Impossible Knowledge and Belief in God

1974 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Langford

In ‘The Turning Point in Philosophy’ Moritz Schlick expressed the following view: ‘Everything is knowable which can be expressed, and this is the total subject matter concerning which meaningful questions can be raised. There are consequently no questions which are in principle unanswerable, no problems which are in principle insoluble.’ (page 56 in Logical Positivism edited by A. J. Ayer.) I will refer to this as Schlick's principle, although it is shared by many others. What it amounts to is the view that all meaningful questions can be answered by rational procedures, that is by logical argument or appeal to evidence. It is this view which I wish to challenge, at the same time relating what I have to say to belief in God. For it follows from Schlick's principle that provided the question ‘Does God exist?’ can be meaningfully asked, it is in principle possible to answer it either affirmatively or negatively. Having done so, we would then know, and not merely believe, that God does or does not exist. I will try to show that provided the question ‘Does God exist?’ can be meaningfully asked, no such consequence need be taken to follow.

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-94
Author(s):  
A. Subetto

The article contains the main subject-matter of the scientific report «Noospheric Paradigm of the Strategy of the Rising Reproduction of the Population of Russia» delivered by the author at the sitting of the Academic Council of the Institute of the Socioeconomic Problems of Population, RAS, on 6 February 2018. The author stresses that Russia and humankind entered the Era of Great Evolution Turning Point on the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries which requires revising the bases of both modern scientific world outlook and formed institutes and mechanisms of socioeconomic development, those supporting the progressive development of reproductive health of nation, in particular. The formed imperative of surviving is the synthesis of the noosphere and socialist imperatives. Hence- the main provisions of the noospheric strategy of the rising reproduction of the Russian population


2011 ◽  
pp. 293-311
Author(s):  
Atila Dudas

Apart from previous partial codifications and system-laws, the first civil code in Hungary was promulgated in 1959. After the beginning of transition in 1989, despite the great number of amendments to the existing Civil code, to issue of recodification of civil law in Hungary became inevitable. This process began in 1998 when the Government appointed a committee with most renowned Hungarian legal scholars as members, which had the task to prepare a draft version of a new civil code. The committee has worked devotedly on the text of the draft for nearly a decade. In 2003 it published the so-called Concept and Syllabus of the new civil code in order to enable the public to get knowledge of the planned subject matter of the draft and, what is even more important, enable it to contribute to the quality of the draft by expressing critical remarks and suggestions. The committee, having taken into account the opinion of the public, continued its work on the draft and published the first full text of the draft in 2006. 2007 marked a turning point in the codification procedure when, to general astonishment, the Ministry of Justice took over the task of drafting a civil code, by which the drafting committee's mandate on the preparation of the new civil code ceased to exist, before it even could have had a chance to process the remarks the public had had on the 2006 draft. The Ministry published its first version of the draft in 2007, and a second one in 2008. In the same year, the committee, whose mandate has ceased to exist in 2007, published its, by then unofficial, version of the draft in order to make the achievements of its nearly decade-long work available to public in authentic form. The Ministry's second draft was adopted in 2008 by the Government and submitted to the Parliament as a bill to be enacted. The Parliament, after it had been in legislative procedure for a year or so, finally adopted the new Civil code of Hungary, though with a very slim majority. However, the President, using his constitutional powers, denied promulgating it, just as the subsequently enacted Law on the Implementation and Entering into Force of the new Civil Code. The President, who is, by the way, one of the most prominent civil law scholars in Hungary, expressed his deepest doubts in respect of the enactment of the new Civil code, both in terms of its substantial flaws and the manner in which the legislative draft and bill have been prepared. Using his right to suspensive veto he could not bring to naught the new Civil code, but he succeeded in postponing its promulgation and entry into force. The aim of this paper is to block in the tempestuous, decade-long work on the text of the new Civil code and its content in short, with special regard to the reasons for which the President denied to promulgate it.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-58
Author(s):  
Laksana Arum Nugraheni

Abstract Every citizen has the right to protection against discriminatory treatment. The state guarantees the freedom of each of its inhabitants to embrace their respective religions and to worship according to their religion and belief. The rights of adherents of belief or what is known as the Belief in God Almighty by law in Indonesia have not been fully accommodated and discrimination is still found in social life. The author examines marriage registration from a philosophical point of view based on the values ​​of Pancasila and statutory regulations for Believers. This type of research is a juridical normative that uses a conceptual approach, laws, history and cases. The author analyzes with qualitative methods and deductive thinking methods. The results show that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97 / PUU-XVI / 2016 is a manifestation of the values ​​in the principles of Pancasila so that it is in line with the goals and ideals of the nation which make Pancasila the guide for the nation's life. The decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97 / PUU-XIV / 2016 is a turning point that provides space for citizens, especially Believers to obtain administrative constitutional rights for inhabitants. Apart from being determined by the teachings of their belief, the validity of marriages must also be carried out in the presence of a Leader of Beliefs in accordance with statutory regulations. Marriages that are not recorded do not fulfill the administrative aspects or formal requirements for the validity of the marriage so that the implication is that the marriage is not legally binding. Keywords : Marriage, Believers in God Almighty, Pancasila   Abstrak Setiap warga negara berhak mendapatkan perlindungan terhadap perlakuan yang bersifat diskriminatif. Negara menjamin kemerdekaan tiap-tiap penduduknya untuk memeluk agamanya masing-masing dan untuk beribadat menurut agamanya dan kepercayaannya itu. Hak bagi pemeluk aliran kepercayaan atau yang disebut dengan Penghayat Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa secara hukum di Indonesia belum terakomodasi sepenuhnya dan masih ditemukan diskriminasi dalam kehidupan sosial kemasyarakatan. Penulis mengkaji pencatatan perkawinan dari sudut pandang filosofis berdasarkan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan peraturan perundang-undangan bagi Penghayat Kepercayaan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan konseptual, undang-undang, sejarah dan kasus. Penulis menganalisa dengan metode kualitatif dan metode berpikir deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XVI/2016 merupakan perwujudan dari nilai dalam sila-sila Pancasila sehingga sejalan dengan tujuan dan cita-cita bangsa yang menjadikan Pancasila sebagai pedoman hidup bangsa. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016 merupakan titik balik yang memberikan ruang bagi warga negara khususnya Penghayat Kepercayaan untuk memperoleh hak konstitusional administratif kependudukan. Keabsahan perkawinan Penghayat Kepercayaan selain ditentukan oleh ajaran kepercayaannya, juga harus dilaksanakan di hadapan Pemuka Penghayat Kepercayaan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan maka tidak memenuhi aspek administratif atau syarat formil sahnya perkawinan sehingga berimplikasi pada perkawinan tersebut tidak berkekuatan hukum. Kata Kunci : Perkawinan, Penghayat Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa, Pancasila


PMLA ◽  
1935 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1320-1327
Author(s):  
Colbert Searles

THE germ of that which follows came into being many years ago in the days of my youth as a university instructor and assistant professor. It was generated by the then quite outspoken attitude of colleagues in the “exact sciences”; the sciences of which the subject-matter can be exactly weighed and measured and the force of its movements mathematically demonstrated. They assured us that the study of languages and literature had little or nothing scientific about it because: “It had no domain of concrete fact in which to work.” Ergo, the scientific spirit was theirs by a stroke of “efficacious grace” as it were. Ours was at best only a kind of “sufficient grace,” pleasant and even necessary to have, but which could, by no means ensure a reception among the elected.


1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 833-833
Author(s):  
No authorship indicated
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shonna D. Waters ◽  
Richard N. Landers ◽  
Nicholas Brenckman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document