The theoretical significance of the Latin accusative and infinitive: a reply to Pillinger
Pillinger (1980) argues that the Latin accusative and infinitive construction provides evidence against some of the current assumptions of Relational Grammar (RG) and,1to a lesser extent, the Extended Standard Theory (EST). I argue that, even if one accepts Pillinger's analysis of this construction – as I would, perhaps with less diffidence than Pillinger himself – then this analysis is completely neutral with regard to deciding between RG and EST and compatible with either.
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 3
(152)
◽
pp. 141-145
1994 ◽
Vol 12
(7)
◽
pp. 1174-1184
◽
Keyword(s):
2011 ◽
Vol 211-212
◽
pp. 1096-1099
Keyword(s):