scholarly journals The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science

2006 ◽  
Vol 100 (04) ◽  
pp. 627 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES N. DRUCKMAN ◽  
DONALD P. GREEN ◽  
JAMES H. KUKLINSKI ◽  
ARTHUR LUPIA
Author(s):  
JAMES N. DRUCKMAN ◽  
DONALD P. GREEN ◽  
JAMES H. KUKLINSKI ◽  
ARTHUR LUPIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1130-1131
Author(s):  
Henry E. Brady

Experimental approaches to political science research have become increasingly prominent in the discipline. Experimental research is regularly featured in some of the discipline’s top journals, and indeed in 2014 a new Journal of Experimental Political Science was created, published by Cambridge University Press. At the same time, there are disagreements among political scientists about the limits of experimental research, the ethical challenges associated with this research, and the general model of social scientific inquiry underlying much experimental research. Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, edited by Dawn Langan Teele (Yale University Press 2015), brings together many interesting perspectives on these issues. And so we have invited a number of political scientists to comment on the book, the issues it raises, and the more general question of “the uses and abuses of experimentation in the social sciences.”


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux ◽  
Rick Wilson ◽  
Cheryl Boudreau ◽  
Sarah Bush ◽  
Jennifer Jerit ◽  
...  

We are excited and honored to be the editorial team for JEPS. We are indebted to Eric Dickson for his efforts as the journal's previous editor. He set a high bar for JEPS as an outlet for high quality experimental research. Lucky for us, the healthy state of experimental research means that we will continue to have a deep pool of well-crafted and important work. We also thank Nick Haas, who deftly guided us through the transition as Editorial Assistant. Without his help, it would have been a near impossible task to get up to speed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana C. Mutz ◽  
Robin Pemantle

AbstractIn this essay, we closely examine three aspects of the Reporting Guidelines for this journal, as described by Gerber et al. (2014, Journal of Experimental Political Science 1(1): 81–98) in the inaugural issue of the Journal of Experimental Political Science. These include manipulation checks and when the reporting of response rates is appropriate. The third, most critical, issue concerns the committee's recommendations for detecting errors in randomization. This is an area where there is evidence of widespread confusion about experimental methods throughout our major journals. Given that a goal of the Journal of Experimental Political Science is promoting best practices and a better understanding of experimental methods across the discipline, we recommend changes to the Standards that will allow the journal to play a leading role in correcting these misunderstandings.


Author(s):  
Steven Brooke

This chapter focuses on population-based experimental research, a relative novelty in Middle East political science. It is an attempt to identify some of the challenges this methodology offers and provide tangible ways to mitigate them, including strategies for monitoring, nesting experimental approaches in rich contextual knowledge, and planning for failure. These suggestions are discussed in the context of the author’s experiences conducting population-based experiments in Egypt.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1132-1132
Author(s):  
Yanna Krupnikov

Experimental approaches to political science research have become increasingly prominent in the discipline. Experimental research is regularly featured in some of the discipline’s top journals, and indeed in 2014 a new Journal of Experimental Political Science was created, published by Cambridge University Press. At the same time, there are disagreements among political scientists about the limits of experimental research, the ethical challenges associated with this research, and the general model of social scientific inquiry underlying much experimental research. Field Experiments and Their Critics: Essays on the Uses and Abuses of Experimentation in the Social Sciences, edited by Dawn Langan Teele (Yale University Press 2015), brings together many interesting perspectives on these issues. And so we have invited a number of political scientists to comment on the book, the issues it raises, and the more general question of “the uses and abuses of experimentation in the social sciences.”


Author(s):  
Diani Octaviyanti Handajani ◽  
Suprapti Suprapti ◽  
Ria Muji Rahayu ◽  
Endah Mulyani ◽  
Sulastri Sulastri

Breastfeeding is very important in Growth and development of children both physically and mentally optimally and improve children's intelligence, and prevent children from diseases such as diarrhea, pneumonia and malnutrition which are common causes of death in children under 5 years. In breastfeeding, many factors influence, one of which is giving with loving touch baby massage. Giving with loving touch baby massage is expected to affect the frequency of breastfeeding and can increase the closeness of the child to the parents (Bonding). This research is a quasi-experimental research, namely research that aims to determine the effect that will arise after being given treatment, namely baby massage. The population in this study were 30 children under five in Domas Village, Gresik Regency. The independent variable in this study was loving touch baby massage, the dependent variable was the frequency of breastfeeding. The statistical test used was the Paired Sample T-Test. The results of this study can be concluded that there is an effect of baby massage on the frequency of breastfeeding and has a frequency of breastfeeding 7 times - 10 times / day greater than babies who are not done loving touch baby massage.


1987 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Bositis ◽  
Douglas Steinel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document