SERTIFIKASI HAKIM LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN IMPLIKASINYA BAGI EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN INDONESIA

The judiciary body is at the forefront of enforcing Indonesian environmental law through judges' decisions that prioritize the preservation of environmental functions. Judges who have competence in the field of environmental law are expected to be able to make decisions in favor of environmental justice. However, the reality is that there are still many judges' decisions on environmental cases that are not in favor of justice and the interests of the preservation of environmental functions. The existence of Supreme Court Decree Number 134 / KMA / SK / IX / 2011 concerning Certification of Environmental Judges is also considered not optimal in increasing the competence of judges regarding environmental cases decision. This study is to identify, analyze, and explain the implications of environmental judge certification for the effectiveness of Indonesian environmental law enforcement. The type of research used is juridical normative or doctrinal, using secondary data sources which include primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research concludes that environmental judge certification is literally becoming an important and strategic aspect in the effort to bring the effectiveness of environmental law enforcement in Indonesia into reality. Up to now, the regulation of environmental judge certification has not been fully optimally implemented. This research considers that it is important to carry out legal reconstruction, in order to obtain an ideal concept related to environmental judge certification in an effort to have a solid and effective Indonesian environmental law enforcement. Keywords: judge certification, environment, law enforcement.

Penyelesaian Sengketea Tripartit Dalam Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Pada Perusahaan alih Daya dilihat dari UU 30 Tahun 1999

Industrial Relations Disputes are part of the employment relationship that aims to find solutions to disputes between workers and employers. Industrial relations disputes also occur in outsourcing companies, whether they are resolved bipartitely, tripartitely or through the industrial relations court. In principle, the tripartite dispute resolution is expected to optimize out-of-court dispute resolution for industrial relations disputes, but in reality the tripartite settlement is not considered optimal. This paper is intended to discuss normative juridical issues of dispute resolution at the tripartite level in outsourcing companies, supported by field data from the South Tangerang Manpower Office as supporting data. This data certainly cannot represent the same conditions for similar disputes in the territory the Republic of Indonesia, but it is hoped that it can contribute ideas to the implementation of tripartite industrial relations dispute resolution in outsourcing companies. Based on the normative juridical study, there are not many legal aspects that can examine the challenges of tripartite industrial relations dispute resolution in outsourcing companies, as seen from Law no. 30 of 1999, but with supporting data, the potential obstacles can at least be described from the data obtained at the Tangerang Manpower Office, so that development efforts are needed so that the settlement of industrial relations disputes in general and in outsourcing companies can be carried out more optimally. Abstrak Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial merupakan bagian dari hubungan ketenagakerjaan yang bertujuan untuk mencari solusi terhadap perselisihan antara pekerja dengan pemberi kerja. Permasalahan perselisihan hubungan industrial juga terjadi pada perusahaan alih daya baik yang diselesaikan secara bipartit, tripartit maupun melalui pengadilan hubungan industrial. Penyelesaian Sengketa secara tripartit pada prinsipnya diharapkan dapat mengoptimalkan penyelesaian sengketa diluar pengadilan bagi sengketa hubungan industrial namun kenyataannya penyelesaian secara tripartit dirasakan belum cukup optimal. Tulisan ini ditujukan untuk membahas secara yuridis normatif permasalaha penyelesaian sengketa pada tingkatan tripartit pada perusahaan alih daya dengan didukung data lapangan dari dinas tenaga kerja Tangerang Selatan sebagai suatu data pendukung. Data ini tentu tidak dapat mewakili kondisi yang sama untuk sengketa sejenis di wilayah Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, namun diharapkan dapat memberikan sumbangan pemikiran terhadap pelaksanaan penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial secara tripartit pada perusahaan alih daya. Berdasarkan Kajian Yuridis Normatif tidak banyak aspek hukum yang dapat menelaahan tantangan penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial secara tripartit pada perusahaan alih daya dilihat dari UU No. 30 Tahun 1999, namun dengan adanya data pendukung, maka potensi kendala setidaknya dapat diuraikan dari data yang diperoleh pada Dina Tenaga Kerja Tangerang, sehingga diperlukan upaya pengembangan agar penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial pada umumnya maupun pada perusahaan alih daya dapat terselenggara secara lebih optimal.

SEBUAH TELAAH ATAS REGULASI DAN PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI INDONESIA DALAM PARADIGMA SUPPORTED DECISION MAKING

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata regulates that an adult, who is in a continuous state of simple-mindedness, insanity or rage, shall be placed under conservatorship, notwithstanding that he might have mental capacity from time to time (mental disabilities). Similiar to that, Undang-Undang Penyandang Disabilitas regulates that people with disabilities can be declared as incapable of the law and placed under conservatorship by court judgment. The consequence of that conservatorship is an individual placed in conservatorship has no legal capacity and prohibited to do any legal action by themself. The perspective that be used in that two regulations and some court judgments in giving conservatorship is substituted decision making which the conservator substitutes the position of an individual placed in conservatorship. This concept actually is no longer appropriate with the new paradigm brought by CRPD, supported decision making. This issue makes the researcher did a normative research by using some secondary data as regulations and also some conservatorship court judgment. Based on the research, the researcher found that the regulations and some conservatorship court judgment do not support the efforts to fulfill the rights of person with disabilities to got an equality before the law especially to make any decisions.

ANALISIS PEMBUBARAN ORGANISASI KEMASYARAKATAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF ASAS CONTARIUS ACTUS DALAM NEGARA HUKUM

Abstrak Pemerintah mempunyai hak mutlak di dalam membubarkan Organisasi kemasyarakatan setelah di sahkannya Peraturan pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang No 2 Tahun 2017 menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2017 Tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatann, hal ini jelas tidak mencerminkan prinsip dari sebuah negara yang mengeklaim dirinya sebagai Negara yang menjunjung supremasi hukum, dimana ciri-ciri dari Negara hukum itu menjunjung tinggi tentang hak asasi manusia dan pembagian kekuasaan. Argumentasi penggunaan asas contarius Actus sebagai alasan mendesak untuk membentuk suatu Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang Undang yang kemudian di sahkan menjadi Undang Undang memberikan batasan terhadap kemerdekaan berserikat yang di jamin oleh Pasal 28 dan Pasal 28J Undang-Undang Dasar tahun 1945. Berdasarkan Undang Undang Dasar Tahun 1945, sistem check and balances (pengawasan dan keseimbangan) sangat penting di tekankan di dalam pembagian kekuasaan yang jelas antara fungsi Eksekutif dan yudikatif. Artinya, di dalam pembubaran sebuah organisasi haruslah melibatkan pengadilan dengan cara melakukan penataan penyelesaian asas peradilan yang cepat, sederhana dan dengan biaya ringan sehingga proses penyelesaian sebuah masalah bisa di laksanakan secara singkat dan cepat. Kata Kunci : Organisasi kemasyarakatan, Negara Hukum, Kekuasaan Abstract The government has an absolute right in disbanding the Community Organization after the enactment of the Government Regulation Replacement Law No. 2 of 2017 into Law No. 16 of 2017 on Community Organizations, this clearly does not reflect the principle of a country that claims itself as a State that upholds the supremacy of the law, where the characteristics of the State law upholds human rights and the division of power. The argument of the use of the principle of contarius Actus as an urgent reason to form a Government Regulation Replacement Law which is then authorized into law provides limits on the freedom of association guaranteed by Article 28 and Article 28J of the Constitution of 1945. Based on the 1945 Constitution, the system of check and balances is very important in the clear division of power between the Executive and judicial functions. That is, in the dissolution of an organization must involve the court by structuring the settlement of judicial principles quickly, simply and at a small cost so that the process of solving a problem can be carried out briefly and quickly. Keywords: Community Organization, State of Law, Power

The Moral Reading of HIV Prevention in the United States: Criminal Law and Tort Law

The United States government has been campaigning to encourage people to take HIV testing and thus get treated. It is puzzling that more than 50% of States have HIV-specific criminal laws that criminalize both exposure and transmission. At the same time, there is an increased tort law to seek financial compensation for unwanted HIV exposure and transmission. While both laws the moral claim of protecting people from HIV infection, this paper is trying to find an answer to the following inquiry: What is the difference of the moral reading between the use of criminal law and tort law in addressing HIV prevention in the United States? This paper uses the traditional descriptive comparison between criminal law and tort law under the American legal system with a nationwide jurisdictional scope. This paper measures the difference using the frame of reference of Ronald Dworkin's law, morality, and interpretation theory. Both criminal law and tort law have been developing similar liability principles regarding HIV exposure and transmission under the United States' common law tradition. For HIV prevention itself, both criminal law and tort law play a marginal role in gaining public health purposes in reversing the HIV epidemic. Criminal law has been scrutinized as not aligned with the purpose of law where misconceptions exist in both substantive dimension and the underlying moral claim. Tort law, on the other hand, suffers an even less moral claim on public health purposes. However, tort law maintains a consistent narrow sense of financial liability.

ASPEK HUKUM PENGELOLAAN LIMBAH MEDIS PADA FASILITAS PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN

Hazardous and Toxic Waste/ (Hazardous and Toxic Materials) is the residue of a business and/or activity containing hazardous and toxic materials (B3). One of the B3 wastes is medical waste, which is an infectious waste generated from activities at health care facilities, in the form of solid or liquid waste. These medical wastes are generated from activities such as hospitals, community health centres, independent practice places, clinics, etc. Amenities. Medical waste is an infectious object or item that must be properly managed, starting from the time of collection, transportation, to the destruction process. Therefore, it is necessary to have legally binding regulations related to waste and its management. This research is descriptive in nature which will produce a regulatory description of B3 waste management, particularly medical waste with the protection of environmental health rights. The research approach used normative legal approach. The data collected is in the form of secondary data, while the method of analysis used is qualitative analysis methods. The results showed that the more human activity increased, the more waste was generated. Medical waste is one of the B3 wastes. Medical waste is waste that is directly generated from the diagnosis and medical treatment of patients in health care facilities, such as in polyclinic, nursing, surgical, obstetrics, autopsy and laboratory rooms. To avoid environmental risks, medical waste management must be carried out properly. Various laws and regulations for the management of B3 waste have been enacted, including Government Regulation No. 19/1994 (PP 19/1994) concerning Management of Hazardous and Toxic Wastes up to PP 101/2014. The provisions regarding B3 waste management are based on Law Number 32 the Year 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management (UUPLH). However, related to medical waste, it still needs to be synchronized with the regulations in Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health. Regulations on medical waste management aim to protect environmental health. Medical waste management can prevent environmental pollution and prevent disease transmission (infection) and prevent waste misuse.

YURIDIKSI PENGADILAN DAN ARBITRASE DALAM MEMERIKSA SUATU SENGKETA DIKAITKAN DENGAN PRINSIP COMPETENCE -COMPETENCE DAN KLAUSUL ARBITRASE

The doctrine of the principle of competence explains that arbitration which has jurisdiction in the statement itself is based on the authority to hear and decide an arbitration dispute. The authority possessed by Arbitration even though there is an arbitration clause in a belief as a way of resolving disputes arising in the agreement. The determination of the arbitration authority is related to the validity of an arbitration clause or their agreement arbitration agreement which makes the agreement in question regarding this matter The legal problems in this research relate to the norm vacancies regarding the competence-competence principle in Law No. 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (hereinafter abbreviated as AAPS Law).Solving research problems using normative legal methods with a legal approach, cases, and analysis of legal concepts.

TINJAUAN HUKUM TERKAIT PERLINDUNGAN PENYU HIJAU SEBAGAI SATWA YANG DI LINDUNGI DALAM KASUS PERDAGANGAN PENYU ILEGAL DI JEMBRANA

Indonesia merupakan negara yang memiliki daftar panjang tentang satwa liar terancam punah, maraknya satwa yang diseludupkan ke berbagai tempat dengan berbagai macam tujuan menjadi hal yang sangat perlu di awasi, salah satunya adalah perdagangan penyu hijau (Chelonia mydas) di Jembrana. Perlindungan penyu hijau sudah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1990 dan secara Internasional telah masuk dalam Appendix 1 CITES. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian yuridis normatif, dengan teknik studi dokumen dan wawancara dalam teknik pengumpulan data dan mempergunakan metode analisis data kualitatif. Bedasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui kasus perdagangan yang terjadi di Jembrana bukan termasuk perdagangan ekspor impor maka upaya hukum belum dapat menggunakan ketentuan CITES dan WTO, namun terkait dengan upaya penegakan hukum dan penyelesaian kasus perdagangan Penyu Hijau di lakukan sesuai dengan UU nomor 5 tahun 1990, PP No. 7 Tahun 1999 dan Permen LHK No. P.106/2018 dengan tetap berlatar konvensi CITES. Upaya Perlindungan Penyu dalam Perdagangan dapat dilaksankaan dengan pemahaman terhadap subtansi hukum, saling terhubungnya komunikasi para subjek hukum dan pengawsan serta evaluasi dari kelembagaan.

PERSPEKTIF RUU CIPTA KERJA DITINJAU BERDASARKAN UUD 1945

Pembentukan RUU Cipta Kerja perlu di hargai karena memiliki spirit yang bagus, paling tidak untuk memudahkan investasi, membuka lapangan kerja, memangkas berbagai peraturan yang berbelit-belit dan untuk negara kesejahteraan. Tetapi jangan sampai menabrak Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Politik hukumnya harus dalam kerangka kepentingan masyarakat. Seperti kata Cicero keselamatan rakyat adalah hukum yang tertinggi. Negara demokrasi, supremasi hukum dan pengawasan haruslah menjadi perhatian. Jadi jangan salah jalan. Kita tidak juga ingin berkurangnya kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap pemerintah. Jika juga terjadi pengundangan sebaiknya undang-undang itu dicabut melalui Perpu atau setidak-tidaknya di tunda pemberlakukannya. Karena kita tidak ingin terjadi pembangkangan publik terhadap berlakunya undang-undang itu. Pemerintah harus arif dan bijak menyikapi keinginan rakyat agar ketertiban, keamanan dan stabilitas nasional tetap terkendali.