Relationship of grain yield with carbon isotope discrimination and ash content in lines derived from a bread wheat cultivar

2005 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. TSIALTAS ◽  
I. S. TOKATLIDIS ◽  
E. TAMOUTSIDIS ◽  
I. XYNIAS
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Carbon Isotope ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Carbon Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Selection Criterion ◽  
Ash Content ◽  
Individual Plant ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Relationship Of

The objective was to explore, in lines derived from a bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar, the association of grain yield with carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) and ash content (Ash) determined in both flag leaf and kernel. Divergent selection within the cv. Nestos, based on individual plant yield under very low density (11547 plants/ha), produced 20 lines. Progeny evaluation was conducted in two sites of Northern Hellas (Greece) at both low (11547 plants/ha) and high (5000000 plants/ha) density. The results showed significant differences between lines for grain yield, Δ and Ash. However, only the conclusions on grain yield were similar in low and high density, perhaps because the selection criterion under low density was grain yield. This, combined with the lack of any strong relationship of grain yield with either Δ or Ash, failed to confirm the usefulness of these physiological traits as indirect selection criteria, when the within-cultivar variation for grain yield is exploited. The possible association of grain yield with Δ and Ash appeared to be influenced by various factors such as drought, level of grain yield and altitude. Results also showed that less plant-to-plant variability, as expressed by the coefficients of variation (CV) of single-plant yields, was associated with decreased drought response and higher yield stability. The less stressed lines were those that used water more conservatively till anthesis and maintained a high photosynthetic rate during grain filling.

scholarly journals Ash content might predict carbon isotope discrimination and grain yield in durum wheat

2001 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Othmane Merah ◽  
Eliane Deléens ◽  
Irenée Souyris ◽  
Philippe Monneveux
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Carbon Isotope ◽  
Carbon Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Ash Content ◽  
Isotope Discrimination

Relationship between grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination in bread wheat under four water regimes

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Monneveux ◽  
Matthew P. Reynolds ◽  
Richard Trethowan ◽  
Hector González-Santoyo ◽  
Roberto J. Peña ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Carbon Isotope ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Carbon Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Water Regimes

Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain

1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Voltas ◽  
I. Romagosa ◽  
A. Lafarga ◽  
A. P. Armesto ◽  
A. Sombrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Carbon Isotope ◽  
Carbon Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Selection Criterion ◽  
Yield Potential ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Environment Interaction ◽  
Crossover Point ◽  
Hordeum Vulgare L ◽  
Isotope Discrimination

Carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) has been found to be either positively or negatively related to grain yield of small grain cereals when grown in contrasting environments. In order to clarify a possible association between grain yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Δ of mature kernels, five 6-rowed and five 2-rowed barley cultivars were evaluated in 22 rainfed environments of northern Mediterranean Spain. Analyses of variance suggested that the genotypic Δ values were more consistent across environments than the genotypic yields. Genotype×environment (G×E) interaction for grain yield was further explored by fitting an AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) model. The first 2 multiplicative axes were found significant. The AMMI2 model provided more accurate estimates of genotypic yields within environments than the conventional unadjusted means across replicates. AMMI2 estimates were used for input into cluster analysis, grouping environments that ranked genotypic yields similarly. Three major groups were obtained, with average yields of 2.42 t/ha (cluster I), 3.06 t/ha (cluster II), and 5.16 t/ha (cluster III). The genotypic ranking for Δ did not vary substantially across clusters, but it changed for grain yield. The average genotypic yields in the low-yielding cluster I ranked opposite to those in the high-yielding cluster III, suggesting the existence of a crossover point at an intermediate yield level. The association between grain yield and Δ for genotypic means within clusters was variable. In cluster I, yield and Δ tended to be negatively related, whereas they were positively related in clusters II and III. Genotypes with lower Δ, i.e. with higher transpiration efficiency, performed better in low-yielding environments (mostly those grouped in cluster I). On the contrary, a high genotypic Δ was of advantage in medium (cluster II) and high-yielding environments (cluster III). This observation supports the assumption that drought tolerance and high yield potential under non-limiting growing conditions may be antagonistic concepts in barley. Genotypic means for kernel number per m 2 and Δ were consistently and positively related within clusters, suggesting that a constitutively high Δ may have been driven by a large genotypic reproductive sink. The convenience of using Δ as a selection criterion in areas exhibiting a considerable G×E interaction for grain yield is discussed.

Relationships between ash content, carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 835 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Araus ◽  
T. Amaro ◽  
J. Casadesús ◽  
A. Asbati ◽  
M.M. Nachit
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Carbon Isotope ◽  
Carbon Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Flag Leaf ◽  
Dry Mass ◽  
Ash Content ◽  
The Other ◽  
Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Mass Basis

The relationships between ash content, carbon isotope discrimination and yield were studied in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) grown in a Mediterranean region (north-western Syria) under three different water regimes (hereafter referred to as environments). Ash content (on dry mass basis) was measured in the flag leaf about 3 weeks after anthesis (leaf ash) and in mature kernels (kernel ash), whereas Δ was analysed in the penultimate leaf at heading (leaf Δ) and in mature kernels (kernel Δ). Leaf Δ was weakly or not related with the other parameters. Leaf ash correlated positively with kernel Δ (P≤0.001), even in the driest environment, which gave a mean yield of 1.5 t ha-1. For the four parameters, correlations with yield remained significant (P≤0.001) after correcting for days to heading. All the parameters showed a higher broad-sense heritability than yield. The parameter that showed the best genetic correlation with grain yield was kernel ash (r2= 0.88), followed by kernel Δ (r2 = 0.69) and leaf ash (r2 = 0.64), whereas leaf Δ (r2 = 0.26) was the least correlated parameter. Except for kernel ash, these parameters always correlated positively with grain yield. The negative relationships of kernel ash (on dry mass basis) with yield and all the other parameters may be attributable to the finding that kernel ash was higher in those genotypes more affected by drought during grain filling. Thus, kernel ash was negatively related (P≤0.001) with total kernel mass per spike. Prediction of grain yield through multiple linear regression suggests that kernel ash can be used as complementary criterion to either kernel Δ or leaf ash.

Relationships of grain carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) and ash content with yield and quality in dry bean

2010 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. TSIALTAS ◽  
I. I. PAPADOPOULOS ◽  
E. G. TAMOUTSIDIS ◽  
I. S. TOKATLIDIS
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Isotope ◽  
Carbon Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Strong Stability ◽  
Ash Content ◽  
Environment Interaction ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Dry Bean ◽  
Isotope Discrimination ◽  
Honeycomb Selection ◽  
Dense Stand

SUMMARYDry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a traditional crop of north-western Macedonia, Greece, where two landraces (plaki Prespas and Chrisoupoli) in particular are grown. The aim of this study was to test whether the grain carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) and ash content (ASH) are related to grain yield (GY), protein content (PC) and mean grain weight (MGW) in dry bean. As a part of a honeycomb selection programme, 21 genotypes (19 lines derived via intra-landrace honeycomb selection for single plant yield at low density plus the two original populations) were grown at two densities, 1·2 and 4·8 plants/m2 under non-limiting water conditions in a glasshouse and in the field. Genotypes differed significantly for Δ, ASH and PC under the low density. In the dense stand, genotypes differed significantly only for ASH and PC. The environment (glasshouse or field conditions) affected all the traits significantly. Neither Δ nor ASH showed strong or consistent relationships with GY and thus, they cannot serve as reliable, indirect selection criteria for GY. Strong, negative relationships between Δ and PC were found especially in the dense stand, confirming analogous results in C3 cereals. Inconsistent genotypic ranking for grain physiological traits under the different densities and environments was indicative of large genotype×environment interaction. Genotypes performed consistently for GY and MGW under both densities, showing the strong stability of these traits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document