Health status, resource consumption, and costs of dysthymic patients in Italian primary care

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrado Barbui ◽  
Livio Garattini ◽  
Iva Krulichova ◽  
Giovanni Apolone

SummaryAims – To describe the health status, resource consumption and costs of patients with dysthymic disorder in the Italian primary care setting. Methods – A total of 79 general practitioners (GPs) participated the study. Diagnosis was based on each GP's clinical assessment. At entry the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used as a supporting diag- nostic aid. Health status was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire. Resource consumption and costs regarded the six months before enrolment. Results – Out of 598 patients enrolled by GPs according to their clinical assessment, 503 fulfilled the MINI cri- teria and 95 did not. The latter had a better perception of their health than the former. Resource consumption was similar in the two groups; and the total per patient six-month costs did not differ significantly. Conclusions – The study confirms there may be a gap between standardised criteria for defining dysthymia and everyday clinical practice. All dysthymic patients diagnosed by GPs might be considered together from a health policy perspective.Declaration of Interest: this research was partly supported by a contribution from Sanofi-Synthelabo Italy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1056-1061
Author(s):  
Vera Georgescu ◽  
Anders Green ◽  
Peter B Jensen ◽  
Sören Möller ◽  
Eric Renard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diabetes is a frequent chronic condition, which can lead to costly complications if not managed well in the primary care setting. Potentially avoidable hospitalizations (PAH) are considered as an indirect measure of primary care. However, the association between primary care use and PAH in diabetic patients has not been investigated in France. Methods We investigate the association between primary care indicators and PAH at an individual level among persons with diabetes in a population-based cohort study on the French national health insurance database (EGB sample). PAH occurrence in 2013 was modeled as a function of primary care use and access, health status and socio-economic indicators over the exposure period 2011–12 using a cause-specific hazards model with death as a competing event. Results We included 25 293 diabetics in our cohort, among which 385 (1.5%) experienced at least 1 PAH in 2013. After adjustment on health status indicators, primary care use had a protective effect against PAH. Diabetic patients who had seen a general practitioner (GP) 10–14 times had a reduced hazard of PAH compared to less frequent encounters (HR=0.49, P<0.001). The effect size decreased when the number of encounters increased, suggesting a remaining confounding effect of health status. Conclusions For the first time in France, this study shows a protective effect of the number of GP encounters against PAH at an individual level and highlights the importance of a frequent monitoring of diabetic patients in the primary care setting to prevent PAH occurrence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (9) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Suneeta Kochhar

Suneeta Kochhar looks at what nurses need to know about this common dermatological condition


2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 71-82
Author(s):  
David C. Speer ◽  
Larry W. Dupree ◽  
Celestino Vega ◽  
Myra G. Schneider ◽  
Jini M. Hanjian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riikka Riihimies ◽  
Elise Kosunen ◽  
Tuomas Koskela

BACKGROUND An aging population and increasing multimorbidity challenge health care systems worldwide. Patient segmentation aims to recognize groups of patients with similar needs, offer targeted services to these groups, and reduce the burden of health care. In this study, the unique Finnish innovation Navigator, a web-based service for patient segmentation, is presented. Both patients and health care professionals complete the electronic questionnaire concerning patients’ coping in everyday life and health state. Thus, it considers the patient perspective on self-care. One of four customership-strategy (CS) groups (self-acting, community, cooperating, and network) is then proposed in response to the answers given. This resulting strategy helps both professionals to coordinate patient health care and patients to utilize appropriate health services. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine the feasibility, validity, and reliability of the Navigator service in the segmentation of patients with diabetes into four CS groups in a primary care setting. Patient characteristics concerning demographic status, chronic conditions, disabilities, health-related quality of life, and well-being in different CS groups will be described. We hypothesize that patients in the network group will be older, have more illnesses, chronic conditions or disabilities, and require more health care services than patients in the self-acting group. METHODS In this mixed methods study, data collection was based on questionnaires (user experience of Navigator, demographic and health status, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, EuroQol 5D, Wellbeing Questionnaire 12, and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire) issued to 300 patients with diabetes and on user-experience questionnaires for and semistructured focus-group interviews with 12 nurses. Navigator-database reports and diabetes-care values (blood pressure, BMI, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein, albumin-creatinine, smoking status) were collected. Qualitative and descriptive analyses were used to study the feasibility, content, concurrent, and face validity of Navigator. While criterion and concurrent validity were examined with correlations, reliability was examined by calculating Cohen kappa and Cronbach alpha. Construct validity is studied by performing exploratory-factor analysis on Navigator data reports and by hypothesis testing. The values, demographics, and health status of patients in different groups were described, and differences between groups were studied by comparing means. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess which variables affect CS group variation. RESULTS Data collection was completed in September 2019, and the first feasibility results are expected by the end of 2020. Further results and publications are expected in 2021 and 2022. CONCLUSIONS This is the first scientific study concerning Navigator’s psychometric properties. The study will examine the segregation of patients with diabetes into four CS groups in a primary care setting and the differences between patients in groups. This study will assist in Navigator’s further development as a patient segmentation method considering patients’ perspectives on self-care. This study will not prove the effectiveness or efficacy of Navigator; therefore, it is essential to study these outcomes of separate care pathways. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/20570


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangeta Vadivelu ◽  
Zheng Feei Ma ◽  
Ean Wah Ong ◽  
Norhaliza Hassan ◽  
Nik Fariza Husna Nik Hassan ◽  
...  

Background: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERDQ) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire (QOLRAD) are reliable tools for evaluation of GERD. Aim: We aimed to test validity and reliability of Malay language translations of GERDQ and QOLRAD in a primary care setting. Methods: The questionnaires were first translated into the Malay language (GERDQ-M and QOLRAD-M). Patients from primary care clinics with suspected GERD were recruited to complete GERDQ-M, QOLRAD-M, and Malay-translated 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36 or SF-36-M), and underwent endoscopy and 24-h pH-impedance test. Results: A total of 104 (mean age 47.1 years, women 51.9%) participants were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity for GERDQ-M cut-off score ≥8 were 90.2 and 77.4%, respectively. Based on this cut-off score, 54.7% had a high probability of GERD diagnosis. GERD-M score ≥8 vs. < 8 was associated with erosive esophagitis (p < 0.001), hiatus hernia (p = 0.03), greater DeMeester score (p = 0.001), and Zerbib scores for acid refluxes (p < 0.001) but not non-acid refluxes (p = 0.1). Mean total scores of QOLRAD-M and SF-36-M were correlated (r = 0.74, p < 0.001). GERDQ-M ≥8, erosive esophagitis, and DeMeester ≥14.72 were associated with impaired QOLRAD-M in all domains (all p < 0.02) but this was not seen with SF-36. Conclusions: GERDQ-M and QOLRAD-M are valid and reliable tools applicable in a primary care setting.


10.2196/20570 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e20570
Author(s):  
Riikka Riihimies ◽  
Elise Kosunen ◽  
Tuomas Koskela

Background An aging population and increasing multimorbidity challenge health care systems worldwide. Patient segmentation aims to recognize groups of patients with similar needs, offer targeted services to these groups, and reduce the burden of health care. In this study, the unique Finnish innovation Navigator, a web-based service for patient segmentation, is presented. Both patients and health care professionals complete the electronic questionnaire concerning patients’ coping in everyday life and health state. Thus, it considers the patient perspective on self-care. One of four customership-strategy (CS) groups (self-acting, community, cooperating, and network) is then proposed in response to the answers given. This resulting strategy helps both professionals to coordinate patient health care and patients to utilize appropriate health services. Objective This study aims to determine the feasibility, validity, and reliability of the Navigator service in the segmentation of patients with diabetes into four CS groups in a primary care setting. Patient characteristics concerning demographic status, chronic conditions, disabilities, health-related quality of life, and well-being in different CS groups will be described. We hypothesize that patients in the network group will be older, have more illnesses, chronic conditions or disabilities, and require more health care services than patients in the self-acting group. Methods In this mixed methods study, data collection was based on questionnaires (user experience of Navigator, demographic and health status, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, EuroQol 5D, Wellbeing Questionnaire 12, and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire) issued to 300 patients with diabetes and on user-experience questionnaires for and semistructured focus-group interviews with 12 nurses. Navigator-database reports and diabetes-care values (blood pressure, BMI, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein, albumin-creatinine, smoking status) were collected. Qualitative and descriptive analyses were used to study the feasibility, content, concurrent, and face validity of Navigator. While criterion and concurrent validity were examined with correlations, reliability was examined by calculating Cohen kappa and Cronbach alpha. Construct validity is studied by performing exploratory-factor analysis on Navigator data reports and by hypothesis testing. The values, demographics, and health status of patients in different groups were described, and differences between groups were studied by comparing means. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess which variables affect CS group variation. Results Data collection was completed in September 2019, and the first feasibility results are expected by the end of 2020. Further results and publications are expected in 2021 and 2022. Conclusions This is the first scientific study concerning Navigator’s psychometric properties. The study will examine the segregation of patients with diabetes into four CS groups in a primary care setting and the differences between patients in groups. This study will assist in Navigator’s further development as a patient segmentation method considering patients’ perspectives on self-care. This study will not prove the effectiveness or efficacy of Navigator; therefore, it is essential to study these outcomes of separate care pathways. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/20570


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 588
Author(s):  
Oscar Bueno ◽  
María Angeles Sebastián ◽  
Sandra Cusac ◽  
Teresa Font ◽  
Laia Poblet ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 494-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Naslund ◽  
Alicia Gilsenan ◽  
Kirk Midkiff ◽  
Eric Wolford ◽  
Aileen Bown ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document