scholarly journals Transition from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy: comparing two preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies strategies

Zygote ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lluc Coll ◽  
Mònica Parriego ◽  
Montserrat Boada ◽  
Marta Devesa ◽  
Gemma Arroyo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Single Cell Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
Trophectoderm Biopsy ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
New Strategy

SummaryShortly after the implementation of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), the discussion about the transition from day 3 to blastocyst stage biopsy was initiated. Trophectoderm biopsy with CCS is meant to overcome the limitations of cleavage-stage biopsy and single-cell analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the results obtained in our PGT-A programme after the implementation of this new strategy. Comparisons between the results obtained in 179 PGT-A cycles with day 3 biopsy (D+3) and fresh embryo transfer, and 204 cycles with trophectoderm biopsy and deferred (frozen–thawed) embryo transfer were established. Fewer embryos were biopsied and a higher euploidy rate was observed in the trophectoderm biopsy group. No differences in implantation (50.3% vs. 61.4%) and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (56.1% vs. 65.3%) were found. Although the mean number of euploid embryos per cycle did not differ between groups (1.5 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8), the final number of euploid blastocysts available for transfer per cycle was significantly higher in the trophectoderm biopsy group (1.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8). This factor led to an increased cumulative live birth rate in this last group (34.1% vs. 44.6%). Although both strategies can offer good results, trophectoderm biopsy offers a more robust diagnosis and the intervention is less harmful for the embryos so more euploid blastocysts are finally available for transfer and/or vitrification.

scholarly journals Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e042395
Author(s):  
Simone Cornelisse ◽  
Liliana Ramos ◽  
Brigitte Arends ◽  
Janneke J Brink-van der Vlugt ◽  
Jan Peter de Bruin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Oocyte Retrieval ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
Cleavage Stage ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Superiority Trial

IntroductionIn vitro fertilisation (IVF) has evolved as an intervention of choice to help couples with infertility to conceive. In the last decade, a strategy change in the day of embryo transfer has been developed. Many IVF centres choose nowadays to transfer at later stages of embryo development, for example, transferring embryos at blastocyst stage instead of cleavage stage. However, it still is not known which embryo transfer policy in IVF is more efficient in terms of cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), following a fresh and the subsequent frozen–thawed transfers after one oocyte retrieval. Furthermore, studies reporting on obstetric and neonatal outcomes from both transfer policies are limited.Methods and analysisWe have set up a multicentre randomised superiority trial in the Netherlands, named the Three or Fivetrial. We plan to include 1200 women with an indication for IVF with at least four embryos available on day 2 after the oocyte retrieval. Women are randomly allocated to either (1) control group: embryo transfer on day 3 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 3 or 4, or (2) intervention group: embryo transfer on day 5 and cryopreservation of supernumerary good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6. The primary outcome is the cLBR per oocyte retrieval. Secondary outcomes include LBR following fresh transfer, multiple pregnancy rate and time until pregnancy leading a live birth. We will also assess the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, costs and patients’ treatment burden.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands in June 2018 (CCMO NL 64060.000.18). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed and in open access journals.Trial registration numberNetherlands Trial Register (NL 6857).

scholarly journals 172ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER (ESET) IN HUMANS DOES NOT AFFECT THE CHANCES OF A SUCCESSFUL PREGNANCY

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
J. Catt ◽  
T. Wood ◽  
M. Henman ◽  
R. Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Single Embryo Transfer ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Transfer Group

Improvements in human IVF have led to increased pregnancy rates but at the expense of increasing twinning rates. Twins are a bad outcome for the offspring, parents and the healthcare system. An obvious solution to this is to transfer only one embryo and freeze the rest for potential further treatment. This study looked at the effect of doing this on the cumulative live birth rate (when the cryopreserved embryos were thawed and transferred). Patients less than 38 years of age presenting for IVF treatment and with more than two embryos suitable for transfer were offered the chance of transferring only one embryo (elective single embryo transfer, eSET) and freezing the rest. Those patients declining a single embryo transfer had two transferred and served as the controls. Patients not achieving a pregnancy returned for a frozen embryo transfer but were not restricted on the number transferred (to a maximum of two). Cumulative live birth rates were recorded over the ensuing two years. Statistical comparisons were made using paired chi-square tests. The live birth rates from the initial fresh transfer was 41% for eSET (41/111) and significantly higher (53%, P<0.05) for the two-embryo transfer group. These differences were eliminated when the frozen embryos were factored in, both groups rising to 61% of patients treated (68 and 172 live births, respectively). The twinning rate was significantly reduced (P<0.01) from 33% in the two-embryo transfer group to 6% (arising from 4 sets of twins in the frozen embryo transfers) in the eSET group. eSET in the fresh embryo transfer cycle does not affect the chances of a live birth and reduces the twinning rate at least fivefold. Currently, 70% of patients under the age of 38 are electing to have eSET.

Effect of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing on live birth ratio

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Liss ◽  
Ewa Pastuszek ◽  
Sebastian Pukszta ◽  
Eva Hoffmann ◽  
Waldemar Kuczynski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
Generation Sequencing

The present study analysed live birth ratios in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles where embryo ploidy status was determined with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) using next-generation sequencing (NGS). PGT was performed on trophectoderm cells biopsied at the blastocyst stage. The present prospective cohort study included 112 women undergoing frozen embryo transfer, with NGS PGT. The control group consisted of 85 patients who underwent the IVF procedure with FET planned for a subsequent cycle. The live birth rate per cycle was higher by ~18.5 percentage points in the investigated compared with control group (42.0% vs 23.5% respectively; P = 0.012). The differences between the study and control groups were also significant for clinical pregnancy (42.0% vs 23.5% respectively; P = 0.012), implantation (41.2% vs 22.2% respectively; P = 0.001) and pregnancy loss rates (9.6% vs 28.6% respectively; P = 0.027). The results show that PGT NGS is a useful method for embryo selection and it may be implemented in routine clinical practice with propitious results.

scholarly journals CUMULATIVE LIVE BIRTH RATE IN WOMEN 37 YEARS OF AGE OR LESS WHO UTILIZE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING-ANEUPLOIDY (PGT-A) VERSUS UNTESTED EMBRYOS

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e417-e418
Author(s):  
Rachel B. Mejia ◽  
Karen M. Summers ◽  
Abigail C. Mancuso ◽  
Emily A. Capper ◽  
Patrick Ten Eyck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth

scholarly journals Fresh versus frozen single embryo transfer in Chinese women of advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miaoxin Chen ◽  
Yuanyuan Wu ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Wenqiang Liu ◽  
Wentao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: Elective frozen cleavage embryo transfer resulted in significantly higher live birth rate in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome but not in ovulatory women compared with fresh embryo transfer. Further, elective single frozen blastocyst transfer had significantly higher live birth rate in ovulatory women compared with single fresh blastocyst transfer. However, it is unknown whether single frozen cleavage embryo transfer results in higher cumulative live birth rate in women of advanced age undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of frozen cleavage embryo transfer with fresh cleavage embryo transfer in Chinese women of advanced age. Methods: This study is a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial (1:1 treatment ratio of frozen embryo transfer vs. fresh embryo transfer). A total of 840 women of advanced age with normal ovarian reserve undergoing the first cycle of IVF or ICSI will be enrolled and randomized into two parallel groups. Participants in group A will undergo frozen single cleavage embryo transfer, and participants in group B will undergo fresh single cleavage embryo transfer. The primary outcome is the cumulative live birth rate of the trial IVF/ICSI cycle within 12 months after randomization. This study is powered to detect an absolute difference of 8% (23% vs 15%) at the significance level of 0.05 and 80% statistical power based on a two-sided test. Discussion: The results of this study will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of frozen cleavage embryo transfer compared with fresh cleavage embryo transfer in women of advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000029330. Registered on 25 Jan 2020. Keywords: Frozen embryo transfer, advanced age, in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), live birth, randomized controlled trial.

scholarly journals Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in uterus transplant patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 263349412110098
Author(s):  
Rhea Chattopadhyay ◽  
Elliott Richards ◽  
Valerie Libby ◽  
Rebecca Flyckt
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Uterus Transplantation ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Dilation And Curettage

Uterus transplantation is an emerging treatment for uterine factor infertility. In vitro fertilization with cryopreservation of embryos prior is required before a patient can be listed for transplant. Whether or not to perform universal preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be addressed by centers considering a uterus transplant program. The advantages and disadvantages of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in this unique population are presented. The available literature is reviewed to determine the utility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in uterus transplantation protocols. Theoretical benefits of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy include decreased time to pregnancy in a population that benefits from minimization of exposure to immunosuppressive agents and decreased chance of spontaneous abortion requiring a dilation and curettage. Drawbacks include increased cost per in vitro fertilization cycle, increased number of required in vitro fertilization cycles to achieve a suitable number of embryos prior to listing for transplant, and a questionable benefit to live birth rate in younger patients. Thoughtful consideration of whether or not to use preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is necessary in uterus transplant trials. Age is likely a primary factor that can be useful in determining which uterus transplant recipients benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document