Use of 911 for Rapid Re-Triage of Critical Trauma Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-494
Author(s):  
Jake Toy ◽  
Clayton Kazan ◽  
Marianne Gausche-Hill ◽  
Nichole Bosson
Keyword(s):  
Community Hospital ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Data ◽  
Transport Time ◽  
Educational Module ◽  
Common Criteria ◽  
Total Transport ◽  
New Community

AbstractObjectives:The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a 911 trauma re-triage protocol implemented at a new community hospital in a region with a high volume of trauma and frequent transports by private vehicle.Methods:This retrospective cohort study included all trauma patients ≥15 years old transferred via 911 trauma re-triage from a new community hospital over a 10-month period from August 2015 through April 2016. Criteria for 911 trauma re-triage were developed with input from local Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and trauma experts. An educational module, along with the criteria and implementation steps, was distributed to the emergency department (ED) personnel at the community hospital. Data were abstracted from the regional trauma registry, and the EMS patient care records were reviewed. Primary outcomes were: (1) median total transport time; and (2) proportion of patients who met the 911 re-triage criteria.Results:During the study period, 32 patients with traumatic injuries were transferred via 911 re-triage to the closest trauma center (TC). The median age of patients was 31 years (IQR 24-45 years) with 78% male and 66% suffering from a penetrating mechanism. The median prehospital provider scene time was 10 minutes (IQR 8-12 minutes) and transport time was seven minutes (IQR 6-9 minutes). Median total transport time was 17 minutes (IQR 15-20 minutes). Seventeen patients (53%) met 911 re-triage criteria as determined by study investigators. The most common criteria met was “penetrating injury to the head, neck, or torso” in 14 cases.Conclusion:This study demonstrated that 911 re-triage was a feasible strategy to expeditiously transfer critical trauma patients to a TC within a mature trauma system in an urban-suburban setting with a median total transport time of 17 minutes.

scholarly journals From roadside to hospital: A pilot study to investigate the factors influencing the time taken to deliver trauma patients to a regional hospital

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malcolm Boyle ◽  
Peter O’Meara
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Regional Hospital ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Transport Time ◽  
The Right

IntroductionOne of the trauma system objectives for the ambulance service is to get the right patient to the right hospital in a timely manner. The Review of Trauma and Emergency Services in Victoria, Australia, identified prolonged prehospital scene times of greater than 20 minutes for non trapped patients as a deficiency that may have adverse outcomes for severely injured trauma patients. The objective of this pilot study was to identify the factors that impact on the timely transfer of trauma patients from the scene of an incident to a regional hospital emergency department and justification for the delays, as the basis for a further detailed study.MethodsA retrospective pilot cohort study of trauma patients transported by ambulance to the emergency department of the Latrobe Regional Hospital over a six-month period who had an emergency department triage category of 1, 2 or 3 was undertaken. Data relating to the prehospital care of trauma patients with scene times > 20 minutes and transport times > 30 minutes were extracted from Rural Ambulance Victoria patient care records and hospital patient records. Ethics approval was granted.ResultsThere were 70 trauma patients transported to the hospital during the collection period. Of these 49 patients were available for analysis, 21 cases were excluded due to incomplete time or ED triage details. There were 12 cases where scene times were > 20 minutes. Only one paramedic crew spent an unjustifiably long time at the scene and only one patient had a transport time to hospital > 30 minutes.ConclusionThis pilot study confirms that there are prolonged prehospital scene times involving paramedics, however, the study suggests that most of the extended times are explained by factors outside the control of the attending paramedics. There was only one case where the scene time was not justified. One patient had a transport time > 30 minutes which was due to the patient being taken to a higher level of care. Experiences from this pilot study have led to changes in subsequent prehospital trauma studies.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of trauma care systems at different stages of development in reducing mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e047439
Author(s):  
Rayan Jafnan Alharbi ◽  
Virginia Lewis ◽  
Sumina Shrestha ◽  
Charne Miller
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Trauma Care ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Trauma Systems ◽  
Stages Of Development

IntroductionThe introduction of trauma systems that began in the 1970s resulted in improved trauma care and a decreased rate of morbidity and mortality of trauma patients. Worldwide, little is known about the effectiveness of trauma care system at different stages of development, from establishing a trauma centre, to implementing a trauma system and as trauma systems mature. The objective of this study is to extract and analyse data from research that evaluates mortality rates according to different stages of trauma system development globally.Methods and analysisThe proposed review will comply with the checklist of the ‘Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis’. In this review, only peer-reviewed articles written in English, human-related studies and published between January 2000 and December 2020 will be included. Articles will be retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Additional articles will be identified from other sources such as references of included articles and author lists. Two independent authors will assess the eligibility of studies as well as critically appraise and assess the methodological quality of all included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias for Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. Two independent authors will extract the data to minimise errors and bias during the process of data extraction using an extraction tool developed by the authors. For analysis calculation, effect sizes will be expressed as risk ratios or ORs for dichotomous data or weighted (or standardised) mean differences and 95% CIs for continuous data in this systematic review.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review will use secondary data only, therefore, research ethics approval is not required. The results from this study will be submitted to a peer-review journal for publication and we will present our findings at national and international conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019142842.

The value of trauma patients’ centralization: an analysis of a regional Italian Trauma System performance with TMPM-ICD-9

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Fugazzola ◽  
Vanni Agnoletti ◽  
Silvia Bertoni ◽  
Costanza Martino ◽  
Matteo Tomasoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
System Performance ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Trauma Patients

SP9.1.7 Emergency Laparotomy for Trauma in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a Prospective Multicentre Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Vulliamy ◽  
Max Marsden ◽  
Richard Carden ◽  
Karim Brohi ◽  
Ross Davenport ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Young Males ◽  
Prospective Multicentre Study ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Emergency Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Aims Trauma patients requiring abdominal surgery have significant morbidity and mortality, but are not included in existing national audits of emergency laparotomy. The aim of this study was to examine processes of care and outcomes among trauma patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery in the UK and Ireland. Methods A prospective trainee-led multicentre audit was conducted over six months from January 2019 across the national trauma system. Patients undergoing laparotomy or laparoscopy within 24 hours of injury were included. Subgroup analysis was conducted in those requiring major haemorrhage protocol (MHP) activation. Results The study included 363 patients from 34 hospitals (22 major trauma centres). The majority were young males with no co-morbidities who required surgery for control of bleeding (51%) or exploration of penetrating injuries (46%). Over 85% received consultant-led care in the emergency department (318/363) and operating theatre (321/363). The MHP subgroup made up 45% of the cohort but accounted for 97% of deaths and 79% of ICU days, with a mortality rate of 19% and a massive transfusion rate of 32%. Compared to non-MHP patients they had shorter times to theatre (122 vs 218 minutes, p < 0.001), higher rates of advanced prehospital care (60% vs 33%, p < 0.001) and higher rates of consultant-led care (95% vs 85%, p < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of trauma patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery receive consultant-delivered perioperative care which is appropriately tailored to patient risk profile. Despite this, mortality and resource utilization among high-risk patients remains substantial, justifying ongoing performance improvement initiatives and research into novel therapeutics.

Increased mortality of patients with aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by prolonged transport time to a high-volume neurosurgical unit

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper H. van Lieshout ◽  
Iris Bruland ◽  
Igor Fischer ◽  
Jan F. Cornelius ◽  
Marcel A. Kamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Transport Time

scholarly journals EP.WE.105Hand trauma during COVID pandemic: a tertiary trauma centre experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Ghareib ◽  
Sylwia Oniska ◽  
Laura Karran ◽  
Jamil Moledina
Keyword(s):  
High Volume ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Active Movement ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Hand Fractures ◽  
Good Movement ◽  
Hand Fracture ◽  
June July

Abstract Introduction St. George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is a tertiary trauma centre. We receive a high volume of hand referrals from all over the south West London region. Closed hand fractures represent a significant number of our referrals. COVID-19 has put more burden in all health service endangering poor management of these trauma patients. Aim To assess management of close hand trauma patients during COVID pandemic. Methods Retrospective evaluation of closed hand fracture referrals during June, July, and August 2020. Clinical documentations, operative details and follow up visit notes have been reviewed. Results 106 patients have been included. 47 patients treated surgically with 81% of them were in need for metalwork insertion. Most of operations were done within 8 days. Number of hospital visits was variable with a mean of six days for adult and two days for children. Patient who was in need for hand therapy have been seen within the first 8 days of their surgery. At three months follow up, only three cases had infection. Only one case had osteomyelitis and the other two case had infected metalwork. Most of the patents reported good movement in ASSH Total Active Movement of Hand score (TAM) at the end of the three months. Conclusion Despite COVID 19 pandemic our service managed to achieve acceptable results in dealing with these cases. Yet, securing a reasonable number of operating sessions and clinic appointments remains a challenge.

scholarly journals Effect of Under Triage on Early Mortality After Major Pediatric Trauma: A Registry-based Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
François-Xavier Ageron ◽  
Jordan Porteaud ◽  
Jean-Noël Evain ◽  
Anne Millet ◽  
Jules Greze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Trauma Care ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Backgroundlittle is known about the effect of under triage on early mortality in trauma in a pediatric population. Our objective is to describe the effect of under triage on 24 hour-mortality after major pediatric trauma in a regional trauma systemMethodsThis cohort study was conducted from January 2009 to December 2017. Data were obtained from the registry of the Northern French Alps Trauma System. The network guidelines triage pediatric trauma patients according to an algorithm shared with adult patients. Under triage was defined by the number of pediatric trauma patients that required specialized trauma care transported to a non-level I pediatric trauma center on the total number of injured patients with critical resource use. The effect of under triage on 24 hour-mortality was assessed with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and a propensity score (Ps) matching analysis. ResultsA total of 1 143 pediatric patients were included (mean [SD], age 10 [5] years), mainly after a blunt trauma (1130 [99%]). Of the children, 402 (35%) had an ISS higher than 15 and 547 (48%) required specialized trauma care. Nineteen (1.7%) patients died within 24 hours. Under triage rate was 33% based on the need of specialized trauma care. Under triage of children requiring specialized trauma care increased the risk of death in IPTW (risk difference: 6.0 [95% CI 1.3-10.7]) and Ps matching analyses (risk difference: 3.1 [95% CI 0.8-5.4]).ConclusionsIn a regional inclusive trauma system, under triage increased the risk of early death after pediatric major trauma.

scholarly journals Improvement in geriatric trauma outcomes in an evolving trauma system

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amund Hovengen Ringen ◽  
Iver Anders Gaski ◽  
Hege Rustad ◽  
Nils Oddvar Skaga ◽  
Christine Gaarder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma System ◽  
Trauma Team ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Trauma Team Activation ◽  
Activation Rate ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Activation Rates

BackgroundThe elderly trauma patient has increased mortality compared with younger patients. During the last 15 years, initial treatment of severely injured patients at Oslo University Hospital Ulleval (OUHU) has changed resulting in overall improved outcomes. Whether this holds true for the elderly trauma population needs exploration and was the aim of the present study.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 2628 trauma patients 61 years or older admitted to OUHU during the 12-year period, 2002–2013. The population was stratified based on age (61–70 years, 71–80 years, 81 years and older) and divided into time periods: 2002–2009 (P1) and 2010–2013 (P2). Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to identify clinically relevant core variables correlated with mortality and trauma team activation rate.ResultsCrude mortality decreased from 19% in P1 to 13% in P2 (p<0.01) with an OR of 0.77 (95 %CI 0.65 to 0.91) when admitted in P2. Trauma team activation rates increased from 53% in P1 to 72% in P2 (p<0.01) with an OR of 2.16 (95% CI 1.93 to 2.41) for being met by a trauma team in P2. Mortality increased from 10% in the age group 61–70 years to 26% in the group above 80 years. Trauma team activation rates decreased from 71% in the age group 61–70 years to 50% in the age group older than 80 years. Median ISS were 17 in all three age groups and in both time periods.DiscussionDevelopment of a multidisciplinary dedicated trauma service is associated with increased trauma team activation rate as well as survival in geriatric trauma patients. As expected, mortality increased with age, although inversely related to the likelihood of being met by a trauma team. Trauma team activation should be considered for all trauma patients older than 70 years.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Is Outcome after Blunt Splenic Injury in Adults Better in High-Volume Trauma Centers?

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 942-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian G. Harbrecht ◽  
Mazen S. Zenati ◽  
Louis H. Alarcon ◽  
Juan B. Ochoa ◽  
Juan C. Puyana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Case Volume ◽  
Center Volume ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
Outcome Differences

An association between outcome and case volume has been demonstrated for selected complex operations. The relationship between trauma center volume and patient outcome has also been examined, but no clear consensus has been established. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) has published recommendations on optimal trauma center volume for level 1 designation. We examined whether this volume criteria was associated with outcome differences for the treatment of adult blunt splenic injuries. Using a state trauma database, ACS criteria were used to stratify trauma centers into high-volume centers (>240 patients with Injury Severity Score >15 per year) or low-volume centers, and outcome was evaluated. There were 1,829 patients treated at high-volume centers and 1,040 patients treated at low-volume centers. There was no difference in age, gender, emergency department pulse, emergency department systolic blood pressure, or overall mortality between high- and low-volume centers. Patients at low-volume centers were more likely to be treated operatively, but the overall success rate of nonoperative management between high-and low-volume centers was similar. These data suggest that ACS criteria for trauma centers level designation are not associated with differences in outcome in the treatment of adult blunt splenic injuries in this regional trauma system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document