scholarly journals Primary care visits can reduce the risk of potentially avoidable hospitalizations among persons with diabetes in France

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1056-1061
Author(s):  
Vera Georgescu ◽  
Anders Green ◽  
Peter B Jensen ◽  
Sören Möller ◽  
Eric Renard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Diabetes is a frequent chronic condition, which can lead to costly complications if not managed well in the primary care setting. Potentially avoidable hospitalizations (PAH) are considered as an indirect measure of primary care. However, the association between primary care use and PAH in diabetic patients has not been investigated in France. Methods We investigate the association between primary care indicators and PAH at an individual level among persons with diabetes in a population-based cohort study on the French national health insurance database (EGB sample). PAH occurrence in 2013 was modeled as a function of primary care use and access, health status and socio-economic indicators over the exposure period 2011–12 using a cause-specific hazards model with death as a competing event. Results We included 25 293 diabetics in our cohort, among which 385 (1.5%) experienced at least 1 PAH in 2013. After adjustment on health status indicators, primary care use had a protective effect against PAH. Diabetic patients who had seen a general practitioner (GP) 10–14 times had a reduced hazard of PAH compared to less frequent encounters (HR=0.49, P<0.001). The effect size decreased when the number of encounters increased, suggesting a remaining confounding effect of health status. Conclusions For the first time in France, this study shows a protective effect of the number of GP encounters against PAH at an individual level and highlights the importance of a frequent monitoring of diabetic patients in the primary care setting to prevent PAH occurrence.

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan D. Wolfsthal ◽  
Rebecca Manno ◽  
Evonne Fontanilla

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mostafa ◽  
S. Tagboto ◽  
M. Robinson ◽  
A. Burden ◽  
S. Davies

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
A. Papathanasiou ◽  
I. Lentzas ◽  
E. Papavasiliou ◽  
C. Lionis

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrado Barbui ◽  
Livio Garattini ◽  
Iva Krulichova ◽  
Giovanni Apolone

SummaryAims – To describe the health status, resource consumption and costs of patients with dysthymic disorder in the Italian primary care setting. Methods – A total of 79 general practitioners (GPs) participated the study. Diagnosis was based on each GP's clinical assessment. At entry the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was used as a supporting diag- nostic aid. Health status was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire. Resource consumption and costs regarded the six months before enrolment. Results – Out of 598 patients enrolled by GPs according to their clinical assessment, 503 fulfilled the MINI cri- teria and 95 did not. The latter had a better perception of their health than the former. Resource consumption was similar in the two groups; and the total per patient six-month costs did not differ significantly. Conclusions – The study confirms there may be a gap between standardised criteria for defining dysthymia and everyday clinical practice. All dysthymic patients diagnosed by GPs might be considered together from a health policy perspective.Declaration of Interest: this research was partly supported by a contribution from Sanofi-Synthelabo Italy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document