Surveillance of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer with an Intensive Clinical and Radiologic Follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Imbimbo ◽  
Salvatore Alfieri ◽  
Laura Botta ◽  
Cristiana Bergamini ◽  
Annunziata Gloghini ◽  
...  

Objective There is no consensus on the follow-up modalities in patients with head and neck cancer. This study aims to describe the pattern and survival outcomes of recurrences/second primary cancers in patients undergoing an intensive radiologic and clinical follow-up. Study Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Single academic tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods All patients with stage III-IV head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 1998 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Persistent/recurrent disease within 6 months since the curative treatment and second primary cancers outside the upper aerodigestive tract were excluded. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics. Surveillance was planned every 3 months in the first year, then with increasing intervals till the fifth year. Results A total of 326 patients were included. Out of all detected cancer recurrences (n = 106, 32%), 38 (36%) were locoregional, 44 (41%) were distant, and 24 (23%) were second primary cancers. Approximately 70% of recurrences were clinically and/or radiologically discovered, while 30% were diagnosed due to the patients’ symptoms. Of all clinically and/or radiologically discovered recurrences/second primary cancers (n = 74), 26 (35%) were curatively treated, with respect to 9 of the 32 (28%) diagnosed by symptoms. Median overall survival of recurrent curable cases did not significantly differ according to the detection modality (89 months by clinical/radiologic examination vs 85 by symptoms). Conclusions Clinical and radiologic follow-up identified more recurrences/second primary cancers than the symptom-driven monitoring, but the curability of cancer recurrence was similar regardless of detection modality. Prospective trials are needed to define the most effective follow-up strategy in head and neck cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 270 (7) ◽  
pp. 1981-1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Digonnet ◽  
Marc Hamoir ◽  
Guy Andry ◽  
Vincent Vander Poorten ◽  
Missak Haigentz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chi-Chang Chang ◽  
Tse-Hung Huang ◽  
Pei-Wei Shueng ◽  
Ssu-Han Chen ◽  
Chun-Chia Chen ◽  
...  

Despite a considerable expansion in the present therapeutic repertoire for other malignancy managements, mortality from head and neck cancer (HNC) has not significantly improved in recent decades. Moreover, the second primary cancer (SPC) diagnoses increased in patients with HNC, but studies providing evidence to support SPCs prediction in HNC are lacking. Several base classifiers are integrated forming an ensemble meta-classifier using a stacked ensemble method to predict SPCs and find out relevant risk features in patients with HNC. The balanced accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) are over 0.761 and 0.847, with an approximately 2% and 3% increase, respectively, compared to the best individual base classifier. Our study found the top six ensemble risk features, such as body mass index, primary site of HNC, clinical nodal (N) status, primary site surgical margins, sex, and pathologic nodal (N) status. This will help clinicians screen HNC survivors before SPCs occur.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bukola F Adeyemi ◽  
Lola V Adekunle ◽  
Bamidele M Kolude ◽  
Effiong E.U. Akang ◽  
Jonathan O. Lawoyin

2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 576-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kapila Manikantan ◽  
Raghav C Dwivedi ◽  
Suhail I Sayed ◽  
KA Pathak ◽  
Rehan Kazi

Follow-up in head and neck cancer (HNC) is essential to detect and manage locoregional recurrence or metastases, or second primary tumours at the earliest opportunity. A variety of guidelines and investigations have been published in the literature. This has led to oncologists using different guidelines across the globe. The follow-up protocols may have unnecessary investigations that may cause morbidity or discomfort to the patient and may have significant cost implications. In this evidence-based review we have tried to evaluate and address important issues like the frequency of follow-up visits, clinical and imaging strategies adopted, and biochemical methods used for the purpose. This review summarises strategies for follow-up, imaging modalities and key investigations in the literature published between 1980 and 2009. A set of recommendations is also presented for cost-effective, simple yet efficient surveillance in patients with head and neck cancer.


2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 877-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Vitor Martins Priante ◽  
André Lopes Carvalho ◽  
Karina de Cássia Braga Ribeiro ◽  
Hirde Contesini ◽  
Luiz Paulo Kowalski

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the influence of patients lost to follow-up in estimated survival rates calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. STUDY DESIGN: Only patients with previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract were selected. For the patients lost to follow-up anytime, the last medical evaluation date was collected to calculate the “estimate A” survival time. If the same patient returned to our outpatient clinic or further health information was obtained, the updated last information/evaluation date was also collected to calculate “estimate B” survival time. The survival curves considering “estimate A” and “B” survival rates were compared. RESULTS: The overall 5 and 10-years survival rates for all patients calculated for “estimate A” were 54.0% and 46.0%, respectively; compared with 42.8% and 28.2% when were calculated considering “estimate B” ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Close follow-up of the head and neck cancer patients is essential for an accurate estimate of survival by KaplanMeier method. EBM RATING: C


2019 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 109648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Schmidt Jensen ◽  
Christian Grønhøj ◽  
Eva Kristine Ruud Kjær ◽  
Birgitte Wittenborg Charabi ◽  
Christian von Buchwald ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
André Laranja ◽  
Diana Moreira ◽  
Isabel Reis ◽  
Isabel Rodrigues ◽  
Fausto Sousa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document