scholarly journals BUBBLES, CRASHES, AND THE FINANCIAL CYCLE: THE IMPACT OF BANKING REGULATION ON DEEP RECESSIONS

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 1205-1246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander van der Hoog ◽  
Herbert Dawid
Keyword(s):  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Financial Contagion ◽  
Balance Sheets ◽  
Business Fluctuations ◽  
Output Fluctuations ◽  
Firm Bankruptcy ◽  
The Impact

This paper explores how different credit market and banking regulations affect business fluctuations. Capital adequacy- and reserve requirements are analyzed for their effect on the risk of severe downturns. We develop an agent-based macroeconomic model in which financial contagion is transmitted through balance sheets in an endogenous firm-bank network, which incorporates firm bankruptcy and heterogeneity among banks to capture the fact that contagion effects are bank specific. Using concepts from the empirical literature to identify amplitude and duration of recessions and expansions, we show that more stringent liquidity regulations are best to dampen output fluctuations and prevent severe downturns. Under such regulations, both leverage along expansions and amplitude of recessions become smaller. More stringent capital requirements induce larger output fluctuations and lead to deeper, more fragile recessions. This indicates that the capital adequacy requirement is procyclical and therefore not advisable as a measure to prevent financial contagion.

Islamic Banking Regulations in Light of Basel II

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kabir Hassan ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Mannan Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Basel Ii ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Regulatory Standards

This paper seeks to determine whether the existing regulatory standards and supervisory framework are adequate to ensure the viability, strength, and continued expansion of Islamic financial institutions. The reemergence of Islamic banking and the attention given to it by regulators around the globe as to the implications of a recently issued Basel II banking regulation makes this article timely. The Basel II framework, which is based on minimum capital requirements, a supervisory review process, and the effective use of market discipline, aligns capital adequacy with banking risks and provides an incentive for financial institutions to enhance risk management and their system of internal controls. Like conventional banks, Islamic banks operate under different regulatory regimes. The still diverse views held by the regulatory agencies of different countries on Islamic banking and finance operations make it harder to assess the overall performance of international Islamic banks. In light of the increased financial innovation and diversity of instruments offered in Islamic finance, the need to improve the transparency of bank operations is particularly relevant for Islamic banks. While product diversity is important in maintaining their competitiveness, it also requires increased transparency and disclosure to improve the understanding of markets and regulatory agencies. The governance of Islamic banks is made even more complex by the need for these banks to meet a set of ethical and financial standards defined by the Shari`ah and the nature of the financial contracts banks use to mobilize deposits. Effective transparency in this area will greatly enhance their credibility and reinforce their depositors and investors’ level of confidence.

Islamic Banking Regulations in Light of Basel II

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-101
Author(s):  
M. Kabir Hassan ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Mannan Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Basel Ii ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Regulatory Standards

This paper seeks to determine whether the existing regulatory standards and supervisory framework are adequate to ensure the viability, strength, and continued expansion of Islamic financial institutions. The reemergence of Islamic banking and the attention given to it by regulators around the globe as to the implications of a recently issued Basel II banking regulation makes this article timely. The Basel II framework, which is based on minimum capital requirements, a supervisory review process, and the effective use of market discipline, aligns capital adequacy with banking risks and provides an incentive for financial institutions to enhance risk management and their system of internal controls. Like conventional banks, Islamic banks operate under different regulatory regimes. The still diverse views held by the regulatory agencies of different countries on Islamic banking and finance operations make it harder to assess the overall performance of international Islamic banks. In light of the increased financial innovation and diversity of instruments offered in Islamic finance, the need to improve the transparency of bank operations is particularly relevant for Islamic banks. While product diversity is important in maintaining their competitiveness, it also requires increased transparency and disclosure to improve the understanding of markets and regulatory agencies. The governance of Islamic banks is made even more complex by the need for these banks to meet a set of ethical and financial standards defined by the Shari`ah and the nature of the financial contracts banks use to mobilize deposits. Effective transparency in this area will greatly enhance their credibility and reinforce their depositors and investors’ level of confidence.

„Qualitative“ Bankenaufsicht – „Königsweg“ der Regulierung?

2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Paul
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
First Century ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Banking Supervision ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Proposal A

Abstract Banking regulation in the twenty-first century is at the crossroads. The article discusses the question whether the supervisory review of bank risk management systems is superior to the minimum capital requirements in traditional style. It points out the serious problems of both ways - especially the first one, which was preferred by the Basle Committee of Banking Supervision in its proposal ,,A new capital adequacy framework`` (June 1999).

scholarly journals PENGUATAN STRUKTUR MODAL SEBAGAI PEMENUHAN REGULASI DAN PENDUKUNG PENGEMBANGAN BISNIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51
Author(s):  
Tedi Setiawan ◽  
Jaja Suteja ◽  
Ellen Rusliati
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Banking Industry ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Effective Strategies ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
The Impact

Decision on capital structure have an important role in determinig banking performance.This study aims to find alternative strategies for Bank X in fulfilling the capital requirements and to measure its the effectivities in order to reach the capital requirements of the Bank X to be in accordance with the regulations in 2018. The results of this study are expected to provide useful information related to the importance of strengthening the capital structure of the company, especially in the banking industry in order to maintain the continuity of business and to win in the market competition. The study was conducted at Bank X was located in Bandung. The research method used was survey with qualitative research approaches. While the type of research was explorative descriptive analysis. The results of the study was found three effective strategies to meet the capital needs of Bank X in 2018, namely asset revaluation, reduction in dividend payout ratio (DPR) and the issuance of subordinated bonds. These three strategies could improve Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). while alternative simulations need to be carried out to determine the impact of the decision making.

U. S. Investment Banks in the Context of the Post-Crisis International Banking Regulation Reform

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-40
Author(s):  
Eduard Dzhagityan ◽  
Anastasiya Podrugina ◽  
Sofya Streltsova
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Investment Banks ◽  
Basel Iii ◽  
International Banking ◽  
Minimum Capital ◽  
Negative Effect

The article looks into the reasons underlying the outspread of the full-scale mechanism of banking regulation over U. S. investment banks. We analyze the effect of the Basel III standards on stress-resilience of investment banks and examine the role of U. S. investment banks in ensuring financial stability. Based on regression analysis we found that minimum capital adequacy standards of Basel III do not have negative effect on ROE of the U. S. investment banks that are G-SIB category-designate; however, additional capital requirements (Higher Loss Absorbency (HLA) surcharge) that depend on G-SIB’s systemic significance according to their bucket as per Financial Stability Board classification do have significant and negative effect on ROE in the post crisis period. Besides, leverage requirements that also depend on G-SIB’s systemic significance have a statistically significant effect on ROE.

scholarly journals THE NEW CAPITAL ADEQUACY FRAMEWORK (BASEL III) OPTIONS AND ISSUES IN COMMERCIAL BANKS OF LITHUANIA

Ekonomika ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filomena Jasevičienė ◽  
Daiva Jurkšaitytė
Keyword(s):  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
System Stability ◽  
Basel Iii ◽  
Management Problem ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
The World

Currently, banking is one of the most regulated activities in the world, because banks are the most important institutional units engaged in financial intermediation and affects not only the whole national economy of the country, but the global financial market as well. One of the key components of banking regulation are requirements expected for the bank capital, which prevent the bank from various unforeseen risks incurring substantial losses and are a sort of guarantee to maintain the financial system stability. For this reason, it is useful to find out what factors affect the capital adequacy ratio, and what measures the banks are going to take in order to meet the new capital requirements. The present research reveals the options of the implementation of the new system and the main problems faced by banks. The paper consists of four main parts: review of theory and literature, the research methodology of the factors influencing the capital adequacy, the study of factors influencing the capital adequacy ratio, and the capital adequacy management problem areas according to the Basel III requirements and conclusions.

scholarly journals The Impact of CRD IV on Bank Lending

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-217
Author(s):  
Matias Huhtilainen
Keyword(s):  
Bank Lending ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Bank Profitability ◽  
Consistent Finding ◽  
Loan Supply ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Crd Iv

This study addresses the post-financial crisis EU banking regulation reform CRD IV. The specific focus is on the relationship between increased capital requirements and the subsequent change in both supply and the price of bank credit. This study employs a twofold data consisting of a panel of Finnish unlisted savings and cooperative banks’ key figures over the period 2002-2018 and a representative survey conducted with personnel of Finnish institutions. In addition to the consistent finding in regards to the effect of bank profitability as well as fairly consistent findings in regards to the effect of bank size and GDP growth, the key finding suggests a slight decrease in loan supply under the CRD IV.

Risk Management and Capital Adequacy Norms for Banks

2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udayan Kumar Basu
Keyword(s):  
Value At Risk ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Balance Sheets ◽  
Net Worth ◽  
Market Risks ◽  
Reserve Bank ◽  
Capital Adequacy Ratio ◽  
Project Risks ◽  
Current Article ◽  
The Impact

The overall banking scenario has undergone a dramatic change in the wake of liberalization of markets and advent of the concept of universal banking. Commercial banks can now operate as veritable financial supermarkets offering all kinds of services under one roof. The various regulatory requirements and the presence of NPAs in banks' balance sheets introduce certain rigidities in their operating parameters. Besides, the investment options expose them to market and project risks, and brings the issue of financial fragility to the foreground. In view of the new kinds of risk affecting banks and increasing global competition faced by them, their capitalization and the efficacy of the regulatory and supervisory norms assume a greater significance. The current article explores the impact of possible changes in CRR and SLR on a bank's cut-off risk, i.e. the maximum permissible risk without any default, as well as its dependence on interest rate and capital adequacy ratio. Basel II norms for taking market risk into account, the use of Value at Risk as its measure and the recent guideline by Reserve Bank of India to relate the overall market exposure to net worth, have been examined. A method towards selection of an appropriate capital adequacy ratio to cover market risks has also been proposed.

Bank regulation and credit crunch: evidence from MENA region commercial banks

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chawki EL-Moussawi ◽  
Mohamad Kassem ◽  
Josse Roussel
Keyword(s):  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Banking Regulation ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Institutional Variables ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

PurposeThis paper focuses on the relationship between the regulatory capital requirements and the supply of credit for commercial banks that are operating in the MENA region from 1999 till 2017.Design/methodology/approachThe application of the Fixed Effects Model on a panel of commercial banks in the MENA region has shown a negative relationship between supply of credit and both the capital requirements and solvency ratios.FindingsThe results showed that the idiosyncratic, the macroeconomic and the institutional variables affect the supply of credit behavior of banks. The robustness tests using the Two-Stage Least Square method (2SLS) also led to a negative correlation between the growth of credit and capital requirements. Specific macroeconomic and institutional variables have revealed the expected sign and are significant regardless of the estimated specifications.Research limitations/implicationsThis work can be subjected to further future extensions. The explanatory power of our model can be improved by incorporating variables that reflect the corporate governance and structure of banking sector. Similarly, we can also include a variable that takes into account the increasing competition that could affect the stability of the banking sector and therefore the prudential banking regulation.Originality/valuePrevious studies that investigated only the relationship between capital level and risk-taking behavior of banks in the MENA region did not take into account neither the economic and institutional environment nor the impact of these regulations on credit (loans) supply.

Profit- and loss-sharing impact on Islamic bank liquidity in GCC countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1791-1806
Author(s):  
Khoutem Ben Jedidia
Keyword(s):  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Profit Sharing ◽  
Capital Adequacy ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Islamic Banks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Islamic Bank ◽  
Gcc Countries ◽  
Long Run ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically assess the impact of the principle of profit- and loss-sharing (PLS) on the exposure to liquidity risk of Islamic banks in Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) countries. The Islamic bank activity is distinguished by a PLS principle, which is likely to involve specificities in the bank liquidity issue. Design/methodology/approach This paper investigates the determinants of Islamic bank liquidity over the period 2005–2016 using a panel of 23 Islamic banks in GCC. The system of generalized method of moment estimators is applied. Findings The findings reveal that while profit-sharing investment accounts (PSIAs) are inversely proportional to Islamic bank liquidity, the PLS investment does not seem to act as a determinant of the bank liquidity. The fact that PSIAs are globally short-run accounts, but finance long-run projects leads to a substantial maturity mismatches, which limits the availability of liquidity buffer and exacerbates the bank’s exposure to liquidity risk. Moreover, capital adequacy ratio has significant and positive association with bank liquidity, as a strong capital ratio helps to strengthen the liquidity control. However, return on assets has a negative significant impact on bank liquidity. For instance, if the bank holds more cash, it deprives itself from placing funds and earning returns, which causes its profitability to decline. Practical implications This paper gives further insights to better improve the liquidity risk management in a context of scarcity of Shariah-compliant instruments. Islamic bank needs to determine the PLS purpose and goals to be consistent with the “bank’s financing policy” and convince its depositors to use their deposits for medium and long-run investments. Originality/value Unlike previous empirical research, this investigation tries to better grasp the Islamic bank liquidity issue by focusing on the PLS impact on liquidity risk. It aims to fill in the gap in the empirical literature on this topic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document