The direct determination of magnetic domain wall profiles using a split detector STEM

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 466-467
Author(s):  
J.N. Chapman ◽  
P.E. Batson ◽  
E.M. Waddell ◽  
R.P. Ferrier
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Domain Wall ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Domain Walls ◽  
Photographic Plate ◽  
Magnetic Domain ◽  
Direct Determination ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron

By far the most commonly used mode of Lorentz microscopy in the examination of ferromagnetic thin films is the Fresnel or defocus mode. Use of this mode in the conventional transmission electron microscope (CTEM) is straightforward and immediately reveals the existence of all domain walls present. However, if such quantitative information as the domain wall profile is required, the technique suffers from several disadvantages. These include the inability to directly observe fine image detail on the viewing screen because of the stringent illumination coherence requirements, the difficulty of accurately translating part of a photographic plate into quantitative electron intensity data, and, perhaps most severe, the difficulty of interpreting this data. One solution to the first-named problem is to use a CTEM equipped with a field emission gun (FEG) (Inoue, Harada and Yamamoto 1977) whilst a second is to use the equivalent mode of image formation in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) (Chapman, Batson, Waddell, Ferrier and Craven 1977), a technique which largely overcomes the second-named problem as well.

Position of Histone Pairs: H3, H4 and H2A, H2B Within the Nucleosome

1981 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 444-445
Author(s):  
C. Stoeckert ◽  
M. Beer ◽  
J.W. Wiggins ◽  
R.P. Hjelm
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
Direct Determination ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Step Procedure ◽  
Scanning Transmission

The genetic material of eukaryotes is organized into nucleosomes. These consist of 145 base pairs of DNA and 2 each of the histone proteins: H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. Studies by Finch et al (1977) and Dubochet et al (1978) indicate that the shape of the nucleosome is a flat cylinder with a diameter of 110Å and a height of 55Å. Models based on histone-DNA and histone-histone cross-linking have been proposed by Klug et al (1980) and Carter et al (1980). Here we report a direct determination using the Johns Hopkins scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) (Wiggins et al, 1979).In order to identify a histone, it was labeled with several platinum atoms in a two-step procedure. The first is modification of the histone lysines with methyl (methyl-thio-acetimidate). This reaction was done on 0.3 mgs/ml in nucleosome protein in 0.6 M NaCl, 20mM Na borate pH 9.4. An imidate conc. of 40mM modifies about 50-60% of the lysines. The result is to provide thioether groups for subsequent platinum binding.

A General Method for Spectrometer Design in the Scoff Approximation

1976 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 538-539
Author(s):  
J. R. Fields
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Energy Analysis ◽  
Incident Beam ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Chemical Identification ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Transmission ◽  
General Method

The energy analysis of electrons scattered by a specimen in a scanning transmission electron microscope can improve contrast as well as aid in chemical identification. In so far as energy analysis is useful, one would like to be able to design a spectrometer which is tailored to his particular needs. In our own case, we require a spectrometer which will accept a parallel incident beam and which will focus the electrons in both the median and perpendicular planes. In addition, since we intend to follow the spectrometer by a detector array rather than a single energy selecting slit, we need as great a dispersion as possible. Therefore, we would like to follow our spectrometer by a magnifying lens. Consequently, the line along which electrons of varying energy are dispersed must be normal to the direction of the central ray at the spectrometer exit.

Resolution in the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope

1972 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 454-455
Author(s):  
M. G. R. Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Spherical Aberration ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Dark Field ◽  
Objective Lens ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Transmission

The variation of contrast and signal to noise ratio with change in detector solid angle in the high resolution scanning transmission electron microscope was discussed in an earlier paper. In that paper the conclusions were that the most favourable conditions for the imaging of isolated single heavy atoms were, using the notation in figure 1, either bright field phase contrast with β0⋍0.5 α0, or dark field with an annular detector subtending an angle between ao and effectively π/2.The microscope is represented simply by the model illustrated in figure 1, and the objective lens is characterised by its coefficient of spherical aberration Cs. All the results for the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM) may with care be applied to the Conventional Electron Microscope (CEM). The object atom is represented as detailed in reference 2, except that ϕ(θ) is taken to be the constant ϕ(0) to simplify the integration. This is reasonable for θ ≤ 0.1 θ0, where 60 is the screening angle.

Comparison of Techniques for EELS Mapping in Biology

1996 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 300-301
Author(s):  
R.D. Leapman ◽  
S.B. Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Image Data ◽  
Beam Current ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
Acquisition Time ◽  
Uniform Thickness ◽  
Electron Dose ◽  
Array Detectors ◽  
Transmission Electron

Elemental mapping of biological specimens by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) can be carried out both in the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), and in the energy-filtering transmission electron microscope (EFTEM). Choosing between these two approaches is complicated by the variety of specimens that are encountered (e.g., cells or macromolecules; cryosections, plastic sections or thin films) and by the range of elemental concentrations that occur (from a few percent down to a few parts per million). Our aim here is to consider the strengths of each technique for determining elemental distributions in these different types of specimen.On one hand, it is desirable to collect a parallel EELS spectrum at each point in the specimen using the ‘spectrum-imaging’ technique in the STEM. This minimizes the electron dose and retains as much quantitative information as possible about the inelastic scattering processes in the specimen. On the other hand, collection times in the STEM are often limited by the detector read-out and by available probe current. For example, a 256 x 256 pixel image in the STEM takes at least 30 minutes to acquire with read-out time of 25 ms. The EFTEM is able to collect parallel image data using slow-scan CCD array detectors from as many as 1024 x 1024 pixels with integration times of a few seconds. Furthermore, the EFTEM has an available beam current in the µA range compared with just a few nA in the STEM. Indeed, for some applications this can result in a factor of ~100 shorter acquisition time for the EFTEM relative to the STEM. However, the EFTEM provides much less spectral information, so that the technique of choice ultimately depends on requirements for processing the spectrum at each pixel (viz., isolated edges vs. overlapping edges, uniform thickness vs. non-uniform thickness, molar vs. millimolar concentrations).

Measurement of lattice parameter at the nanometer scale using convergent-beam microdiffraction from a thermal emission source

1993 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 690-691
Author(s):  
W. T. Pike
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Thermal Emission ◽  
Lattice Parameter ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Emission Source ◽  
Device Structure ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Transmission ◽  
Convergent Beam

With the advent of crystal growth techniques which enable device structure control at the atomic level has arrived a need to determine the crystal structure at a commensurate scale. In particular, in epitaxial lattice mismatched multilayers, it is of prime importance to know the lattice parameter, and hence strain, in individual layers in order to explain the novel electronic behavior of such structures. In this work higher order Laue zone (holz) lines in the convergent beam microdiffraction patterns from a thermal emission transmission electron microscope (TEM) have been used to measure lattice parameters to an accuracy of a few parts in a thousand from nanometer areas of material.Although the use of CBM to measure strain using a dedicated field emission scanning transmission electron microscope has already been demonstrated, the recording of the diffraction pattern at the required resolution involves specialized instrumentation. In this work, a Topcon 002B TEM with a thermal emission source with condenser-objective (CO) electron optics is used.

Development of Line Analysis and Real-Time Elemental Mapping System in Stem Equipped with a Two-Window Energy Filter

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1134-1135
Author(s):  
K. Kaji ◽  
T. Aoyama ◽  
S. Taya ◽  
S. Isakozawa
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Elemental Mapping ◽  
Additional Function ◽  
Edge Structure ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Mapping System ◽  
Scanning Transmission

The ability to obtain elemental maps processed by using inelastically scattered electrons in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) or a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) is extremely useful in the analysis of materials, and semiconductor devices such as ULSI’s and GMR heads. Electron energy loss spectra (EELS) also give useful information not only to identify unknown materials but also to study chemical bonding states of the objective atoms. Hitachi developed an elemental mapping system, consisting of a STEM (Hitachi, HD- 2000) equipped with a two-window energy filter (Hitachi, ELV-2000), and performed realtime conventional jump-ratio images with nanometer resolution by in-situ calculation of energy-filtered signals [1]. Additional function of acquiring EELS along any lines on specimen has been developed in this system to investigate the energy loss near edge structure (ELNES).Figure 1 shows a schematic figure of the two-window energy filter, consisting of two quadrupole lenses for focusing and zooming spectra, respectively, a magnetic prism spectrometer, a deflection coil and two kinds of electron beam detectors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document