scholarly journals Low prevalence of major depressive disorder in Taiwanese adults: possible explanations and implications

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1227-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.-C. Liao ◽  
W. J. Chen ◽  
M.-B. Lee ◽  
F.-W. Lung ◽  
T.-J. Lai ◽  
...  

BackgroundThis study examined the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), and the correlations and co-morbid conditions associated with MDD, in the adult Taiwanese population, which a previous estimate in the 1980s had found to be at the lower end of the spectrum worldwide. Possible explanations for the reported low prevalence of MDD were evaluated.MethodAs part of a survey of common psychiatric disorders in a nationally representative sample of individuals aged ⩾18 years who were non-institutionalized civilians in Taiwan, a face-to-face interview using the paper version of the World Mental Health Survey of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) was conducted between 2003 and 2005. Functional impairment and help-seeking behaviors were compared between Taiwanese subjects with MDD and their counterparts in the USA.ResultsAmong the 10 135 respondents, the lifetime prevalence of MDD was 1.20% [standard error (s.e.)=0.2%]. Individuals who were divorced or widowed, aged ⩽40 years, and female were at increased risk, whereas rural residents were at lower risk for MDD. The proportion of MDD cases co-morbid with other psychiatric disorders in this study was much lower than in the US study. Only one-third of Taiwanese individuals with MDD sought help despite having twice the number of lost workdays compared with the US sample.ConclusionsDespite the low prevalence of MDD in Taiwanese adults, the pattern of low help-seeking behavior and profound functional impairment indicates much room for improvement in the early detection of and intervention in major depression in this population.

Author(s):  
Marta Ramos ◽  
Cecilia Berrogain ◽  
Julia Concha ◽  
Laura Lomba ◽  
Cristina Belén García ◽  
...  

Abstract The World Health Organization (WHO) predicts that major depressive disorder (MDD) will be the second leading cause of death and disability by 2020. Nowadays, approximately 60–70% of patients with this disorder have shown the lack of effectiveness and tolerability of the therapy with antidepressants. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA) are including pharmacogenetic information in the labeling of several antidepressants. The presence of this information represents the relevance of genetic polymorphisms in drug response. These pharmacogenetic studies have been based on the knowledge of genes involved in pharmacokinetic (


Author(s):  
Andreas Menke

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, serious and in some cases life‐threatening condition and affects approximately 350 million people globally (Otte et al., 2016). The magnitude of the clinical burden reflects the limited effectiveness of current available therapies. The current prescribed antidepressants are based on modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission, i.e. they improve central availability of serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine. However, they are associated with a high rate of partial or non-response, delayed response onset and limited duration. Actually more than 50% of the patients fail to respond to their first antidepressant they receive. Therefore there is a need of new treatment approaches targeting other systems than the monoaminergic pathway. One of the most robust findings in biological psychiatry is a dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in major depression (Holsboer, 2000). Many studies observed an increased production of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the hypothalamus, leading to an increased release of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary and subsequently to an enhanced production of cortisol in the adrenal cortex. Due to an impaired sensitivity of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) the negative feedback mechanisms usually restoring homeostasis after a stress triggered cortisol release are not functioning properly (Holsboer, 2000, Pariante and Miller, 2001). However, treatment strategies targeting the GR or the CRH receptors have not been successful for a general patient population. Selecting the right patients for these treatment alternatives may improve therapy outcome, since a dysregulation of the HPA axis affects only 40-60 % of the depressed patients. Thus, patients with a dysregulated HPA axis have first to be identified and then allocated to a specific treatment regime. Tests like the dexamethasone-suppression-test (DST) or the dex-CRH test have been shown to uncover GR sensitivity deficits, but are not routinely applied in the clinical setting. Recently, the dexamethasone-induced gene expression could uncover GR alterations in participants suffering from major depression and job-related exhaustion (Menke et al., 2012, Menke et al., 2013, Menke et al., 2014, Menke et al., 2016). Actually, by applying the dexamethasone-stimulation test we found a GR hyposensitivity in depressed patients (Menke et al., 2012) and a GR hypersensitivity in subjects with job-related exhaustion (Menke et al., 2014). These alterations normalized after clinical recovery (Menke et al., 2014). Interestingly, the dexamethasone-stimulation test also uncovered FKBP5 genotype dependent alterations in FKBP5 mRNA expression in depressed patients and healthy controls (Menke et al., 2013). FKBP5 is a co-chaperone which modulates the sensitivity of the GR (Binder, 2009). In addition, the dexamethasone-stimulation test provided evidence of common genetic variants that modulate the immediate transcriptional response to GR activation in peripheral human blood cells and increase the risk for depression and co-heritable psychiatric disorders (Arloth et al., 2015). In conclusion, the molecular dexamethasone-stimulation test may thus help to characterize subgroups of subjects suffering from stress-related conditions and in the long-run may be helpful to guide treatment regime as well as prevention strategies.   References: Arloth J, Bogdan R, Weber P, Frishman G, Menke A, Wagner KV, Balsevich G, Schmidt MV, Karbalai N, Czamara D, Altmann A, Trumbach D, Wurst W, Mehta D, Uhr M, Klengel T, Erhardt A, Carey CE, Conley ED, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics C, Ruepp A, Muller-Myhsok B, Hariri AR, Binder EB, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium PGC (2015) Genetic Differences in the Immediate Transcriptome Response to Stress Predict Risk-Related Brain Function and Psychiatric Disorders. Neuron 86:1189-1202. Binder EB (2009) The role of FKBP5, a co-chaperone of the glucocorticoid receptor in the pathogenesis and therapy of affective and anxiety disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34 Suppl 1:S186-195. Holsboer F (2000) The corticosteroid receptor hypothesis of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 23:477-501. Menke A, Arloth J, Best J, Namendorf C, Gerlach T, Czamara D, Lucae S, Dunlop BW, Crowe TM, Garlow SJ, Nemeroff CB, Ritchie JC, Craighead WE, Mayberg HS, Rex-Haffner M, Binder EB, Uhr M (2016) Time-dependent effects of dexamethasone plasma concentrations on glucocorticoid receptor challenge tests. Psychoneuroendocrinology 69:161-171. Menke A, Arloth J, Gerber M, Rex-Haffner M, Uhr M, Holsboer F, Binder EB, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Beck J (2014) Dexamethasone stimulated gene expression in peripheral blood indicates glucocorticoid-receptor hypersensitivity in job-related exhaustion. Psychoneuroendocrinology 44:35-46. Menke A, Arloth J, Putz B, Weber P, Klengel T, Mehta D, Gonik M, Rex-Haffner M, Rubel J, Uhr M, Lucae S, Deussing JM, Muller-Myhsok B, Holsboer F, Binder EB (2012) Dexamethasone Stimulated Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood is a Sensitive Marker for Glucocorticoid Receptor Resistance in Depressed Patients. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:1455-1464. Menke A, Klengel T, Rubel J, Bruckl T, Pfister H, Lucae S, Uhr M, Holsboer F, Binder EB (2013) Genetic variation in FKBP5 associated with the extent of stress hormone dysregulation in major depression. Genes Brain Behav  12:289-296. Otte C, Gold SM, Penninx BW, Pariante CM, Etkin A, Fava M, Mohr DC, Schatzberg AF (2016) Major depressive disorder. Nature reviews Disease primers 2:16065. Pariante CM, Miller AH (2001) Glucocorticoid receptors in major depression: relevance to pathophysiology and treatment. Biological psychiatry 49:391-404.


1996 ◽  
Vol 168 (S30) ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Kessler ◽  
C. B. Nelson ◽  
K. A. McGonagle ◽  
J. Liu ◽  
M. Swartz ◽  
...  

General population data are presented on the prevalence and correlates of comorbidity between DSM–III–R major depressive disorder (MDD) and other DSM–III–R disorders. The data come from the US National Comorbidity Survey, a large general population survey of persons aged 15–54 years in the non-institutionalised civilian population. Diagnoses are based on a modified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The analysis shows that most cases of lifetime MDD are secondary, in the sense that they occur in people with a prior history of another DSM–III–R disorder. Anxiety disorders are the most common primary disorders. The time-lagged effects of most primary disorders on the risk of subsequent MDD continue for many years without change in magnitude. Secondary MDD is, in general, more persistent and severe than pure or primary MDD. This has special public health significance because lifetime prevalence of secondary MDD has increased in recent cohorts, while the prevalence of pure and primary depression has remained unchanged.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 333-333
Author(s):  
M.L. Perereira ◽  
D.L. Nunes Peçanha ◽  
I.A. Santos Bordin

IntroductionPsychiatric disorders occur in a complex context of human relations in its social and psychological aspects. Family functioning is closely related to physical and psychological well-being of family members and its impairment affects the family as a whole.ObjectivesTo evaluate family functioning in two groups of adolescents (13–18 years): cases (with major depressive disorder) and controls (with no DSM-IV psychiatric disorders based on the Brazilian version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children-Present and Lifetime/K-SADS-PL).MethodFamilies of cases (N = 9) and controls (N = 9) were matched by adolescent's age, gender and education, number and age of siblings, parental marital status and occupational activity, and family income. An experienced systemic family therapist applied the Structured Family Interview to each family. Nine dimensions of family functioning were evaluated: communication, rules, roles, leadership, conflict, aggressiveness, affect, individuation and integration. Session transcripts were independently evaluated by two other systemic family therapists blind to the family case-control category.ResultsRaters scored all interview items using a standardized coding system (overall agreement = 83.5%). Cases exhibited lower mean scores in seven family dimensions, specially affect (p = 0.0078). Differences were not found regarding rules and leadership.ConclusionDifficulty in expressing affect in parent-child relationships was the main characteristic of families with a depressive adolescent. Improvement of family functioning can contribute to minimize the negative influence of psychosocial and family factors on the reoccurrence, and severity of depressive episodes among depressed adolescents.


2010 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. S70-S71
Author(s):  
L.A. Batten⁎ ◽  
P. Wickramartne ◽  
M.A. Goldmann-Alvarez ◽  
D.J. Pilowsky ◽  
M. Flament ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document