scholarly journals PRECAUTIONARY LEARNING AND INFLATIONARY BIASES

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1124-1150
Author(s):  
Chetan Dave ◽  
James Feigenbaum

In a canonical monetary policy model in which the central bank learns about underlying fundamentals by estimating the parameters of a Phillips curve, we show that the bank’s loss function is asymmetric such that parameter overestimates may be more or less costly than underestimates, creating a precautionary motive in estimation. This motive suggests the use of a more efficient variance-adjusted least-squares estimator for learning about fundamentals. Informed by this “precautionary learning” the central bank sets low inflation targets, and the economy can settle near a Ramsey equilibrium.

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Tillmann

Empirical evidence suggests that the instrument rule describing the interest rate–setting behavior of the Federal Reserve is nonlinear. This paper shows that optimal monetary policy under parameter uncertainty can motivate this pattern. If the central bank is uncertain about the slope of the Phillips curve and follows a min–max strategy to formulate policy, the interest rate reacts more strongly to inflation when inflation is further away from target. The reason is that the worst case the central bank takes into account is endogenous and depends on the inflation rate and the output gap. As inflation increases, the worst-case perception of the Phillips curve slope becomes larger, thus requiring a stronger interest rate adjustment. Empirical evidence supports this form of nonlinearity for post-1982 U.S. data.


2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Krawczyk ◽  
Kunhong Kim

Herbert A. Simon, 1978 Economics Nobel Prize laureate, talked about satisficing (his neologism) rather than optimizing as being what economists really need. Indeed, optimization might be an unsuitable solution procedure (in that it suggests a unique “optimal” solution) for problems where many solutions could be satisfactory. We think that looking for an applicable monetary policy is a problem of this kind because there is no unique way in which a central bank can achieve a desired inflation (unemployment, etc.) path. We think that it is viability theory, which is a relatively young area of mathematics, that rigorously captures the essence of satisficing. We aim to use viability analysis to analyze a simple macro policy model and show how some robust adjustment rules can be endogenously obtained.


2019 ◽  
pp. 54-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Ranneva

Modern economic theory considers expectations as a key determinant of actual inflation. How agents form those expectations therefore plays a central role in macroeconomic dynamics and policy-making. The understanding of the expectation formation process and the real-time estimation of expectations are especially important for central banks because they need to be sure that longer-term inflation expectations are anchored at the target of inflation, set by the central bank. When expectations are anchored — it is a clear sign that the monetary policy is effective and that markets trust the central bank. However, it is not easy to assess the expected inflation: it is not observable and cannot be directly measured. Central banks can only use the indirect estimates of this variable. For many years the main theoretical framework for modeling and analysis of inflation expectations was Phillips curve with rational expectations which substituted the adaptive expectations. Today many alternative models of expectation formation are available. The article provides a brief overview of the evolution of theoretical approaches to inflation expectation formation and their impact on the monetary policy. Besides, using the experience of the U.S., the article addresses two main ways to gauge inflation expectations empirically — survey-based measures (for different groups of respondents) and measures based on the data from American financial markets. Shortcomings and merits of both approaches are discussed, as well as the importance of highly developed financial markets, which can become the source of more precise information on inflation expectations.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Ferreira ◽  
Andreza Aparecida Palma ◽  
Marcos Minoru Hasegawa

PurposeThis paper analyzes the potential presence of time-varying asymmetries in the preference parameters of the Central Bank of Brazil during the inflation targeting regime.Design/methodology/approachGiven the econometric issues inherent to classical time-varying parameter (TVP) regressions, a Bayesian estimation procedure is implemented in order to provide more robust parameter estimates. A stochastic volatility specification is also included to take into account the potential presence of conditional heteroskedasticity.FindingsThe obtained results show that the reduced form and structural parameters were not constant during the period considered. Moreover, the subsequent analysis of the preference parameters provided evidences of short periods in which asymmetry was an important feature to the conduction of monetary policy in Brazil. Yet, during most of the sample period, the loss function was considered to be symmetrical.Originality/valueThis paper aims to contribute to the rather scarce monetary debate on time-varying central bank preferences. The study of Lopes and Aragón (2014) is, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the only study for Brazil considering specifically TVPs. The authors applied Kalman filter estimation to data from 2000:M1 to 2011:M12. Despite the similar structure of TVPs, the present paper extends the latter study by controlling for stochastic volatility. Ignoring conditional heteroskedasticity might lead to spurious movements in time-varying variables and inaccurate inference (Hamilton, 2010). Thus, the stochastic volatility specification is included to take this issue into account. The authors follow the theoretical scheme put forward by Surico (2007) and Aragón and Portugal (2010), in which the economy is modeled from a New Keynesian perspective and the central bank loss function is assumed to be asymmetric regarding the responses to inflation and output deviations from their targets. On the empirical side, the authors propose a TVP univariate regression with stochastic volatility for the Brazilian reduced-form reaction function, following closely the Bayesian econometric procedure developed by Nakajima (2011). Given the nonlinear non-Gaussian nature of the TVP regression with stochastic volatility, the choice of a nonlinear Bayesian approach using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is justified due to the intractability of the associated likelihood function (Primiceri, 2005). Finally, based on the theoretical model specification, the authors intend to recover the central bank preference parameters as to further evaluate the degree of asymmetry and its potential time-variation under the inflation targeting regime.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Бранка Топић-Павковић

Резиме: Осигурати раст националне економије, уз истовремену унутрашњу и спољну стабилност цијена, поставља се као примарни задатак економске политике. Избор валутног одбора као модела управљања монетарном политиком обезбјеђује раст повјерења у домаћу валуту, макроекономску стабилност и јачање кредибилитета централне банке, посебно у земљама транзиционих и реформских процеса. Полазећи од ограничења овог модела монетарне политике, питања домаће конкурентности и контроле биланса текућег рачуна постају све битнија. У условима немогућности интервенције монетарне политике штетне посљедице на извоз и економски раст земље несумњиво показују да класични монетарни одбор представља погодно средство монетарне стабилизације, али не и механизам динамизирања привредног раста. Рад се фокусира на избор облика монетарне политике која би у датим условима могла да обезбиједи највећи допринос расту и привредном опоравку. Циљ рада је указати на могуће модификације постојећег система монетарног одбора у Босни и Херцеговини, анализом савремених валутних одбора и искустава земаља чланица које су примјењивале овај режим прије приступања Европској (монетарној) унији. Резултати истраживања потврђују низ предности које монетарни одбор пружа малим и отвореним економијама, али истичу и недостатке који доводе у питање одрживост овог аранжмана монетарне политике и воде модификацији постојећег модела валутног одбора, што би проширило дјеловање Централне банке Босне и Херцеговине.Summary: To ensure the growth of the national economy with simultaneous internal and external price stability is set as the primary goal of economic policy. Choosing the currency board as a model of monetary policy provides increased confidence in the local currency, macroeconomic stability and strength of the central bank credibility, especially in development countries. Considering the constraints of the currency board, national competitiveness and control of the current account balance are becoming very significant questions. In terms of the inability of monetary policy interventions to effect on exports and economic growth of the country, undoubtedly show that classical monetary board is a convenient measure of monetary stabilization but not the mechanism of intensification of economic growth. This paper focuses on the choice of monetary policy model to the given conditions which could provide the growth and economic recovery. The aim of this paper is to emphasize the possible modification of the existing system of currency board in Bosnia and Herzegovina, by analyzing modern currency boards and experiences of member states that have followed this regime before accession to the European (Monetary) Union. The results confirmed a number of benefits that monetary board provides for a small and open economy, but also point out the shortcomings that stress questions about the sustainability of this arrangement and possible tendencies of modification of existing model of the currency board, primarily with widening the instruments and action of the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (PNEA) ◽  
pp. 541-557
Author(s):  
Alejandro Rodríguez Arana

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effects on welfare of a monetary policy that establishes the reference interest rate at discrete intervals of time. The hypothesis is that because there is uncertainty about various disturbances that will occur in the period in which the referential interest rate is established, this can cause a loss of social welfare. To analyze the problem, a model is proposed where the central bank minimizes a loss function. When there is perfect certainty, an efficient frontier between the variances of inflation and output is reached. With uncertainty the result is inefficient. This implies the need to discuss whether it would be convenient for the interest rate to be set contingently. The main limitation of the work is perhaps that the model used makes a large number of abstractions, which allows it to be functional, but can leave out important aspects of reality. There seems to be very few papers, in any, that deal with the problem addressed in this work


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document