scholarly journals IPO Timing, Buyout Sponsors’ Exit Strategies, and Firm Performance of RLBOs

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1001-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry X. Cao
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Operating Efficiency ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Reverse Leveraged Buyouts ◽  
Restructuring Process ◽  
Probability Of Bankruptcy ◽  
Exit Strategies ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Duration Experience

AbstractThis paper studies the impact of buyout sponsors’ initial public offering (IPO) timing on the leveraged buyout (LBO) restructuring process and subsequent exit strategies. I find that LBO duration is negatively related to hot IPO market conditions. Further, following IPOs, reverse leveraged buyouts (RLBOs) with shorter LBO duration experience greater deterioration of performance and higher probability of bankruptcy. This suggests that sponsors’ efforts to enhance operating efficiency succumb to market timing. IPO timing does not affect sponsors’ exit strategies and monitoring post IPO. Sponsors keep an active long-run presence with more reputable sponsors who are more likely to exit by facilitating takeovers.

FAMILY FIRM IPO PERFORMANCE AND MARKET SIGNALS

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 55-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
HUNG-BIN DING ◽  
KUNTARA PUKTHUANTHONG-LE
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Family Firms ◽  
Family Firm ◽  
Ipo Performance ◽  
Market Signals ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
Long Term Performance ◽  
Term Performance ◽  
The Impact

Recently, the interests in the performance of family firms in the capital market are on the rise. However studies on long-term performance give us little information about the performance of family firms in the initial public offering (IPO) markets. Building on agency theory, we investigated the effect of three IPO signals in family firm IPOs. Practices such as the appointment of outside non-family directors and waiting longer before going public significantly reduce underpricing. In addition, family owners' intent to retain large percentage of share in the long run is an indication of original shareholders' level of confidence in their own companies. Such confidence helps reduce after market investors' uncertainty and thus underpricing. On the other hand, family ownership at the IPO positively moderates the impact of non-family directors on underpricing.

scholarly journals Corporate governance and IPO underpricing: evidence from the italian market

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Teti ◽  
Ilaria Montefusco
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Stock Option ◽  
Board Members ◽  
Ipo Underpricing ◽  
Italian Market ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Effect

AbstractThis paper aims to analyse the impact of firms’ corporate governance characteristics on the degree of first-day returns (i.e., underpricing) in the Italian initial public offering (IPO) market. In particular, this work investigates the impacts of the characteristics of boards of directors (BoDs) and ownership structure on the underpricing of newly offered shares. By studying a sample of 128 Italian IPOs between 2000 and 2016, it is concluded that corporate governance characteristics affect the degree of first-day returns following a company’s IPO. More specifically, the size of the BoD negatively affects underpricing, while the ownership of institutional investors and board members has a positive effect on the degree of underpricing. Conversely, no significant evidence is found with regard to board independence, the number of female directors in the boardroom, the implementation of stock option plans and ownership concentration.

Friends in high places : two essays on the importance of corporate political connections

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Reza Houston
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Political Connections ◽  
Target Firm ◽  
University Of Missouri ◽  
Accounting Performance ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The University ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] This study is an examination of the relationship between political connections and the undertaking of major firm events. In our first essay, presented in Chapter 3, we examine the impact politically connected appointments have on firm acquisition behavior. Using proxy statements, we create a unique database of politically connected bidders and merger targets. We find that bidders who hire connected individuals to the board or management team are more likely to avoid merger litigation. Connected bidders make more bids after the appointment. These firms also bid on larger targets. We determine there is a positive relation between the control premium and the relative of the target's connections. Connected acquirers have superior post-merger accounting performance, particularly when they acquire a connected target firm. In the second essay, presented in Chapter 4, we examine the relationship between political connections of private firms and the initial public offering process. Using registration statement information, we create a unique database of politically connected IPO firms. We find that political connections are substitutes to high-quality underwriters and big four auditors. Politically connected firms manage earnings more highly upward than non-connected firms prior to the public offering. Politically connected firms also exhibit less underpricing than non-connected firms. Politically connected IPO firms also have superior post-IPO returns relative to non-connected IPO firms.

Groupon: let's make a deal?

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-38
Author(s):  
Susan White
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Media Companies ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
Media Firms ◽  
Term Performance

Synopsis Groupon, an online coupon company, was one of many companies that considered an initial public offering (IPO) during what might be a second technology/internet/social media IPO boom in 2011. Some companies chose to postpone their IPOs, while others took advantage of the media attention focussed on technology companies, and in particular, social media firms. Should investors hop on the tech IPO bandwagon, or hold off to better evaluate the long-term prospects of tech companies, and in particular social media companies? Would the valuation of Groupon justify an investment in IPO shares? Research methodology The case was researched from secondary sources, using Groupon's IPO filing information, news articles about the IPO and industry research sources, such as IBIS World. Relevant courses and levels This case is appropriate for an advanced undergraduate or MBA corporate finance or investment elective. Most introductory finance classes do not have the time to cover later chapters in a finance textbook, where information about IPOs is generally found. It could also be used at the end of a core finance course, where the instructor wanted to introduce this topic through a case study of a hard-to-value internet-based company to illustrate the difficulties in setting IPO prices. The case could also be used in an equity analysis class, an entrepreneurial finance class or an investment class, to spur discussion about valuing an internet company and choosing appropriate investments for pension fund investing. This case could also be used in a strategy class, focussing on the five forces question, and eliminating the valuation question. Theoretical basis There is a great deal of literature about IPOs and their long-term performance. An excellent source is Jay R. Ritter's research, http://bear.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter, which has a longer time period and more data than could be contained in this case. IPO puzzles include persistent undervaluing of IPOs; in other words, the offer price is lower than, and sometimes substantially lower than, the first day close price. A second issue is the generally poorer long-run performance of companies after their IPO when compared to similar firms that did not do an IPO.

scholarly journals Does Leverage Constrain Real and AEM Around IPO Corporate Event? Evidence from the Emerging Market

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-367
Author(s):  
Sani Hussaini Kalgo ◽  
Bany-Ariffin A.N. ◽  
Hairul Suhaimi Bin Nahar ◽  
Bolaji Tunde Matemilola
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Agency Cost ◽  
Free Cash Flow ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Impact

The article investigates whether Malaysian initial public offering (IPO) firms engage in real and accrual earnings management (AEM) and examines the impact of leverage on the earnings management’s discretionary behaviour of the firms for the period of 2003–2013. The Dechow, Sloan, and Sweeney (1995, The Accounting Review, 70[2], 193–225) cross-sectional modified Jones model was used to estimate discretionary accruals, while Roychowdhury’s (2006, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42[3]), 335–370) cross-sectional models were used to investigate abnormal real activity discretionary behaviour. The results indicate Malaysian IPO firms engage in real and accrual discretionary behaviour. The graphical presentations of the earnings’ management proxies indicate higher real and AEM for high-leverage firms. Similarly, the multivariate analysis indicates a positive relationship between leverage and earnings management, which is in tandem with the agency cost of free cash flow theory and debt hypothesis. It is also consistent with the pecking-order theory of capital structure. This study suggests that regulatory agencies and standard setters should continue to improve quality of accounting reports in order to protect investors’ invested capital.

scholarly journals The Impact of R&D Alliance on the Survival of Newly Listed High Tech Firms

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Vicar S. Valencia
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Longitudinal Data ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
The United States ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Estimation Strategy ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Impact

This paper investigates the extent to which R&D alliance participation affects the survival performance of newly listed high tech firms. The estimation strategy identifies the impact through changes on a firm’s alliance status. Using longitudinal data on high tech firms that had an initial public offering in the United States, results suggest that R&D collaborating firms experience greater survival, relative to non-R&D collaborating firms. In particular, participation in an R&D alliance is associated with an attenuation of delistment due to poor financial performance.

ASIAN AMERICAN-FOUNDED VENTURES IN SILICON VALLEY: CHALLENGES, STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP, AND PERFORMANCE

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 355-375
Author(s):  
DAVID Y. CHOI ◽  
DONG CHEN ◽  
WOO JIN LEE
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Asian American ◽  
Silicon Valley ◽  
Share Price ◽  
Strategic Partnership ◽  
Strategic Partnerships ◽  
Ipo Performance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Impact

This paper examines the performance of Silicon Valley ventures with Asian-American founding teams. We review some challenges faced by these ventures, compare their performance with that of other ventures, and analyze the impact of strategic partnerships on their performance. Our results indicate that firms founded by Asian American entrepreneurs tend to require more time to reach initial public offering (IPO) status than do other ventures in Silicon Valley. Our results further show that, despite needing this extra time, Asian American-founded ventures significantly outperformed their counterparts in 12-month post-IPO share price gain. This superior short-term post-IPO performance suggests that Asian American firms, particularly those that lacked relationships with U.S.-based strategic investors, might have been undervalued prior to and at IPO.

The Effect Of Geographic Dispersion On The Initial And Long-Run IPO Performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 869-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgur Ozdemir
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Geographic Dispersion ◽  
Ipo Performance ◽  
Geographically Dispersed ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Short Run ◽  
Restaurant Firms ◽  
Public Offering

This study examines the effect of geographic dispersion on the short-run and long-run initial public offering (IPO) performance of restaurant firms. Sample of the study consists of 103 restaurant IPOs conducted between 1981 and 2011. The study finds that being geographically dispersed or concentrated in a small area does not lead to a significant difference in the initial returns of restaurant IPOs. Yet the analysis shows that restaurant firms with geographically dispersed operations have significantly higher long-run returns in the post-IPO period compared with their local counterparts. This is evidenced by the significantly larger cumulative abnormal returns for geographically dispersed restaurant firms in the post-IPO period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document