Small States, Nationalism and Institutional Capacities: An Explanation of the Difference in Response of Ireland and Denmark to the Financial Crisis
2015 ◽
Vol 56
(1)
◽
pp. 143-174
◽
Keyword(s):
AbstractThis paper uses theories of small states (e.g. Katzenstein) and nationalism (e.g. Gellner) to explain why Denmark and Ireland responded to the 2008 financial crisis in different ways. In Denmark, a coordinated market economy with considerable corporatism and state intervention, the private sector shouldered much of the financial burden for rescuing the banking sector. In Ireland, a liberal market economy without much corporatism or state intervention, the state shouldered the burden. The difference stems in large part from the fact that Denmark had comparatively thick institutions and a strong sense of nationalism whereas Ireland did not. Lessons for the theories of small states and nationalism are explored.
Keyword(s):
Bank Structure and Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from Emerging Markets During the 2008 Financial Crisis
2017 ◽
Vol 20
(03)
◽
pp. 1750015
◽