ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Large Scale Structures ◽  
Streamline Curvature ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Scale Structures

This investigation describes the effects of an adverse pressure gradient on a flat plate supersonic turbulent boundary layer (Mf ≈ 2.9, βx ≈ 5.8, Reθ, ref ≈ 75600). Single normal hot wires and crossed wires were used to study the Reynolds stress behaviour, and the features of the large-scale structures in the boundary layer were investigated by measuring space–time correlations in the normal and spanwise directions. Both the mean flow and the turbulence were strongly affected by the pressure gradient. However, the turbulent stress ratios showed much less variation than the stresses, and the essential nature of the large-scale structures was unaffected by the pressure gradient. The wall pressure distribution in the current experiment was designed to match the pressure distribution on a previously studied curved-wall model where streamline curvature acted in combination with bulk compression. The addition of streamline curvature affects the turbulence strongly, although its influence on the mean velocity field is less pronounced and the modifications to the skin-friction distribution seem to follow the empirical correlations developed by Bradshaw (1974) reasonably well.

Turbulent boundary layers in decreasing adverse pressure gradients

1966 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Streamwise Direction ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Boundary Layer Development ◽  
Regional Similarity ◽  
Layer Development

The results of a detailed mean velocity survey of a smooth-wall turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient are described. Close to the wall, a variety of profiles shapes were observed. Progressing in the streamwise direction, logarithmic, ½-power, linear and$\frac{3}{2}$-power distributions seemed to form, and generally each predominated at a different stage of the boundary-layer development. It is believed that the phenomenon occurred because of the nature of the pressure gradient imposed (an initially high gradient which fell to low values as the boundary layer developed) and attempts are made to describe the flow by an extension of the regional similarity hypothesis proposed by Perry, Bell & Joubert (1966). Data from other sources is limited but comparisons with the author's results are encouraging.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document