scholarly journals A prospective investigation of plant foods, dietary fibre and ischaemic heart disease in the EPIC cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora Perez-Cornago ◽  
Francesca L. Crowe ◽  
Paul N. Appleby ◽  
Timothy J Key

AbstractIntroductionThere is evidence that plant-based diets might be associated with a lower risk of IHD; however, previous studies have not reported on intake of subtypes of fruit and vegetables and sources of dietary fibre. This study aims to assess the associations of major plant foods, their subtypes and dietary fibre with risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-CVD Consortium.Material and methodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 490,311 men and women in ten European countries without a history of myocardial infarction or stroke at recruitment. Dietary intake was assessed using validated questionnaires and calibrated with 24-hour recall data. Cox regression models, adjusted for IHD risk factors, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsDuring a mean of 12.6 years follow-up, we documented 8504 myocardial infarction cases or deaths from IHD. Participants consuming at least eight portions (80 grams each) of fruits and vegetables a day had a 10% lower risk of IHD (HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.98) compared with those consuming fewer than three portions a day. The risk of IHD was 6% (95% CI 0.90–0.99; P-trend = 0.009) lower for a 200 g/day higher intake of fruit and vegetables combined, 3% (0.95–1.00; P-trend = 0.021) lower for a 100 g/ day higher fruit intake, and 8% (0.86–0.97; P-trend = 0.006) lower for a 50 g/ day higher intake of bananas. Moreover, risk of IHD was 9% (0.83–0.99; P-trend = 0.032) lower for a 10g/ day higher intake of nuts and seeds, and 10% (0.82–0.98; P-trend = 0.020) lower for a 10g/ day higher intake of total dietary fibre. No associations were observed between legumes, total vegetables and other subtypes of fruit and vegetables and IHD risk.DiscussionThe results from this large prospective study suggest that higher intakes of fruit and vegetables combined, total fruit, bananas, nuts and seeds, and total fibre are associated with a lower risk of IHD. Given the observational design of this study, causality and potential mechanisms should be further investigated.

Author(s):  
Aurora Perez-Cornago ◽  
Francesca L Crowe ◽  
Paul N Appleby ◽  
Kathryn E Bradbury ◽  
Angela M Wood ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Epidemiological evidence indicates that diets rich in plant foods are associated with a lower risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), but there is sparse information on fruit and vegetable subtypes and sources of dietary fibre. This study examined the associations of major plant foods, their subtypes and dietary fibre with risk of IHD in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Methods We conducted a prospective analysis of 490 311 men and women without a history of myocardial infarction or stroke at recruitment (12.6 years of follow-up, n cases = 8504), in 10 European countries. Dietary intake was assessed using validated questionnaires, calibrated with 24-h recalls. Multivariable Cox regressions were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of IHD. Results There was a lower risk of IHD with a higher intake of fruit and vegetables combined [HR per 200 g/day higher intake 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90–0.99, P-trend = 0.009], and with total fruits (per 100 g/day 0.97, 0.95–1.00, P-trend = 0.021). There was no evidence for a reduced risk for fruit subtypes, except for bananas. Risk was lower with higher intakes of nuts and seeds (per 10 g/day 0.90, 0.82–0.98, P-trend = 0.020), total fibre (per 10 g/day 0.91, 0.85–0.98, P-trend = 0.015), fruit and vegetable fibre (per 4 g/day 0.95, 0.91–0.99, P-trend = 0.022) and fruit fibre (per 2 g/day 0.97, 0.95–1.00, P-trend = 0.045). No associations were observed between vegetables, vegetables subtypes, legumes, cereals and IHD risk. Conclusions In this large prospective study, we found some small inverse associations between plant foods and IHD risk, with fruit and vegetables combined being the most strongly inversely associated with risk. Whether these small associations are causal remains unclear.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A Barnes ◽  
A Eng ◽  
M Corbin ◽  
H.J Denison ◽  
A t'Mannetje ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction Occupation is a poorly characterised risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), with females and minority populations particularly under-represented in research. There is also a lack of longitudinal studies using detailed health data that does not rely on self-reports. Purpose This study aimed to address these gaps by assessing the association between a range of occupational groups and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in New Zealand (NZ), through linkage of population-based occupational surveys to routinely collected health data. Half of the study population were females and 40% were indigenous Māori (who comprise 15% of the total 4.8 million NZ population), which enabled sex and ethnicity-specific aspects of the relationship between occupation and IHD to be assessed. Methods Two probability-based sample surveys of the NZ adult population (New Zealand Workforce Survey (NZWS); 2004–2006; n=3003) and of the Māori population (NZWS Māori; 2009–2010; n=2107), for which detailed occupational histories and lifestyle factors were collected, were linked with routinely collected health data available through Statistics NZ. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for “ever-worked” in any one of nine major occupational groups, with “never worked” in that occupational group defined as the reference group. Analyses were controlled for age, deprivation and smoking, and stratified by sex and ethnicity. Results The strongest associations were found for “plant/machine operators and assemblers” and “elementary workers”, particularly among female Māori (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.16–4.13 and HR 2.03, 1.07–3.82 respectively). In contrast, inverse associations with IHD across all groups were observed for “technicians and associate professionals”, which was significant for NZWS males (HR 0.52, 0.32–0.84). There were some sex and ethnic differences, particularly for “clerks”, where a positive association was found for NZWS males (HR 1.81, 1.19–2.74), whilst an inverse association was observed for Māori females (HR 0.42, 0.22–0.82). Duration analyses (≤2 years, 2–10 years and 10+ years) showed significant dose-response trends for “clerks” in NZWS males, and “plant/machine operators and assemblers” and “elementary workers” in Māori females. Further adjustments for other potential confounders such diabetes mellitus, hypertension and high cholesterol did not affect the results. Conclusion Associations between occupation and IHD differed significantly across occupational groups and between sexes and ethnicities, even within the same occupational groups. This suggests that results may not be generalised across these groups and occupational interventions to reduce IHD risk may therefore need different approaches depending on the population and specific groups of interest. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand


1967 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 19-20

Complete heart block can occur in ischaemic heart disease, and can acutely complicate myocardial infarction. Most other cases are associated with fibrosis of the bundle of His of unknown cause, or are congenital. In some patients with chronic heart block, especially the congenital type, adequate output is maintained. In other patients chronic or intermittent heart block may cause Stokes-Adams attacks, or heart failure may not respond to digitalis and diuretics until the heart rate is increased. These require treatment by drugs or, when this fails, by use of anartifical pacemaker.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2836-2840
Author(s):  
Martha Gulati

The more atypical presentation of women makes the diagnostic evaluation of symptomatic women challenging and results in more frequent referral for diagnostic testing to improve the precision of the ischaemic heart disease likelihood estimate. The classification of ischaemic heart disease and myocardial infarction has moved beyond the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease and encompasses ischaemia that can occur in the presence and absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Consideration of the different pathophysiology of ischaemia that may occur in women needs to be considered in the evaluation and treatment of ischaemic heart disease in women.


Author(s):  
Bernhard L Gerber ◽  
Mouaz H Al-Mallah ◽  
Joao AC Lima ◽  
Mohammad R Ostovaneh

Chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is one of the most common cardiac conditions worldwide and is generally caused by the consequences of coronary atherosclerosis, including myocardial infarction. Clinical challenges in chronic IHD include detection of myocardial ischaemia in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), evaluation of myocardial viability in patients with established IHD and poor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) when revascularization is considered, as well as risk stratification and identification of patients with chronic IHD at high risk of complications. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide vital answers to all three of these challenges. Stress CMR is now increasingly used to detect ischaemia by means of vasodilator stress perfusion or dobutamine stress contractile reserve stress imaging. For viability assessment, late gadolinium enhancement is currently the method of choice to detect myocardial infarction, and low-dose dobutamine stress magnetic resonance can provide additional information to determine viability and guide therapy. Cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic IHD is mainly determined by left ventricular function, most commonly utilizing LVEF, as well as infarct size, infarct characteristics, and ischaemic burden, which can all be measured reliably with CMR. This chapter will review the role of CMR for the detection of myocardial ischaemia, viability, and risk.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e027199
Author(s):  
Tomas Jernberg ◽  
Daniel Lindholm ◽  
Lars Pål Hasvold ◽  
Bodil Svennblad ◽  
Johan Bodegård ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo compare short-term cardiovascular (CV) outcome in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients without ischaemic heart disease (IHD), with IHD but no prior myocardial infarction (MI), and those with prior MI; and assess the impact on risk of age when initiating first-time glucose-lowering drug (GLD).DesignCohort study linking morbidity, mortality and medication data from Swedish national registries.ParticipantsFirst-time users of GLD during 2007–2016.OutcomesPredicted cumulative incidence for the CV outcome (MI, stroke and CV mortality) was estimated. A Cox model was developed where age at GLD start and CV risk was modelled.Results260 070 first-time GLD users were included, 221 226 (85%) had no IHD, 16 294 (6%) had stable IHD—prior MI and 22 550 (9%) had IHD+MI. T2D patients without IHD had a lower risk of CV outcome compared with the IHD populations (±prior MI), (3-year incidence 4.78% vs 5.85% and 8.04%). The difference in CV outcome was primarily driven by a relative greater MI risk among the IHD patients. For T2D patients without IHD, an almost linear association between age at start of GLD and relative risk was observed, whereas in IHD patients, the younger (<60 years) patients had a relative greater risk compared with older patients.ConclusionsT2D patients without IHD had a lower risk of the CV outcome compared with the T2D populations with IHD, primarily driven by a greater risk of MI. For T2D patients without IHD, an almost linear association between age at start of GLD and relative risk was observed, whereas in IHD patients, the younger patients had a relative greater risk compared with older patients. Our findings suggest that intense risk prevention should be the key strategy in the management of T2D patients, especially for younger patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document