scholarly journals Follow-up after treatment for head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S2) ◽  
pp. S208-S211 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Simo ◽  
J Homer ◽  
P Clarke ◽  
K Mackenzie ◽  
V Paleri ◽  
...  

AbstractThis is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. In the absence of high-level evidence base for follow-up practices, the duration and frequency are often at the discretion of local centres. By reviewing the existing literature and collating experience from varying practices across the UK, this paper provides recommendations on the work up and management of lateral skull base cancer based on the existing evidence base for this rare condition.Recommendations• Patients should be followed up to a minimum of five years with a prolonged follow-up for selected patients. (G)• Patients should be followed up at least two monthly in the first two years and three to six monthly in the subsequent years. (G)• Patients should be seen in dedicated multidisciplinary head and neck oncology clinics. (G)• Patients should be followed up by dedicated multidisciplinary clinical teams. (G)• The multidisciplinary follow-up team should include clinical nurse specialists, speech and language therapists, dietitians and other allied health professionals in the role of key workers. (G)• Clinical assessment should include adequate clinical examination including fibre-optic rigid or flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. (R)• Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography imaging should be used when recurrence is suspected. (R)• Narrow band imaging can be used in the follow-up in selected sites. (R)• Second primary tumours should be part of rationale of follow-up and therefore adequate screening strategies should be used to detect them. (G)• Patients should be educated with regard to the appearance and detection of recurrences. (G)• Patients with persistent pain should be investigated to exclude recurrent disease. (R)• Patients should be offered support with tobacco and alcohol cessation services. (R)

2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (10) ◽  
pp. 991-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kumar ◽  
G Putnam ◽  
P Dyson ◽  
A K Robson

AbstractBackground:Follow-up surveillance of head and neck cancer patients varies throughout the UK. The heterogeneity of these patients limits the applicability of a standardised protocol. Improvements in our understanding of the natural history of the disease may assist in the tailoring of resources to patients.Method:Prospective data collected at the Cumberland Infirmary over a 13-year period were analysed, primarily focusing upon recurrence rates and time to recurrence.Results:In keeping with other studies, recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma was found to be maximal within the first three years of treatment, regardless of subsite.Conclusion:Hospital-based surveillance may be safely discontinued after three years for some patients. Laryngeal carcinoma may require further surveillance due to possible delayed recurrence of a second primary formation. Emphasis must be placed on patient education, accessibility to head and neck services, and the existence of a robust system to facilitate urgent referrals.


2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 576-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kapila Manikantan ◽  
Raghav C Dwivedi ◽  
Suhail I Sayed ◽  
KA Pathak ◽  
Rehan Kazi

Follow-up in head and neck cancer (HNC) is essential to detect and manage locoregional recurrence or metastases, or second primary tumours at the earliest opportunity. A variety of guidelines and investigations have been published in the literature. This has led to oncologists using different guidelines across the globe. The follow-up protocols may have unnecessary investigations that may cause morbidity or discomfort to the patient and may have significant cost implications. In this evidence-based review we have tried to evaluate and address important issues like the frequency of follow-up visits, clinical and imaging strategies adopted, and biochemical methods used for the purpose. This review summarises strategies for follow-up, imaging modalities and key investigations in the literature published between 1980 and 2009. A set of recommendations is also presented for cost-effective, simple yet efficient surveillance in patients with head and neck cancer.


Author(s):  
Viresh Arora ◽  
Bhushan Kathuria ◽  
Madhuri Arora

<p class="abstract">Management of head and neck cancer defects has been challenging owing to the complexity of the created defects. Various local and regional flaps to free flaps have been described in the reconstruction of cancer defects, each of them having it’s own merits and limitations, therefore none of them appears as an ideal one. A Submandibular gland flap (SMGF) technique has emerged as a versatile flap having advantages of a regional and a free flap. In this study, eleven patients (four tongue, six buccal mucosa defects and one retromolar trigone defect) underwent reconstruction of oral cavity cancer defects with SMGF. The outcomes of the SMGF were evaluated in terms of the ease of harvest, functional outcome, and postoperative complications. The mean defect size and the flap dimensions were 4.4×3.9 cm and 3.6×3.3 cm respectively. One patient suffered wound infection resulting in partial flap necrosis with wound dehiscence. In the follow-up period one patient developed contra nodal recurrence and another patient developed a second primary on the contralateral base of the tongue. This study showed that SMGF is an excellent flap for the reconstruction of oral cavity cancer defects because of its reliability, versatility and its relative ease of application.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Imbimbo ◽  
Salvatore Alfieri ◽  
Laura Botta ◽  
Cristiana Bergamini ◽  
Annunziata Gloghini ◽  
...  

Objective There is no consensus on the follow-up modalities in patients with head and neck cancer. This study aims to describe the pattern and survival outcomes of recurrences/second primary cancers in patients undergoing an intensive radiologic and clinical follow-up. Study Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Single academic tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods All patients with stage III-IV head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 1998 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Persistent/recurrent disease within 6 months since the curative treatment and second primary cancers outside the upper aerodigestive tract were excluded. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Surveillance was planned every 3 months in the first year, then with increasing intervals till the fifth year. Results A total of 326 patients were included. Out of all detected cancer recurrences (n = 106, 32%), 38 (36%) were locoregional, 44 (41%) were distant, and 24 (23%) were second primary cancers. Approximately 70% of recurrences were clinically and/or radiologically discovered, while 30% were diagnosed due to the patients’ symptoms. Of all clinically and/or radiologically discovered recurrences/second primary cancers (n = 74), 26 (35%) were curatively treated, with respect to 9 of the 32 (28%) diagnosed by symptoms. Median overall survival of recurrent curable cases did not significantly differ according to the detection modality (89 months by clinical/radiologic examination vs 85 by symptoms). Conclusions Clinical and radiologic follow-up identified more recurrences/second primary cancers than the symptom-driven monitoring, but the curability of cancer recurrence was similar regardless of detection modality. Prospective trials are needed to define the most effective follow-up strategy in head and neck cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 585-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hammaad Khan ◽  
Karan Jolly

Laryngeal cancer is the most common form of head and neck cancer in the UK. The majority of cases are in people aged 60 years and over. Early diagnosis improves long-term outcomes and requires early recognition of significant symptoms and prompt referral. This article aims to provide an overview of the presenting features, investigation, management and follow-up of laryngeal cancer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S Tobias ◽  
Kathryn Monson ◽  
Nirmal Gupta ◽  
Hugh MacDougall ◽  
John Glaholm ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Joshi ◽  
F. Calman ◽  
M. O'Connell ◽  
J.-P. Jeannon ◽  
P. Pracy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document